Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13161/kibim.2020.10.3.054

Spatial Impacts of Brownfield Redevelopments on Neighborhood Housing Turnover and Stability - Case Study of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the US -  

Woo, Ayoung (한양대학교 도시대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of KIBIM / v.10, no.3, 2020 , pp. 54-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
There is growing consensus among planners and policymakers that brownfield remediation has positive impacts on neighborhoods in terms of housing prices, public health, and environmental quality. However, there is a limited understanding of how brownfield redevelopments spatially affect neighborhood housing turnover and stability. This paper addresses the spatial impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing turnover in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. This study examines housing turnover before and after the remediation of brownfield sites countywide and in housing submarkets stratified by household income. Based on housing sales data between 1996 and 2007, the extended Cox Hazard model with the difference-in-difference approach is employed to clarify the causal relationships between brownfield redevelopments and neighboring housing turnover. Additionally, along with the results of the previous study examining impacts of brownfield remediation on nearby housing prices, this paper estimates the change of neighborhood stability due to brownfield redevelopments based on both attributes of housing prices and turnovers.
Keywords
Brownfield Redevelopments; Housing Turnover; Spatial Impacts; GIS; Extended Cox Hazard Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Adams, D., De Sousa, C., Tiesdell, S. (2010). Brownfield development: A comparison of North American and British approaches. Urban studies, 47(1), pp. 75-104.   DOI
2 Choi, Y. (2013). Policy Instruments for Brownfield Reuse Projects: A Case of Cleveland Metro Area. Korean Urban Management Association, 26(3), pp. 219-244.
3 De Sousa, C. (2000). Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: A private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), pp. 831-853.   DOI
4 De Sousa, C. (2001). Contaminated sites: The Canadian situation in an international context. Journal of Environmental Management, 62(2), pp. 131-154.   DOI
5 De Sousa, C. A., Wu, C., Westphal, L. M. (2009). Assessing the effect of publicly assisted brownfield redevelopment on surrounding property values. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(2), pp. 95-110.   DOI
6 Galster, G., Tatian, P., Smith, R. (1999). The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), pp. 879-918.   DOI
7 Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Mayer, H., Miller, K. T., Solitare, L. (2001). Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States. Environmentalist, 21(2), pp. 129-143.   DOI
8 Kaufman, D. A., Cloutier, N. R. (2006). The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(1), pp. 19-30.   DOI
9 Kim, T.-K., Horner, M. W. (2003). Exploring spatial effects on urban housing duration. Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1415-1429.   DOI
10 Kirkwood, N. (2001). Why is there so little residential redevelopment of brownfields? Framing issues for discussion. Retrieved from Cambridge, MA:
11 Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), pp. 319-347.   DOI
12 Lee, S., Mohai, P. (2011). Racial and socioeconomic assessments of neighborhoods adjacent to small-scale brownfield sites in the Detroit region. Environmental Practice, 13(4), pp. 340-353.   DOI
13 McCarthy, L. (2009). Off the mark? Efficiency in targeting the most marketable sites rather than equity in public assistance for brownfield redevelopment. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(3), pp. 211-228.   DOI
14 Nathanail, C. P. (2011). Sustainable brownfield regeneration. In F. A. Swartjes (Ed.), Dealing with Contaminated Sites: From theory towards practical application (pp. 1079-1104). London: Springer.
15 Ross, C. E., Reynolds, J. R., Geis, K. J. (2000). The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents' psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 65, pp. 581-597.   DOI
16 Woo, A., Joh, K., Van Zandt, S. (2016b). Unpacking the impacts of the Low-Icnome Housing Tax Credit program on nearby property values. Urban Studies, 53(12), pp. 2488-2510.   DOI
17 Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighborhood and crime: The structural determinants of personal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), pp. 7-40.   DOI
18 Sampson, R. J., Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), pp. 774-802.   DOI
19 Woo, A., Joh, K., Van Zandt, S. (2016a). Impacts of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program on neighborhood housing turnover. Urban Affairs Review, 52(2), pp. 247-279.   DOI
20 Woo, A., Lee, S. (2016). Illuminating the impacts of brownfield redevelopments on neighboring housing prices: Case of Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the US. Environment and Planning A, 48(6), pp. 1107-1132.   DOI
21 Woo A., Yu C. (2017). Beyond affordable shelters: Subsidized housing and surrounding environments for pedestrian safety. Applied geography 83: 37-45.   DOI