Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2017.47.1.277

A Comparative Study on the DIF Zone Boundary Configuration by the Hot Spot Analysis Method  

Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Urban Planning, Graduate School of Hongik University)
Choei, Nae-Young (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Hongik University)
Publication Information
Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX / v.47, no.1, 2017 , pp. 277-292 More about this Journal
Abstract
The development impact fee (DIF) zoning is a very beneficial public tool to provide the pre-planned urban infrastructures in those areas where significant urban sprawl had already taken place. In order to guarantee its benefit, however, it is required to designate the zone boundaries accurately and consistently. This study, in this context, tries to test the validity of the 50m-grid suggested in the official DIF manual, and to compare an alternative Hot Spot Analysis tool with the existing Spatial Aggregation method in configuring the zone boundaries. The results indicate that, unlike the case of population growth rate, current 50m grid size could not be much adequate in the case of using the development-permit increase rate to configure the primary DIF zones. Also, the optimal grid sizes seem to differ in the cases of Spatial Aggregation and Hot Spot Analysis. Further extended studies, in this regard, seem necessary to check the validity of the existing grid-size criteria as well as the boundary configuration methods.
Keywords
Impact Fee Zoning; Development Permit; Spatial Aggregation; Hot Spot Analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 건설교통부. 2004. 기반시설연동제 활성화방안에 관한 연구. 건설교통부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Construction and Transportation. 2004. A Study to Promote the Administration of the Development Impact Fee Zoning Regulation. MOCT. Research report. Korea.)
2 건설교통부. 2006. 기반시설부담금에 관한 법률 산정기준 마련을 위한 연구. 건설교통부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Construction and Transportation. 2006. A Study to Prepare a Legal Provision for the Development Impact Fee Estimation Standards. MOCT. Research report. Korea.)
3 국토교통부. 2013. 기반시설부담구역제 제도개선 및 활성화 방안 연구. 국토교통부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. 2013. A Study to Amend the DIF Zoning Law to Vitalize Its Administration. MOLIT. Research report. Korea.)
4 국토연구원. 2010. 도시성장관리를 고려한 기반시설부담구역제도 개선방안 연구. 국토연구원 연구보고서. (Korean Research Institute for Human Settlement. 2010. A Study to Improve the DIF Zoning Regulation for Urban Growth Control. KRIHS. Research report. Korea.)
5 국토해양부. 2008a. 기반시설부담구역제도 시행 및 운영활성화를 위한 연구. 국토해양부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs. 2008a. A Study to Promote the Administration and Manipulation of the Development Impact Fee Zoning Provision. MLTM. Research Report. Korea.)
6 국토해양부. 2008b. 기반시설부담구역제도 운영편람. 국토해양부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs. 2008b. The Administrative Manual for DIF Zoning. MLTM. Research Report. Korea.)
7 국토해양부. 2009. 기반시설 확충을 위한 기반시설부담구역제도 개선방안 보고. 국토해양부 연구보고서. (Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs. 2009. The Guidebook for DIF Zoning. MLTM. Government Guidebook. Korea.)
8 이용직, 최내영. 2014. 기반시설부담구역 추출을 위한 용도지역지구 공간정보 적용방안 연구. 한국지형공간정보학회지. 22(1): 89-99. (Lee YJ, Choei NY. 2014. A Method to Use the Land-Use Zoning Information to Extract the DIF Zones. Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 22(1): 89-99.)   DOI
9 최내영. 2009a. 기반시설부담구역 지정을 위한 격자분석방법 연구: 산업형 개발유형을 중심으로. 한국도시지리학회지. 12(2): 65-75. (Choei NY. 2009a. A Grid Analysis to Designate the Zone to Levy the Impact Fee for Infrastructure Provision: the Case of the Industrial Localities. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographic Society. 12(2): 65-75.)
10 최내영. 2009b. 기반시설설치구역 지정을 위한 공간정보 적용방안 연구. 한국공간정보시스템학회논문지. 11(3): 40-45. (Choei NY. 2009b. Spatial Designation of Impact Fee Zone Using the Parcel Development Permit Information. Journal of the Korea Spatial Information Society. 11(3): 40-45.)
11 Aldstadt J, Getis A. 2006. Using AMOEBA to Create a Spatial Weights Matrix and Identify Spatial Clusters. Geographical Analysis. 38(4): 327-343.   DOI
12 최내영. 2009c. 인구증가 분석격자의 공간정보를 이용한 기반시설 부담구역 설정방안. 한국지리정보학회지. 12(4): 74-83. (Choei NY. 2009c. Determination of the Impact Fee Zone Based on the Grid Analysis of Population Increase. Journal of the Korean Society for GeoSpatial Information Science. 12(4): 74-83.)
13 최내영. 2010. 인구증가지역에 대한 기반시설부담구역지정 대안비교 연구. 한국도시지리학회지. 13(3): 1-11. (Choei NY. 2010. A Comparative Study of Alternatives to Designate the Impact Fee Zones Based on the Population Increase Rate. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society. 13(3): 1-11.)
14 최준영, 최내영. 2016. 기반시설부담구역제도의 구역경계 지정을 위한 비용거리 분석방법 적용방안. 한국지형공간정보학회지. 24(2): 3-13. (Choi JY, Choei NY. Application of the Cost-Distance Measures for Designating Zone Boundaries in DIF Zoning. Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information System. 24(2): 3-13.)
15 Bracken I, Martin D. 1995. Linkage of the 1981 and 1991 Censuses Using Surface Modelling Concepts, Environment and Planning A, 27: 379-390.   DOI
16 Clarke W, Evans J. 1999. Development Impact Fees and the Acquisition of Infrastructure. Journal of Urban Affairs. 21(3): 281-288.   DOI
17 Martin D. 1996. An Assessment of Surface and Zonal Models of Population. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 10(8): 973-989.   DOI
18 Openshaw S, Taylor PJ. 1981. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In 'Quantitative Geography: a British View.' (Eds Wrigley N, Bennett R.). p. 60-69.