Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2018.48.1.15

A Study on Identifying Topics and Trends in International Cadastral Research Using LDA: With Special Reference to the FIG Peer Review Journal  

kim, Yun-Ki (Department of Land Management, Choengju University)
Publication Information
Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX / v.48, no.1, 2018 , pp. 15-33 More about this Journal
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to identify the topics and research trends of international cadastral research using LDA. To achieve this goal, I reviewed the literature on LDA and international cadastral study and formulated four research questions that are topics of cadastral researchers, distribution of topics, the most influential topics and changes of topics over time. To answer these research questions, I analyzed 370 papers published in the FIG Peer Review Journal between January 1, 2008, and October 31, 2017, using LDA. As a result of the analysis, I confirmed that there are twelve major topics in international cadastral research. And the most influential topic of these topics was identified as topic 2(cadastral information systems), and topic 5(land development and land administration) was also confirmed as playing an important role in the overall document. These two topics have been the most popular topics whose trendlines have been very active over the past decade and will play a leading role in future cadastral research.
Keywords
Topics; Trends; LDA; International Cadastral Research; Cadastral Information Systems; Land Development; Land Administration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhu, S. (2014). Pain expression recognition based on pLSA model. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
2 Gregoire, D. A., Noel, M. X., Dery, R., & Bechard, J. P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(3), 333-373.   DOI
3 Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228-5235.   DOI
4 Hansen K.D., Gentry J., Long L., Gentleman R., Falcon S., Hahne F., & Sarkar D. (2017). Rgraphviz: Provides plotting capabilities for R graph objects. R package version 2.20.0.
5 Gucevic, J., & Miljkovic, S. (2014). Testing the Operational Quality of the Permanent GNSS stations network within AGROS RTK Service. Geonauka, 2(1), 14-19.   DOI
6 He, Y., & Hui, S. C. (2002). Mining a web citation database for author co-citation analysis. Information processing &management, 38(4), 491-508.   DOI
7 Hoffman, M., Bach, F. R., & Blei, D. M. (2010). Online learning for latent dirichlet allocation. In advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 856-864).
8 Hsiao, C. H., & Yang, C. (2011). The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 128-136.   DOI
9 Karpik, A. P., & Musikhin, I. A. (2016). RESEARCH AND PRACTICAL TRENDS IN GEOSPATIAL SCIENCES. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 41.
10 Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.   DOI
11 Chang, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Boyd-Graber, J. L., & Blei, D. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 288-296).
12 Chaney, A. J. B., & Blei, D. M. (2012, March). Visualizing Topic Models. In ICWSM.
13 Chen, C., & Carr, L. (1999, February). Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: author co-citation analysis (1989-1998). In Proceedings of the tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots: returning to our diverse roots (pp. 51-60). ACM.
14 Choi, H. S., Lee, W. S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2017). Analyzing research trends in personal information privacy using topic modeling. Computers & Security, 67, 244-253.   DOI
15 Das, S., Sun, X., & Dutta, A. (2016). Text Mining and Topic Modeling of Compendiums of Papers from Transportation Research Board Annual Meetings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2552), 48-56.
16 Deininger, K., Selod, H., &Burns, A. (2012). The Land Governance Assessment Framework: Identifying and monitoring good practice in the land sector. World Bank Publications.
17 Franco, J. C. (2010). Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(1), 1-32.   DOI
18 Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of information science, 25(1), 67-78.   DOI
19 Enemark, S. (2009). Sustainable Land Administration Infrastructures to support Natural Disaster Prevention and Management. In The United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for the Americas.
20 Estabrooks, C. A., Derksen, L., Winther, C., Lavis, J. N., Scott, S. D., Wallin, L., & Profetto-McGrath, J. (2008). The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implementation Science, 3(1), 49.   DOI
21 Gatti, C. J., Brooks, J. D., & Nurre, S. G. (2015). A historical analysis of the field of or/ms using topic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.05154.
22 Bisnath, S., Saeidi, A., Wang, J. G., & Seepersad, G. (2013). Evaluation of Network RTK Performance and Elements of Certification-A Southern Ontario Case Study. Geomatica, 67(4), 243-251.   DOI
23 Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84.   DOI
24 Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006, June). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning (pp. 113-120). ACM.
25 Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2009). Topic models. Text mining: classification, clustering, and applications, 10(71), 34.
26 Liu, Y., Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Gryc, W. (2009, June). Topic-link LDA: joint models of topic and author community. In proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning (pp. 665-672). ACM.
27 Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan), 993-1022.
28 Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for inBlei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003).   DOI
29 Kim, Y. K. & Lee, S. B. (2006). A Study on Improving Cadastre System and Cadastre-related Laws for Introducing 3D Cadastre. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 2006.9, 147-162.
30 Lafferty, J. D., & Blei, D. M. (2006). Correlated topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 147-154).
31 Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Castro-Garcia, M., Perez-Romero, A. M., Garcia-Cruz, A., Novas, N., & Salmeron-Manzano, E. (2016). Alternative methods for teaching cadastre and remote sensing. Survey Review, 48(351), 450-459.   DOI
32 Mcauliffe, J. D., & Blei, D. M. (2008). Supervised topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 121-128).
33 Neis, P., & Zielstra, D. (2014). Recent developments and future trends in volunteered geographic information research: The case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet, 6(1), 76-106.   DOI
34 Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.   DOI
35 Rizos, C. (2007). Alternatives to current GPS-RTK services and some implications for CORS infrastructure and operations. GPS solutions, 11(3), 151-158.   DOI
36 Paulsson, J., & Paasch, J. (2011). 3D property research-a survey of the occurrence of legal topics in publications. In 2nd International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Delft, The Netherlands, 16-18 November, 2011 (pp. 1-14). International Federation of Surveyors.
37 Paulsson, J., & Paasch, J. M. (2013). 3D property research from a legal perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 40, 7-13.   DOI
38 Paulsson, J., & Paasch, J. M. (2015). The land administration domain model-a literature survey. Land use policy, 49, 546-551.   DOI
39 Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: a co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pra.   DOI
40 Ramage, D., Hall, D., Nallapati, R., & Manning, C. D. (2009, August). Labeled LDA: A supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 1-Volume 1 (pp. 248-256). Association for Computational Linguistics.
41 Schwarz, C. (2017). ldagibbs: A command for Topic Modeling in Stata using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Forthcoming Stata Journal.ctice, 30(3), 399-415.
42 Silva, L. (2007). Institutionalization does not occur by decree: Institutional obstacles in implementing a land administration system in a developing country. Information Technology for Development, 13(1), 27-48.   DOI
43 van Oosterom, P. (2013). Research and development in 3D cadastres. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 40, 1-6.   DOI
44 Silva, M. A., & Stubkjaer, E. (2002). A review of methodologies used in research on cadastral development. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(5), 403-423.   DOI
45 Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A., &Williamson, I. P. (2004). Evaluation of land administration systems. Land Use Policy, 21(4), 371-380.   DOI
46 Sun, L., & Yin, Y. (2017). Discovering themes and trends in transportation research using topic modeling. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 77, 49-66.   DOI
47 Wang, C., & Blei, D. M. (2011, August). Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 448-456). ACM.
48 Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., &Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development (p. 487). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press Academic.
49 Watkins, D., & Reader, D. (2002). Identifying current trends in entrepreneurship research: A new approach. ARPENT: Annual Review of Progress in Entrepreneurship, 2, 311.
50 White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327-355.   DOI
51 Williamson, I., & Ting, L. (2001). Land administration and cadastral trends-a framework for re-engineering. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25(4), 339-366.   DOI