Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2022.22.4.249

Sex Determination Using a Discriminant Analysis of Maxillary Sinuses and Three-Dimensional Technology  

Jeong-Hyun Lee (Department of Oral Anatomy, Dental College, Dankook University)
Hee-Jeung Jee (Department of Bio Health Convergency Open Sharing System, Dental College, Dankook University)
Eun-Seo Park (Department of Oral Anatomy, Dental College, Dankook University)
Seok-Ho Kim (Department of Oral Anatomy, Dental College, Dankook University)
Sung-Suk Bae (Department of Dental Hygiene, Hanseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of dental hygiene science / v.22, no.4, 2022 , pp. 249-255 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Sexual dimorphism is important for sex determination in the field of forensics. However, sexual dimorphism is commonly assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) rather than three-dimensional (3D) modeling software; therefore, studies using a more accurate measurement approach are necessary. This study assessed the sexual dimorphism of the MS using a 3D modeling program to obtain information that could contribute to the fields of surgery and forensics. Methods: The CBCT data of 60 patients (age, 20~29 y; 30 males and 30 females) admitted to the Department of Orthodontics at the Dankook University School of Dentistry were provided in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. The left MS and right MS were modeled based on the DICOM files using the Mimics (version 22; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) 3D program and converted to stereolithography (STL) files used to measure the width, length, and height of the MS, infraorbital foramen (IOF), right MS, and left MS. The average of three repeated measurements was calculated, and a reliability test was performed to ensure data reliability (Cronbach's α=0.618). A canonical discriminant analysis was performed using a standard approach (left: Box's M=0.096; right: Box's M=0.115). Results: Males had greater values for all parameters (MS width, MS length, MS height, IOF, right MS, left MS) than females. The discriminant analysis identified six independent variables (MS width, MS height, MS length, IOF, right MS, left MS) that could identify sex. The left MS and right MS correctly identified the sex of 81.7% and 71.7% of the patients, respectively, with the left MS having higher accuracy. Conclusion: This study confirmed that, for Korean individuals, the left MS has a better ability to identify sex than the right MS. These results may contribute to sex identification in the fields of surgery and forensics.
Keywords
Anatomy; Maxillary sinus; Sexual dimorphism; Stereolithography; Three dimensional;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, et al.: Gray's anatomy. 38th ed. Chur Chill Living Stone, Edinburgh, pp.1637, 1995.
2 Yang SM, Park SI, Kye SB, Shin SY: Computed tomographic assessment of maxillary sinus wall thickness in edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil 39: 421-428, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02295.x   DOI
3 Anagnostopoulou S, Venieratos D, Spyropoulos N: Classification of human maxillar sinuses according to their geometric features. Anat Anz 173: 121-130, 1991.
4 Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH: The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132: 429-434, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.11.012   DOI
5 Lee JH, Park JT: Three-dimensional CBCT based evaluation of the maxillary sinus by facial index. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 5040, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095040   DOI
6 Kanthem RK, Guttikonda VR, Yeluri S, Kumari G: Sex determination using maxillary sinus. J Forensic Dent Sci 7: 163-167, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.154595   DOI
7 Luo H, Wang J, Zhang S, Mi C: The application of frontal sinus index and frontal sinus area in sex estimation based on lateral cephalograms among Han nationality adults in Xinjiang. J Forensic Leg Med 56: 1-4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.12.014   DOI
8 White TD, Folkens PA: The human bone manual. Elsevier Academic, Amsterdam, 2005.
9 Kim DI, Lee SS, Kim YS: Statistical analysis of bone elements excavated from the forensic context. Korean J Phys Anthropol 23: 1-8, 2010. https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2010.23.1.1   DOI
10 Zheng WX, Cheng FB, Cheng KL, et al.: Sex assessment using measurements of the first lumbar vertebra. Forensic Sci Int 219: 285.e1-5, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.022   DOI
11 Teke HY, Duran S, Canturk N, Canturk G: Determination of gender by measuring the size of the maxillary sinuses in computerized tomography scans. Surg Radiol Anat 29: 9-13, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0157-1   DOI
12 Lana JP, Carneiro PM, Machado Vde C, de Souza PE, Manzi FR, Horta MC: Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 23: 1398-1403, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02321.x   DOI
13 Khaitan T, Kabiraj A, Ginjupally U, Jain R: Cephalometric analysis for gender determination using maxillary sinus index: a novel dimension in personal identification. Int J Dent 2017: 7026796, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7026796   DOI
14 Wanzeler AMV, Alves-Junior SM, Ayres L, da Costa Prestes MC, Gomes JT, Tuji FM: Sex estimation using paranasal sinus discriminant analysis: a new approach via cone beam computerized tomography volume analysis. Int J Legal Med 133: 1977-1984, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02100-6   DOI
15 Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Marks MK: Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med 128: 861-872, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-0999-8   DOI
16 Ekizoglu O, Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Sayin I, Kayhan FT, Can IO: The use of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination: a thin-slice multidetector computed tomography assisted morphometric study. J Craniofac Surg 25: 957-960, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000734   DOI
17 Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z: Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography. J Forensic Sci 62: 395-398, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13272   DOI
18 Sidhu R, Chandra S, Devi P, Taneja N, Sah K, Kaur N: Forensic importance of maxillary sinus in gender determination: a morphometric analysis from Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Eur J Gen Dent 3: 53-56, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.126213   DOI
19 Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH: Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains: proceedings of a seminar at the field museum of natural history. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville, pp.15-21, 69-92, 1994.
20 Kim HJ, Yoon HR, Kim KD, et al.: Personal-computer-based three-dimensional reconstruction and simulation of maxillary sinus. Surg Radiol Anat 24: 393-399, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0058-x   DOI
21 Nahm FS: Understanding effect sizes. Hanyang Med Rev 35: 40-43, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.40   DOI
22 Plato CC, Wood JL, Norris AH: Bilateral asymmetry in bone measurements of the hand and lateral hand dominance. Am J Phys Anthropol 52: 27-31, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330520105    DOI