Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2011.13.3.065

A Study on Performance Warranty Criteria for Expressway Jointed Concrete Pavements  

Yeo, Hyun-Dong (인하대학교토목공학과, 현대건설주식회사)
Ahn, Deok-Soon (한국건설기술연구원 도로연구실)
Suh, Young-Chan (한양대학교 교통공학과)
Jeong, Jin-Hoon (인하대학교 토목공학과부)
Publication Information
International Journal of Highway Engineering / v.13, no.3, 2011 , pp. 65-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, researches to introduce the performance warranty contract are in progress for quality improvement of road pavements. The performance warranty contract is a type of contract in which contractors guarantee to maintain certain level of performance during a period from completion of construction. The contract use in Europe and the U.S is being increased because it has been known to contribute to improvement of structure quality, reduction of life cycle cost, development of construction techniques, and etc. The research on performance indicators, threshold values, and warranty durations is essential to effectively introduce the contract in Korea. In this study, literatures on the performance warranty contract for concrete pavements of the Minnesota, Indiana, and Florida of the U.S. were reviewed. Major distresses influencing the pavement performance were investigated and analyzed in the jointed concrete pavement sections of 21 Korean expressway routes to be compared to the performance indicators, threshold values, and warranty durations of the states. More accurate comparison is expected by investigation in planned sections for a long time.
Keywords
expressway; jointed concrete pavement; performance warranty criteria; performance indicator; threshold value; warranty duration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 박성태, 박성욱, 장석명, 조성찬, 남효열, 박경원, 염상국, 인식연 (2007) 고속도로포장상태 조사 및 분석(HPMS 부문). 연구보고서, pp.17-30, 한국도로공사.
2 박용민, 김성옥, 이재영, 이학기 (1999) 국내 하자담보 책임제도의 문제점과 성능보증 계약제도의 도입방안에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 부산경남지회 논문집, 6권 제1호
3 이종광 (2001) 건설계약 시공자의 하자담보 책임에 관한 연구, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문
4 홍승호, 김준범, 김홍기, 권봉경 (2003) 포장 기능성 평가기준 및 미끄럼 관리기준 설정 연구, 한국건설기술연구원.
5 Anderson, S. D. and Russel, J. S. (2001) Guide Lines for Warranty Multi-parameter and Best-value Contracting, NCHRP Report 451, Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
6 Anderson, S. D., Blaschke, B., Trejo, D. and Erbatur, O. C (2005) Draft Warranty Implementation Plan, FHWA/TX-05/0-4498-P4, Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, Texas.
7 Brautigam, D. F. (2007) Proposed Specification: 3550400-Pavement Evaluation and Remedial Action, Florida DOT, Tallahassee, Florida.
8 D'Angelo, J., Huber, G. A., Symons, M. G., Whited, G. C., Sumtzer, R. K., Ramirez, T. L., Molenaar, K. R, Jones, D. R., Wood, J. W., Bower, S. C., Steele, J. J., Rice, J. F., Russell, J. S. and King, R. E. (2003) Asphalt Pavement Warranties : Technology and Practice in Europe, FHWA-PL-04-002, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Alexandria, Virginia.
9 Ferragut, T. (2003) Pavement Warranty Symposium Final Report, Michigan Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
10 Gharaibeh, N. G. and Miron, A. D. (2008) Warranty Specifications for Highway Construction, Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board no 2081, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp.77-82.
11 Hastak, M. (2003) The Evaluation of Warranty Provisions on ODOT Construction Projects, FHWA/OH-2003/019, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
12 Ozbek, M. E. (2004) Development of Performance Warranties for Performance Based Road Maintenance Contracts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
13 Minnesota DOT (2001) Design-Build Warranty Requirements, TH14/218 Design-Build Project, SP 7408-29, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Owatonna, Minnesota.