Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.2.186

Nursing Students' Peer Feedback Types and Emotional Response, Quality of Feedback, and Self-efficacy for Learning from Peer Feedback in Skill Training  

Park, Young A (School of Nursing, Hallym University)
Kim, Eun Jung (School of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education / v.25, no.2, 2019 , pp. 186-196 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to identify types of peer feedback in nursing skills performance training and to investigate emotional response, perceived quality of feedback and self-efficacy for learning from peer feedback. Methods: A total of 110 second-year nursing students attending fundamentals of nursing classes at a university participated in 2017. Participants received peer feedback from one selected colleague who observed their skills performance, and completed a questionnaire. Contents of peer feedback video recordings were transcribed and classified into seven types of feedback. Data were analyzed using an independent t-test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation. Results: Participants mostly received feedback of 'correcting' and 'providing information.' Positive emotional responses from peer feedback were above medium, and negative emotional responses were low. The perceived quality of peer feedback was moderate and self-efficacy for learning was high. Quality of feedback correlated with negative emotional response (r=-.24, p=.014), and self-efficacy for learning (r=.35, p<.001). Self-efficacy for learning correlated with intimacy with peers (r=.24, p=.011) and positive emotional response (r=.21, p=.028). Conclusion: The results suggest that peer feedback in skill training could be used in terms of emotional response and self-efficacy for learning.
Keywords
Feedback; Self-efficacy; Nursing education; Nursing students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education, London: Routledge.
2 Cheon, E. Y. (2013). The effects of video-aided peer feedback on enhancing nursing students' understanding of foley catheterization. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(1), 43-51.   DOI
3 Choi, E. J. (2015). Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional response (Unpublished master's thesis). The Graduate School of Chung Ang University, Seoul.
4 Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Stuyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.   DOI
5 Ilies, R., De Pater, I. E., & Judge, T. (2007). Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 590-609.   DOI
6 Kim, S. H. (2014). A study on the feedback speech of prospective elementary school teachers. Journal of Speech Communication, 25, 415-437.
7 Kannappan, A., Yip, D. T., Lodhia, N. A., Morton, J., & Lau, J. N. (2012). The effect of positive and negative verbal feedback on surgical skills performance and motivation. Journal of Surgical Education, 69(6), 798-801.   DOI
8 Kim, E. J. (2018). Effects of examiner's verbal feedback on nursing students' accuracy of self-assessment, emotional response, self-efficacy, and perceived quality of feedback in skill performance assessment. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 25(2), 146-154.   DOI
9 Kim, M. J. (2011). Identifying types of peer feedback improving learners' ill-structured task performance & developing their instructional strategies. Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(4), 755-779.   DOI
10 Kim, Y. H. (2008). Satisfaction with evaluation method for fundamental nursing practical skill education through cell phone animation self-monitoring and feedback - Focus on foley catheterization -. Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 15(2), 134-142.
11 Lee, C. D. (2008). A study on the ways of teacher's question and feedback in the classroom. The Journal of Korean Arts Education Research, 15, 177-216.
12 Lee, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the structural relationship among learner's motivation, the quality of peer review, and performance in web-blended task-based learning. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(4), 129-147.
13 Lee, K. A., Yoo, N. H., Lee, E. K., Chon, J. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2014). The relationship of academic personality types and major satisfaction on academic achievement related variables. The Korean Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 16(1), 107-121.
14 Lee, Y. J. (2012). Improving pre-service teachers' instructional design skills through peer feedback: Writing lesson plans with ASSURE model. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 687-706.   DOI
15 Lee, S. G., & Shin, Y. H. (2016). Effects of self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos on basic nursing skills, confidence in performance and learning satisfaction. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 46(2), 283-292.   DOI
16 Lee, Y. B. (2014). A study on aspects of college student writer's acceptance of peer feedback - Focused on aspects of writer's response on peer feedback and reflection on revised draft. Research on Writing, 21, 201-234.
17 Lee, Y. B. (2016). Aspects and effects of peer feedback activities by the difference of peer group members writing levels. Korean Language Education Research, 154, 127-164.
18 Lim, K. Y., Kim, Y. J., Jin, M. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of peer feedback in problem-solving: Mediating effects of feedback acceptance. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 269-294.   DOI
19 Lee, Y. J. (2015). Analysis of types of peer feedback affecting students' perceived usefulness of feedback, feedback acceptance, and task performance in instructional blog environments. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(2), 245-264.
20 Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2016, December 14). Functions and structure of medical school: Standards of accreditation of medical education program leading to the MD degree. Retrieved from https://med.virginia.edu/ume-curriculum/wp-content/uploads/sites/216/2016/07/2017-18_Functions-and-Structure_2016-03-24.pdf
21 Park, I. H., & Shin, S. J. (2015). The effects of video-based peer assisted learning in standardized patients simulation: Pre and post operative care. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 27(1), 73-82.   DOI
22 Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?. Applied Psychology, 53(1), 113-135.   DOI
23 Park, S. Y., & Kweon, Y. R. (2012). The effect of using standardized patients in psychiatric nursing practical training for nursing college students. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21(1), 79-88.   DOI
24 Plakht, Y., Shiyovich, A., Nusbaum, L., & Raizer, H. (2013). The association of positive and negative feedback with clinical performance, self-evaluation and practice contribution of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1264-1268.   DOI
25 Seo, Y. J., & Jeon, E. J. (2012). A study of peer feedback opinion validity by types in writing. Korean Language Education Research, 44, 369-395.
26 Sung, J. H., & Jung, Y. S. (2014). Study of peer talk in peer feedback: In writing lesson plans. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(11), 419-448.
27 Thomas, J. D., & Arnold, R. M. (2011). Giving feedback. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(2), 233-239.   DOI
28 Vanyolos, E., Furka, I., Miko, I., Viszlai, A., Nemeth, N., & Peto, K. (2017). How does practice improve the skills of medical students during consecutive training courses?. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 32(6), 491-502.   DOI
29 Wilkins, E. A., Shin, E., & Ainsworth, J. (2009). The effects of peer feedback practices with elementary education teacher candidates. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 79-93.
30 Yang, K. H., & Wu, Y. H. (2013). Effects of feedback types on the student's self-efficacy. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 202-205.