Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.487

The Proposed Rubrics Simulation Education Effect on Nursing Student's Academic Achievement  

Kim, Hae-Ran (Department of Nursing, Honam University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education / v.19, no.4, 2013 , pp. 487-497 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a rubric for simulation education and to evaluate this rubric's effect on academic achievement of nursing students. Methods: The rubric was developed through nursing expert's and student's negotiation. Content validity was verified. The participants were 144 undergraduate nursing students recruited from the one university in G city. The participants were given the simulation education for 15 weeks from July, 2011 through December, 2012.[LAB1] The rubric was presented to the experimental group before the course began but was not presented to the control group. The data were analyzed by t-test, $x^2$-test with SPSS win 17.0 program. Results: The simulation education rubric was to improve academic achievement. Looking at the results it significantly improved nursing competence and knowledge. Conclusion: The rubric had a positive effect on academic achievement. A rubric with a high reliability and validity in a number of areas needs to be developed, and there is a need to develop a standardized rubric for simulation education.
Keywords
Patient simulation; Achievement; Nursing education; Nursing student;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Adams, B. L. (1999). Nursing education for critical thinking: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Education, 38(3), 111-119.
2 Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11.
3 Arter, J., & Mctighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom; using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
4 Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thompson Learning.
5 Barkley, E., Cross, P., & Major, C. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6 Cooper, J. B., & Taqueti, V. R. (2008). A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Quality & safety in Health Care, 13(1), i11-i18.
7 Crawford, C. M. (2001). Rubrics: models of evaluation within a constructivist learning environment. Paper presented at annual national council of teachers of english spring conference, ERIC document reproduction service No. ED462910.
8 Decker, S., Sportsman, S., Puetz, L., & Billings, L. (2008). The evolution of simulation and its contribution to competency. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(2), 74-80.
9 Garrett, B., MacPhee, M., & Jackson, C. (2010). High-fidelity patient simulation: considerations for effective learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(5), 309-313.
10 Goodrich, H. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, UK.
11 Goodrich, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
12 Grady, S. E., & Pharm, D. (2011). Team based learning in pharmacotherapeutics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(7), 136.   DOI
13 Han, J. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2005). The outcome based assessment in engineering education and liberal education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 18(1), 33-49.
14 Jo, H. S., & Lee, C. S. (2011). The effects on student-based rubric's achievement of performance assessment in the woodworking unit. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 17(1), 99-116.
15 Kang, H. Y., Choi, E. Y., & Kim, H. R. (2013). Nursing student's experiences in team based simulation learning. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(1), 5-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kim, M. H., Kim, M. S., Chae, S. W., & Kim, Y. S. (2007). Relationship of nursing informatics competency and self-leadership among hospital nurses. The Journal of Korean Nursing Administration Academic Society, 13(2), 176-183.   과학기술학회마을
17 Kim, H. R., Choi, E. Y., & Kang, H. Y. (2010). Simulation module development and team competency evaluation. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 18(3), 392-400.   과학기술학회마을
18 Kim, M. W. (2004). Development of objectives of nursing clinical education, based on the nursing core competency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul.
19 Kim, H. D., & Jhee, I. Y. (2009). The outcome based assessment in engineering education and liberal education. Korean Journal of General Education, 3(1), 89-103.
20 Kim, H. R. (2012). Development and effects of team based simulation learning program for undergraduate nursing students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chosun University, Gwangju.
21 Kim, M. K., & Lee. K. H. (2003). The effect of self-regulated learning strategy on academic achievements and psychological characteristics. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 15(3), 491-504.
22 Kong, J. S. (2006). Effect of learner-developed rubric on English speaking in elementary classroom. Unpublished master's thesis, Kongju University, Kongju.
23 Lane, K., Graham, S., Harris, K., & Weisenbach, J. (2006). Teaching writing strategies to young students struggling with writing and at risk for behavioral disorders: Self-regulated strategy development. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(1), 60-64.   DOI
24 Lee, J. H. (2006). Influence of performance assessment using student-generated rubrics on academic achievement and learning motivation. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongwon-gun.
25 Lundberg, G. (1997). Student-generated assessment. The Science Teacher, 64(1), 50-53.
26 Nott, L., Reeve, C., & Reeve, R. (1992). Scoring rubrics: An assessment option. Science Scope, 15(6), 44-45.
27 Michaelsen, L. (2002). Getting started with team-based learning. In L. Michaelsen, A. Knight, & L. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching (pp. 27-50). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
28 Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, When and How?. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3).
29 Nam, S. K., & Choi, W. S. (2005). Effects of analytic rubrics on learners` self-directed learning ability in information technology unit assessment. Journal of Korean Industrial Education Association, 30(1), 56-67.   과학기술학회마을
30 Park, S. H., Choi, M. N., & Lee, S. K. (2008). A study on effects of well-structured cognitive reflection journal on metacognition and learning achievement. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(1), 5-13.   과학기술학회마을