Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2022.50.11.755

A Comparison of Aerodynamic Prediction Methodologies for Missile Configurations  

Noh, Kyung-Ho (LIG Nex1)
Kang, Donggi (LIG Nex1)
Kim, Jaehyun (LIG Nex1)
Kim, Young Jin (LIG Nex1)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences / v.50, no.11, 2022 , pp. 755-762 More about this Journal
Abstract
The wind tunnel test data for the missile configuration were compared with analysis results using various semi-empirical code and CFD analysis code. The three types of configurations were used for comparison including 2 types of main wing, inline and interdigitate configuration that the main wing and tail intersect. Additionally, it was confirmed that the vortex flow was accurately predicted by comparing the CFD analysis result with the flow visualization test result.
Keywords
Semi-Empirical Method; Missile DATCOM; MISL3; Aeroprediction(AP); CFD; Wind Tunnel Test;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hemsch, M. J., "The Component Build-Up Method for Engineering Analysis of Missiles at Low-to-High Angles of Attack," Tactical Missile Aerodynamics: Prediction Methodology, AIAA, 1992.
2 Rosema, C. C., Doyle, J. B. and Blake, W. B., Missile Data Compendium (DATCOM) User Manual - 2014 Revision, December 2014.
3 Moore, F. G. and Moore, L. Y., "Approximate Method to Calculate Nonlinear Rolling Moment due to Differential Fin Deflection," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 49 No. 2, 2012, pp. 250~260.   DOI
4 Pitts, W. C., Nielsen, J. N. and Kaattari, G. E., "Lift and Center of Pressure of Wing-Body-Tail Combinations at Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic Speeds," NACA TR-1307, 1957.
5 Blake, W. B., MISSILE DATCOM User's Manual-2011 Revision, Air Force Research Laboratory, March 2011.
6 Siemens Industries Digital Software, Simcenter STAR-CCM+ User Guide - Version 2021.6, Siemens, June 2021.
7 Moore, F. G. and Moore, L. Y., "2009 Version of the Aeroprediction Code: AP09," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008, pp. 677~690.   DOI
8 Roe, P. L., "Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference schemes," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1981, pp. 357~372.   DOI
9 Menter, F. R., "Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications," AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1598~1605.   DOI
10 Moore, F., Approximate Methods for Weapon Aerodynamics, AIAA, 2000, pp. 143~149.
11 Lesieutre, D. J., "MISL3 Aerodynamic Analysis For Finned Vehicles With Axisymmetric Bodies," NEAR TR 654, Nielsen Engineering & Research, June 2010.
12 Kang, E. J., Go, B. Y. and Lee, K. S., "Analysis for Rolling Moment Characteristics of Canard-Tail Missile using CFD," Proceeding of The Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering Spring Conference, May 2018, pp. 90~91.
13 Yoon, S. J., "Some Trends in Aerodynamic Analysis Methods," Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1994, pp. 107~116.
14 Moore, F. G. and Moore, L. Y., "New Method to Predict Nonlinear Roll Damping Moments," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45 No. 5, 2008, pp. 955~964.   DOI
15 Venkatakrishnan, V., "On the Accuracy of Limiters and Convergence to Steady State Solutions," AIAA 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 1993.
16 Blair Jr., A. B., Love, J. and Lesieutre, D., "Recent Applications and Improvements to the Engineering-Level Aerodynamic Prediction Software MISL3," AIAA Paper 2002-0275, AIAA 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 2002.