Browse > Article

The Microleakage in Class V Cavity Based on Different Kinds of Several Dentin Adhesive and Composite Resin  

Choi, Yoo-Seok (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University)
Jeong, Soon-Jeong (Department of Oral Histology and Developmental Biology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jeong, Moon-Jin (Department of Oral Histology and Developmental Biology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Ahn, Yong-Soon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University)
Park, Seon-Nyeo (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University)
Lim, Do-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Graduate School of Public Health Science, Eulji University)
Publication Information
Journal of dental hygiene science / v.13, no.3, 2013 , pp. 330-338 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to explore microleakage in class V cavity based on different kinds of several dentin adhesive and composite resin, 2 kinds of composite resin was restored and exposed after applying 4 kinds of dentin adhesives. Deposited in methylene blue solution for 4 hours and cut in parallel with tooth longitudinal axis. By observing dye penetration level of enamel and dentin margins of each restored resin following conclusion was obtained. 1. In composite resin Filtek Z350XT Universal (3M/ESPE Dental Products, USA) in enamel margin, Easy Bond (3M/ESPE Dental Products) showed the lowest microleakage and this leakage was represented to be high in the order of Single Bond 2 (3M/ESPE Dental Products), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M/ESPE Dental Products) and Cearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc., Japan). In case of Filtek Z350XT Flowable (3M/ESPE Dental Products), Scotchbond Multi-Purpose showed the lowest microleakage and this leakage was represented to be high in the order of Single Bond 2, Clearfil SE Bond and Easy Bond. 2. In case of Filtek Z350XT Universal in dentin margin, Easy Bond showed the lowest microleakage and this leakage was represented to be high in the order of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Single Bond 2 and Clearfil SE Bond. In case of Filtek Z350XT Flowable, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose and Single Bond showed the lowest microleakage and this leakage was represented to be high in the order of Clearfil SE Bond and Easy Bond. 3. In all the groups excepting S-U group (Single Bond 2+Filtek Z350XT Universal), enamel margin showed more higher microleakage than that of dentin margin. 4. There was a difference between enamel and dentin margin among each group but it was not significant statistically (p>0.05). When summarizing this result, it is considered that composite resin and dentin adhesive could be applied selectively and particularly in case of applying 1-step self-etching dentin adhesive, this method would be advantageous for manipulation convenience and shortening of operation time.
Keywords
Class V cavity; Composite resin; Dentin adhesive; Microleakage; Thermocycling;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lim YH: The comparison of microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Busan, 2001.
2 Kim HJ: Microleakage of flowable resin composite by types of adhesive systems. Unpublished master's thesis, Chosun University, Gwangju, 2007.
3 Lee KW, Choung SJ, Han YC, et al.: Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restorations with or without mechanical retention. J Korean Acad Con Dent 31: 300-311, 2006.   DOI
4 Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS: Fundamentals of operative dentistry. In: A contemporary approach. 2nd ed. Quintessence Pub., Chicago, p.396, 2001.
5 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, et al.: Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3: 237-245, 2001.
6 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, et al.: Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 16: 329-334, 2003.
7 Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM: Dye for caries detection influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Invest 6: 244-248, 2002.   DOI
8 Smith DC, Williams DP: Biocompatibility of dental material. In: Glenn JF. Composition and properties of unfilled and composite resin restorative materials. vol. III, CRC Press, Boca Rapton, pp.97-130, 1982.
9 Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangc B: The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities. Oper Dent 28: 42-46, 2003.
10 Kang SH: Microleakage of microfill and flowable composite resins in class V cavity after load cycling. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, 2003.
11 Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL: Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dentin resin composite. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 78: 196-203, 2006.
12 Park JE: The study on the microleakage pattern of flowable composite resin restorations according to the type of adhesive materials. Unpublished master's thesis, Dankook University, Cheonan, 2007.
13 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M: Buonocore memorial lecture Adhesion to enamel and dentin current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28: 215-235, 2003.
14 Nam KY, Kim JB, Jang BC, Kwon TY, Kim KH: Effects of dentin bonding agents on bonding durability of a flowable composite to dentin. J Dent Master 26: 224-231, 2007.   DOI
15 Attar N, Korkmaz Y: Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Prac 8: 80-88, 2007.
16 Saunders WP, Saunders EM: Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. J Am Dent 9: 34-36, 1996.
17 Jeong JH: Marginal microleakage of single step adhesives. Unpublished master's thesis, Chosun University, Gwangju, 2004.
18 Koo BW, Son HH: The effect of dentin bonding agents on marginal leakage following restoration on the cervical abrasion. J Korean Acad Con Dent 12: 55-63, 1987.
19 Cooley RL, Robbins JW: Glass ionomer microleakage in class V restorations. Gen Dent 36: 113-115, 1988.
20 Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD: Microleakage of class V compomer and light cured glass ionomer restorations. J Prosthetic Dent 79: 261-263, 1998.   DOI
21 McCoy RB, Andersen MH, Lepe X: Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 129: 593-599, 1998.   DOI
22 Lee SY: An in vivo study of microleakage of composite resins. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, 2003.
23 Bae SB, Cho YG, Lee MS: Comparison of marginal microleakage between low and high flowable resins in class V cavity. J Korean Acad Con Dent 34: 477-483, 2009.   DOI
24 Ferdianakis K: Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 221-229, 1998.
25 Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N: Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions two year results. Oper Dent 32: 313-321, 2007.   DOI