Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2011.22.2.101

A Comparative Study on the Traditional Housings in Korea, China and Japan in Respect of Spatial Structure and Space Use  

Kim, Min-Seok (삼우종합건축사사무소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean housing association / v.22, no.2, 2011 , pp. 101-109 More about this Journal
Abstract
Until now, several comparative approaches were developed within the studies of Korean, Chinese, and Japanese traditional housings. In those studies, however, each space in the traditional houses was only treated in individual and fragmentary manners, and they lacked the interpretation of the topological attribute of each space within a holistic structure organized by unit spaces, and of the cultural-behavioral meaning of them within a holistic space-use pattern of the housing. The topological attribute and behavioral meaning can be analyzed and interpreted with the quantitative spatial analysis method such as Space Syntax. This study aims to analyze the traditional housings in Korea, China and Japan in the holistic aspect of spatial structure using Space Syntax, and to compare the analysis results with relating the structural attributes to the space-use pattern. In this study, the 'Banga' in Chosun era, the 'Siheyuan' in Ming-Ching era, and the 'Shoinzukuri' in Edo era were selected as the analysis subjects. The integration indices were calculated from the convex maps representing the subjects, and the common and different attributes of the three subjects were defined through comparative analyses.
Keywords
Traditional Housing; Spatial Structure; Space Use; Space Syntax; 3 Countries In East-Asia;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김미나.조성기 (2002). 韓.中.日의 경계의식에 따른 주거공간의 경계구조. 대한건축학회 논문집(계획계), 18(1), 123-132.
2 김봉렬 (1999). 한국건축 이야기 3. 파주: 돌베개.
3 김화봉 (1999). 朝鮮時代 安東文化圈의 '뜰집'에 관한 硏究. 박사학위논문, 부산대학교, 부산.
4 주남철 (1980). 한국주택건축. 서울: 일지사.
5 최일 (1989). 朝鮮 中期以後 南部地方 中上流住居에 관한 硏究. 박사학위논문. 서울대학교.
6 한국건축역사학회 편 (2003). 한국 건축사 연구 1. 서울: 발언.
7 Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
8 Hanson, J. (1998). Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge University Press.
9 Orhun, D., Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1995). Spatial types in traditional Turkish houses. Environment and Planning B, 22(4), 475-498.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 장동국 (2002). 영.호남 전통상류주택 공간의 비교분석에 관한 연구. 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 18(11), 125-132.
11 최윤경 (2003). 사회와 건축공간. 서울: 스페이스타임.
12 손세관 (2001). 넓게 본 중국의 주택(上). 서울: 열화당.
13 윤장섭 (2002). 한국건축사. 서울: 동명사.
14 이상은 (2002). 주생활과 공간구조와의 관계에 따른 조선시대 상류주택 분석. 석사학위논문, 서울대학교, 서울.
15 이원식 (2002). 생활행위별 韓.中.日 전통주거의 공간이용 특성에 따른 비교문화연구. 석사학위논문. 연세대학교.
16 장동국 (1999). 전통주거공간의 형상학적 분석. 대한건축학회논문집(계획계), 15(10), 111-120.
17 윤일이 (2005). 儒敎 受容에 따른 傳統住宅 男性空間의 變遷에 관한 比較硏究. 한국건축역사학회지, 14(1), 123-134.
18 윤장섭 (2000). 日本의 建築. 서울대학교 출판부.
19 박형진.박세정.김문덕 (2005). 한.일 전통 주거공간의 '중간영역'에 관한 연구. 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 14(3), 84-94.