Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2016.16.4.284

Developing a Dental Unit Waterline Model Using General Laboratory Equipments  

Yoon, Hye Young (Department of Oral Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Lee, Si Young (Department of Oral Microbiology, College of Dentistry, Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of dental hygiene science / v.16, no.4, 2016 , pp. 284-292 More about this Journal
Abstract
Water supplied through dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) has been shown to contain high number of bacteria. To reduce the contamination of DUWLs, it is essential to develop effective disinfectants. It is, however, difficulty to obtain proper DUWL samples for studies. The purpose of this study was to establish a simple laboratory model for reproducing DUWL biofilms. The bacteria obtained from DUWLs were cultured in R2A liquid medium for 10 days, and then stored at $-70^{\circ}C$. This stock was inoculated into R2A liquid medium and incubated in batch mode. After 5 days of culturing, it was inoculated into the biofilm formation model developed in this study. Our biofilm formation model comprised of a beaker containing R2A liquid medium and five glass rods attached to DUWL polyurethane tubing. Biofilm was allowed to form on the stir plate and the medium was replaced every 2 days. After 4 days of biofilm formation in the laboratory model, biofilm thickness, morphological characteristics and distribution of the composing bacteria were examined by confocal laser microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The mean of biofilm accumulation was $4.68{\times}10^4$ colony forming unit/$cm^2$ and its thickness was $10{\sim}14{\mu}m$. In our laboratory model, thick bacterial lumps were observed in some parts of the tubing. To test the suitability of this biofilm model system, the effectiveness of disinfectants such as sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and chlorhexidine, was examined by their application to the biofilm formed in our model. Lower concentrations of disinfectants were less effective in reducing the count of bacteria constituting the biofilm. These results showed that our DUWL biofilm laboratory model was appropriate for comparison of disinfectant effects. Our laboratory model is expected to be useful for various other purposes in further studies.
Keywords
Biofilms; Dental infection control; Disinfectants; Model; Water microbiology;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Bennett AM, Fulford MR, Martin MV, Marsh PD: Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systems in general dental practice. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3363-3367, 2000.   DOI
2 Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Finney M, et al.: Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe. Eur J Oral Sci 112: 412-418, 2004.   DOI
3 Yoon HY, Lee SY: Bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems in a student clinical simulation laboratory of college of dentistry. J Dent Hyg Sci 2: 232-237, 2015.
4 Williams HN, Paszko-Kolva C, Shahamat M, Palmer C, Pettis C, Kelley J: Molecular techniques reveal high prevalence of legionella in dental units. J Am Dent Assoc 127: 1188-1193, 1996.   DOI
5 Singh R, Stine OC, Smith DL, Spitznagel JK Jr, Labib ME, Williams HN: Microbial diversity of biofilms in dental unit water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 3412-3420, 2003.   DOI
6 Porteous NB, Redding SW, Jorgensen JH: Isolation of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria in treated dental unit waterlines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98: 40-44, 2004.   DOI
7 Dutil S, Veillette M, Meriaux A, Lazure L, Barbeau J, Duchaine C: Aerosolization of mycobacteria and legionellae during dental treatment: low exposure despite dental unit contamination. Environ Microbiol 9: 2836-2843, 2007.   DOI
8 Al-Hiyasat AS, Ma'ayeh SY, Hindiyeh MY, Khader YS: The presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the dental unit waterline systems of teaching clinics. Int J Dent Hyg 5: 36-44, 2007.   DOI
9 Kohn WG, Harte JA, Malvitz DM, et al.: Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings-2003. J Am Dent Assoc 135: 33-47, 2004.   DOI
10 American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental unit waterlines: approaching the year 2000. J Am Dent Assoc 130: 1653-1664, 1999.
11 Fiehn NE, Larsen T: The effect of drying dental unit waterline biofilms on the bacterial load of dental unit water. Int Dent J 52: 251-254, 2002.   DOI
12 Cobb CM, Martel CR, McKnight SA 3rd, Pasley-Mowry C, Ferguson BL, Williams K: How does time-dependent dental unit waterline flushing affect planktonic bacteria levels? J Dent Educ 66: 549-555, 2002.
13 Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Fulford MR, Marsh PD: Microbiological evaluation of a range of disinfectant products to control mixed-species biofilm contamination in a laboratory model of a dental unit water system. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 3327-3332, 2003.   DOI
14 Copenhagen TL: The effect of ultrafiltration on the quality of water from dental units. Int Dent J 56: 352-355, 2006.   DOI
15 Walker JT, Marsh PD: Microbial biofilm formation in DUWS and their control using disinfectants. J Dent 35: 721-730, 2007.   DOI
16 Karpay RI, Plamondon TJ, Mills SE, Dove SB: Combining periodic and continuous sodium hypochlorite treatment to control biofilms in dental unit water systems. J Am Dent Assoc 130: 957-965, 1999.   DOI
17 Smith AJ, Bagg J, Hood J: Use of chlorine dioxide to disinfect dental unit waterlines. J Hosp Infect 49: 285-288, 2001.   DOI
18 Kettering JD, Munoz-Viveros CA, Stephens JA, Naylor WP, Zhang W: Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents. J Calif Dent Assoc 30: 735-741, 2002.
19 Schel AJ, Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ, et al.: Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European union. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1380-1387, 2006.   DOI
20 Lin SM, Svoboda KK, Giletto A, Seibert J, Puttaiah R: Effects of hydrogen peroxide on dental unit biofilms and treatment water contamination. Eur J Dent 5: 47-59, 2011.
21 O'Donnell MJ, Boyle MA, Russell RJ, Coleman DC: Management of dental unit waterline biofilms in the 21st century. Future Microbiol 6: 1209-1226, 2011.   DOI
22 Williams HN, Baer ML, Kelley JI: Contribution of biofilm bacteria to the contamination of the dental unit water supply. J Am Dent Assoc 126: 1255-1260, 1995.   DOI
23 Yabune T, Imazato S, Ebisu S: Assessment of inhibitory effects of fluoride-coated tubes on biofilm formation by using the in vitro dental unit waterline biofilm model. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 5958-5964, 2008.   DOI
24 Yabune T, Imazato S, Ebisu S: Inhibitory effect of PVDF tubes on biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines. Dent Mater 21: 780-786, 2005.   DOI
25 Meiller TF, Depaola LG, Kelley JI, Baqui AA, Turng BF, Falkler WA: Dental unit waterlines: biofilms, disinfection and recurrence. J Am Dent Assoc 130: 65-72, 1999.   DOI
26 Williams JF, Johnston AM, Johnson B, Huntington MK, Mackenzie CD: Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines: prevalence, intensity and microbiological characteristics. J Am Dent Assoc 124: 59-65, 1993.
27 Barbeau J, Tanguay R, Faucher E, et al.: Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 3954-3959, 1996.
28 Lee BM, Kim CW, Kim YS: A study on the microbial contamination of dental unit and ultrasonic scaler. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 36: 64-80, 1998.