Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2010.16.1.150

Development, Application and Evaluation of the Evidence-based Nursing Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis in the Patients with Risk of Bleeding  

Kim, Su-Mi (Department of Nursing Science, Chodang University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education / v.16, no.1, 2010 , pp. 150-155 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop evidence-based nursing practice guidelines for hemodialysis in the renal failure patients with risk of bleeding and to evaluate the guidelines by applying it to the practice. Method: Referring to the SIGN, the first draft for guidelines was developed based on the advices and recommendations obtained from the procedure of critical literature analysis. Then, the draft was modified by the procedures of the expert group evaluation and pilot application to the practice. The final draft was evaluated by the expert group using AGREE instrument. Result: The first draft of guidelines was developed through 8 stages of process and was evaluated by seven experts in terms of the appropriateness, applicability, and effectiveness using a 9 point scale. The mean score of 11 items was 7.90 or above. The quality of the final draft was evaluated by 5 experts using the AGREE instrument. The mean standard score was 73.0% or above in the 19 items. Conclusion: The clinical guidelines developed by this research can be utilized as systematic and scientific guidelines for hemodialysis in the renal failure patients with risk of bleeding. In addition, the research can contribute to improving care services.
Keywords
Kidney failure; Dialysis; Evidence-based nursing; Guidelines;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sachs, G. S., Printz, D. j., Kahn, D. A., Carpenter, D., & Docherty. J. P. (2000). The expert consensus guideline series: Medication treatment of bipolar disorder 2000. Retrieved October 30, 2005, from EKS${\circledR}$-Expert Consensus Guidelines${\circledR}$ Web site : http://www. psychguides.com.
2 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network〔SIGN〕(2001). A guideline developer's handbook, Retrieved January 15, 2006, from SIGN Website: http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/ index.html.
3 The AGREE Collaboration (2001). The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Instrument, 2001, form AGREE Web site: www.agreetrust.org
4 Lohr, J. W., & Scwab, S. J. (1991). Minimizing hemorrhagic complications in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2(5), 961-975.
5 National kidney foundation (2001). K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy: update 2000. Am J kidney Dis, 37(Supl), S7-S64
6 Romao, J. E. Jr, Fadil, M. A., Sbbaga, E., & Marcondes, M. (1997). Haemodialysis without anticoagulant: Haemodialysis parameters, fibrinogen kinetic, and dialysis efficiency. Nephrol dial Transplant, 12, 106-110.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 안재형, Laurence Chan (2004). 투석생활. 서울: 일조각.
8 박명화 (2005). 웹 기반 근거중심 간호실무 가이드라인 은행 시스템 개발 및 평가. 과천: 보건복지부.
9 박명화 (2006). 근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용. 서울: 군자출판사.
10 박태남 (2006). 시설노인의 비약물적 변비관리를 위한 근거중심 간호실무 가이드 라인개발. 계명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 대구.
11 김윤구, 김현진, 임영환, 김민옥, 백현정, 도연실, 장은희, 최소연, 여호명, 김정아, 김범, 이방훈, 강우헌, 오동진, 허우성, 김대중, 오하영 (2005). 헤파린 결합 Hemophan 투석기를 사용한 혈액투석법과 식염수세척 무항응고제 혈액투석법, 최소용량 헤파린 혈액투석법의 안정성과 효율성 비교. 대한신장학회지, 24(2), 246-254.
12 장은정 (1994). 혈액투석환자의 전신적 헤파린 주입법과 비헤 파린요법에 따른 투석효과의 비교. 가톨릭대학교 대학원석사학위논문, 서울.
13 정윤경, 이명은, 오필주, 이경이, 박미영, 김지영, 곽성숙, 김정연, 김미연, 정해미, 박명숙, 김주원, 김현정(2000). 무헤파린 혈액투석시 지속적 생리식염수 주입법과 간헐적 생리식염수 주입법의 비교연구, 임상간호연구, 6(1), 41-48.
14 황주연 (2004). 급성혼돈 환자관리를 위한 근거중심 간호실무 가이드라인 개발. 계명대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문, 대구.
15 김현철, 한승엽, 김형규, 조원용, 서수아, 박수길, 장재원 (2004). 출혈 위험이 있는 혈액투석 환자에서 국소 항응고제 Futhan의 효과-다기관 공동연구. 대한신장학회지, 23(6), 920-926.
16 대한신장학회 (2006). 우리나라 신대체요법의 현황, from 대한 신장학회 Web site :www.ksn.or.kr.
17 박명화 (2004). 근거중심 간호실무 가이드라인 전자문서화 모델 개발. 대한의료정보학회지, 10(2), 147-159.