The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-analysis |
Yoonjin, Kang
(Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Heeju, Hong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) Suk Ho, Sohn (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) Myoung-jin, Jang (Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) Ho Young, Hwang (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) |
1 | Toth GG, Toth B, Johnson NP, et al. Revascularization decisions in patients with stable angina and intermediate lesions: results of the international survey on interventional strategy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:751-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001608 DOI |
2 | Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2014;35:2831-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094 DOI |
3 | Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2105-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087 DOI |
4 | Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807611 DOI |
5 | Ciccarelli G, Barbato E, Toth GG, et al. Angiography versus hemodynamics to predict the natural history of coronary stenoses: fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation 2 substudy. Circulation 2018;137:1475-85. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782 DOI |
6 | van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:1853-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4 DOI |
7 | Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 DOI |
8 | Sterne JA, Savovic J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 DOI |
9 | Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 DOI |
10 | Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 DOI |
11 | Daly C, Anwer S, Welton NJ, Dias S, Ades AE. Meta-analysis of event outcomes: guideline methodology document 3. Bristol: NICE Guidelines Technical Support Unit; 2021. |
12 | Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x DOI |
13 | Fournier S, Toth GG, De Bruyne B, et al. Six-year follow-up of fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e006368. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006368 DOI |
14 | Moscona JC, Stencel JD, Milligan G, et al. Physiologic assessment of moderate coronary lesions: a step towards complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:300. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.06.31 DOI |
15 | Di Gioia G, Pellicano M, Toth GG, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:1511-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.02.023 DOI |
16 | Thuesen AL, Riber LP, Veien KT, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiographically-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2732-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.043 DOI |
17 | Toth GG, De Bruyne B, Kala P, et al. Graft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: the GRAFFITI trial. EuroIntervention 2019;15:e999-1005. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00463 DOI |
18 | Rioufol G, Derimay F, Roubille F, et al. Fractional flow reserve to guide treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1875-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.061 DOI |
19 | Ferguson TB Jr, Chen C, Buch AN. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary bypass surgery: should surgeons use it? Curr Opin Cardiol 2013;28:654-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0b013e32836581a3 DOI |
20 | Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 DOI |
21 | Bruno F, D'Ascenzo F, Marengo G, et al. Fractional flow reserve guided versus angiographic guided surgical revascularization: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;98:E18-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29427 DOI |
22 | Toth G, De Bruyne B, Casselman F, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2013;128:1405-11. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002740 DOI |
23 | Changal K, Patel M, Salman F, Nazir S, Gupta R. Meta-analysis comparing angiography-guided versus FFR-guided coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2020;135:184-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.002 DOI |
24 | Casselman F, Van der Merwe J, Ferrara A, Barbato E. The present day potential role of fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:926-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.021 DOI |
25 | Timbadia D, Ler A, Sazzad F, Alexiou C, Kofidis T. FFR-guided versus coronary angiogram-guided CABG: a review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. J Card Surg 2020;35:2785-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14880 DOI |
26 | Jayakumar S, Bilkhu R, Ayis S, Nowell J, Bogle R, Jahangiri M. The role of fractional flow reserve in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020;30:671-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaa006 DOI |
27 | Toth GG, Collet C, Thuesen AL, et al. Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency: systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022;99:730-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29864 DOI |
28 | Boyd JH. FFR 4 CABG: more than a vanity plate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:933-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.031 DOI |
29 | Pellicano M, De Bruyne B, Toth GG, Casselman F, Wijns W, Barbato E. Fractional flow reserve to guide and to assess coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1959-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw505 DOI |
30 | Brown AJ, Teng Z, Evans PC, Gillard JH, Samady H, Bennett MR. Role of biomechanical forces in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:210-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2015.203 DOI |
![]() |