1 |
Durgin, F.H., Profitt, D.R., Olson, T.J. & Reinke, K. S. (1995). Comparing depth from binocular disparity with depth from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 6739-6799
|
2 |
Foley, J.M. (1967). Disparity increase with convergence for constant perceptual criteria. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 605-608
DOI
|
3 |
Jain, R.A., Tsina, L. & Durgin, F.H. (1997). Stereoscopic 3-D shape constancy with real objects in the real world: effects of contextual disparity contrast. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 38, S904
|
4 |
Marr, D., & Poggio, T.A. (1979). A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 204, 301-328
DOI
|
5 |
Ogle, K.N. (1950). Researches in binocular vision. Philadephia: Sanders
|
6 |
Ono, H. & Comerford, J. (1977). Stereoscopic depth constancy. In W. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley
|
7 |
Ritter, M. (1977). Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 400-407
DOI
|
8 |
Tittle, J.S., Todd, J.T., Perotti, V.J. & Norman, J. F. (1995). The systematic distortion of perceived 3D structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Todd, J.T. & Reichel, F.D. (1989). Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. Psychological Review, 96, 643-657
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Cutting, J.E. & Vishton, P.M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein and S. Rogers (Eds). Perception of Space and Motion (pp.69-117). San Diego: Academic Press
|
11 |
Koenderink, J.J. & Van Doorn, A.J. (1976) .Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biological Cybernetics, 21, 29-35
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Todd, J.T. & Norman, J.F. (November, 1995). Distortions of perceived 3-D structure in natural vision. Presented at the 36thannual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles
|
13 |
Epstein, W. (1969). Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing. Perception & Psychophysics, 6 (5), 269-272
DOI
|
14 |
Foley, J.M. & Richards, W. (1972). Effects of voluntary eye movement and convergence on the binocular appreciation of depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 423-427
DOI
|
15 |
Rogers, B.J. & Cagenello, R.B. (1989). Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature, 339, 135-137
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Foley, J.M. (1980). Binocular distance perception. Psychological Review, 87 (5), 411-434
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Rogers, B.J., Cagenello, R.B. & Rogers, S. (1987). Simultaneous contrast effects in stereoscopic surfaces: The role of tilt, slant, and surface discontinuities. Perception, 16 (2), 251, A27
|
18 |
Sedgwick, H.A. (1986). Space perception. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. Thomas (Eds. ) , Handbook of Perception and Human Performance (Ch. 21, pp1-57). New York: Wiley
|
19 |
Collett, T.S., Schwartz, U. & Sobel, E.C. (1991). The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception, 20, 733-754
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Cormack, R. (1984). Stereoscopic depth perception at far viewing distances. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 423-428
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Glennerster, A., Rogers, B.J, & Bradshaw, M.F. (1994). The effects of different cues and the observer's task in stereoscopic depth constancy. Investigative Ophtahlmology and Visual Science, 35(4), 2112
|
22 |
Johnston, E.B. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1351-1360
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Rogers, S., Li, H.-C. & Dannemiller, J.D. (1995). Scaling, not disparity curvature, explains 3-D shape perception. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual science (Supplement), 36 (4), 185
|
24 |
Wallach, H., Frey, K. J. & Bode, K. A. (1972). The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 110-116
DOI
|