Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2021.51.1.67

A Study on Position Matching Technique for 3D Building Model using Existing Spatial Data - Focusing on ICP Algorithm Implementation -  

Lee, Jaehee (LX Spatial Information Research Institute)
Lee, Insu (LX Spatial Information Research Institute)
Kang, Jihun (LX Spatial Information Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX / v.51, no.1, 2021 , pp. 67-77 More about this Journal
Abstract
Spatial data is becoming very important as a medium that connects various data produced in smart cities, digital twins, autonomous driving, smart construction, and other applications. In addition, the rapid construction and update of spatial information is becoming a hot topic to satisfy the diverse needs of consumers in this field. This study developed a software prototype that can match the position of an image-based 3D building model produced without Ground Control Points using existing spatial data. As a result of applying this software to the test area, the 3D building model produced based on the image and the existing spatial data show a high positional matching rate, so that it can be widely used in applications requiring the latest 3D spatial data.
Keywords
Drone; 3D building model; position matching; spatial data;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Han SH, Jung KY. 2015. Accuracy Evaluation of UAV based on GCP Usage. Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, and Cartography. 255-256.
2 Khoramshahi E, Oliveira RA, Koivumaki N, Honkavaara E. 2020. An Image-Based Real-Time Georeferencing Scheme for a UAV Based on a New Angular Parametrization. Remote Sensing. 12(19):3185-3211.   DOI
3 Koeva M, Muneza M, Gevaert C, Gerke M, Nex F. 2016. Using UAVs for map creation and updating. A case study in Rwanda. Survey Review. 50:312-325.   DOI
4 Kim MS, Park DY. 2020. A Study on Feasible 3D Object Model Generation Plan Based on Utilization, Demand, and Generation Cost. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1):215-229.   DOI
5 Kim JG, Lee JH, Park SM, Ko KH. 2018. A Modified Method for Registration of 3D Point Clouds with a Low Overlap Ratio. Journal of the Korea Computer Graphics Society. 24(5):11-19.   DOI
6 Kim TH, Lee YC. 2020. Comparison of Open Source based Algorithms and Filtering Methods for UAS Image Processing. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(2):155-168.   DOI
7 Kim HG, Hwang YH, Rhee SA. 2019. Automatic Building Modeling Method Using Planar Analysis of Point Clouds from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing. 35(6-1):973-985.
8 Yun BY, Lee JO, Lee DS. 2016. A Study on the Enactment of UAV Standard Estimating for Applying in Spatial Information Area. Journal of The Korean Cadastre Information Association. 18(1):123-132.
9 Lee JO, Sung SM. 2018. Assessment of Positioning Accuracy of UAV Photogrammetry based on RTK-GPS. Journal of The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 19(4):63-68.   DOI
10 Kim HG, Hwang YH, Rhee SA. 2020. Automatic Generation of Clustered Solid Building Models Based on Point Cloud. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing. 36(6-1):1349-1365.
11 Zhang H, Aldana-Jague E, Clapuyt F, Wilken F, Vanacker V, Oost KV. 2019. Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic(PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure-from-motion(SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection. Earth Surface Dynamics. 7(3):807-827.   DOI
12 Seo HD, Kim EM. 2020. Object Classification and Change Detection in Point Clouds Using Deep Learning. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(2):37-51.   DOI
13 Lim SH, Choi KM, Cho GS. 2020. A Study on 3D Model Building of Drones-Based Urban Digital Twin. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1):163-180.   DOI
14 Han SH. 2019. Project Design Plan for Drone Photogrammetry. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 39(1):239-246.   DOI
15 Deng F. 2011. Registration between Multiple Laser Scanner Data Sets. Laser Scanning, Theory and Applications:IntechOpen, p. 449-472.
16 Gustafsson H, Zuna L. 2017. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Geographic Data Capture: A Review[Bachelor thesis]. Royal Institute of Technology. p.47-54.
17 Penney GP, Edwards PJ, King AP, Blackall JM, Batchelor PG, Hawkes DJ. 2001. A Stochastic Iterative Closest Point Algorithm (stochast-ICP). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; p. 762-769.
18 Pix4Dmapper. 2017. Do RTK/PPK drones give you better results than GCPs? [Internet]. [https://www.pix4d.com/blog/rtk-ppk-drones-gcp-comparison]. Last accessed 03 May 2021.
19 Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy, M. 2001. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In Proceedings of Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling. p. 145-152.
20 Rusu RB, Blodow N, Beetz M. 2009. Fast Point Feature Histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration. In Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. p. 3212-3217.