Browse > Article

Cavo-caval intervention stent insertion after deceased-donor liver transplantation using side-to-side piggyback technique: report of a case  

Kim, In-Gyu (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Byung-Seup (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Jeon, Jang-Yong (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kwon, Jae-Woo (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Joo-Seop (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Doo-Jin (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Jung, Jae-Pil (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Chon, Seong-Eun (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Han-Joon (Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Jeon, Eui-Yong (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Min-Jeong (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Lee, Kwan-Seop (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery / v.15, no.3, 2011 , pp. 184-188 More about this Journal
Abstract
Liver transplantation with preservation of the recipient vena cava (piggyback technique) has been performed as an alternative to the conventional method. Outflow disturbance or obstruction of the vena cava in the early period after liver transplantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We used side-to-side cavo-caval anastomosis (modified piggyback technique) in a deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for venous outflow reconstruction. On postoperative day 9, the patient developed abdominal discomfort, and abnormal liver function showing serum total bilirubin of 6.2 mg/dl and serum AST/ALT of 297/597 IU/L. Doppler ultrasound showed mono-phasic wave forms of the hepatic vein. Computed tomography showed focal narrowing of $9.5mm{\times}12mm$ in diameter at the cavo-caval anastomosis site. Liver biopsy was showed that there was no evidence of acute allograft rejection. Direct venogram showed stenosis of the cavo-caval anastomosis with a pressure gradient of 12 mmHg. An interventional stent was inserted in the stenotic site of the inferior vena cava, and the pressure gradient decreased to 2 mmHg. He was discharged from hospital on postoperative day 23 without any other complications. Herein we report a case of deceased-donor liver transplantation using the modified piggyback technique, who received an inferior vena cava stent due to stricture of the reconstructed orifice of the vena cava.
Keywords
Liver transplantation; Outflow obstruction; Anastomotic stenosis; Stent;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, et al. A single-center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti. Liver Transpl 2009;15:466-474.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cescon M, Grazi GL, Varotti G, et al. Venous outflow reconstructions with the piggyback technique in liver transplantation: a single-center experience of 431 cases. Transpl Int 2005;18:318-325.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Navarro F, Le Moine MC, Fabre JM, et al. Specific vascular complications of orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the retrohepatic vena cava: review of 1361 cases. Transplantation 1999;68:646-650.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK, et al. Early posttransplant hepatic venous outflow obstruction: Long-term efficacy of primary stent placement. Liver Transpl 2008;14:1505-1511.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lee SG, Park KM, Hwang S, et al. Modified right liver graft from a living donor to prevent congestion. Transplantation 2002;74:54-59.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lee S, Park K, Hwang S, et al. Anterior segment congestion of a right liver lobe graft in living-donor liver transplantation and strategy to prevent congestion. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003;10:16-25.
7 Tzakis A, Todo S, Starzl TE. Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. Ann Surg 1989;210:649-652.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Cherqui D, Lauzet JY, Rotman N, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the caval and portal flows. Technique and results in 62 cases. Transplantation 1994;58:793-796.   DOI
9 Bismuth H, Castaing D, Sherlock DJ. Liver transplantation by "face-a-face" venacavaplasty. Surgery 1992;111:151-155.
10 Belghiti J, Panis Y, Sauvanet A, Gayet B, Fékété F. A new technique of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic hepatic transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:270-272.
11 Kim JU, Wang HJ, Lee WH, et al. Clinical experience of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic liver transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2001;5:9-14.
12 Mosimann F, Gillet M. Retransplantation of the liver after side-to-side caval anastomosis. Transpl Int 1995;8:157-158.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Aucejo F, Winans C, Henderson JM, et al. Isolated right hepatic vein obstruction after piggyback liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2006;12:808-812.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim YJ, Ko GY, Yoon HK, Shin JH, Ko HK, Sung KB. Intraoperative stent placement in the portal vein during or after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2007;13:1145-1152.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Belghiti J, Ettorre GM, Durand F, et al. Feasibility and limits of caval-flow preservation during liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2001;7:983-987.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Akilli B, Bayir A, Kara F, Ak A, Cander B. Inferior vena cava diameter as a marker of early hemorrhagic shock: a comparative study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2010;16:113-118.
17 May AG, Van de berg L, Deweese JA, Rob CG. Critical arterial stenosis. Surgery 1963;54:250-259.
18 Moore WS, Malone JM. Effect of flow rate and vessel calibre on critical arterial stenosis. J Surg Res 1979;26:1-9.   DOI   ScienceOn