Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/jcs.21.132

Outcomes of Single-Incision Thoracoscopic Surgery Using the Spinal Needle Anchoring Technique for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax  

Lee, Seung Hyong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Sun-Geun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Cho, Sang-Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Song, Jae Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, Dae Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.55, no.1, 2022 , pp. 44-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Although classical multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery has been widely performed, single-incision thoracoscopic surgery (SITS) is a popular surgical technique for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). However, the inconvenient alignment of instruments and the limited field of view occasionally make surgeons convert from SITS to multi-port surgery or extend the incision. This study aimed to present an easy and safe SITS technique for PSP using a spinal needle. Methods: In total, 139 patients underwent SITS between May 2011 and December 2017. We used a spinal needle to hook the bulla or bleb, and wedge resection was performed through a small incision. Patients' medical records were reviewed retrospectively, and a telephone survey was conducted to investigate the recurrence rate. Results: The mean age of the 139 patients was 23.62±9.60 years. The mean operative time was 36.69±14.64 minutes, and multi-port conversion was not performed. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.00±0.78 days, and the mean indwelling chest tube duration was 1.97±0.77 days. No complications were observed. In the mean follow-up period of 86.75±23.20 months, recurrence of pneumothorax was found in 3 patients. Conclusion: We suggest that SITS for PSP with the aid of a spinal needle to replace a grasper is a safe and easy technique that only requires a small incision.
Keywords
Pneumothorax; Thoracoscopes; Video-assisted thoracic surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yang Y, Dong J, Huang Y. Single-incision versus conventional three-port video-assisted surgery in the treatment of pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016;23:722-8.   DOI
2 Son BS, Kim DH, Lee SK, Kim CW. Small single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using an anchoring suture in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a safe and feasible procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:1224-9.   DOI
3 Ng CS, Hui JW, Wong RH. Minimizing single-port access in video-assisted wedge resection, with a hookwire. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2013;21:114-5.   DOI
4 Mogi A, Yamaki E, Kosaka T, Asao T, Kuwano H. Thoracoscopic wedge resection through a single incision using a thin puncture device. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;20:198-201.   DOI
5 Berlanga LA, Gigirey O. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port: a feasible and safe procedure. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2044-7.   DOI
6 Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:43-6.   DOI
7 Masmoudi H, Etienne H, Sylvestre R, et al. Three hundred fifty-one patients with pneumothorax undergoing uniportal (single port) video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;104:254-60.   DOI
8 Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery. Surg Endosc 2013;27:139-45.   DOI
9 Chong Y, Cho HJ, Kang SK, et al. Outcomes of the tower crane technique with a 15-mm trocar in primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:80-4.   DOI
10 Hong KP, Kim DK, Kang KH. Staple line coverage with a polyglycolic acid patch and fibrin glue without pleural abrasion after thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:85-91.   DOI
11 Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:726-8.   DOI
12 Martin-Ucar AE, Aragon J, Bolufer Nadal S, et al. The influence of prior multiport experience on the learning curve for single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy: a multicentre comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:1183-7.   DOI
13 Jung H, Oh TH, Cho JY, Lee DH. Mid-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;50:184-9.   DOI
14 Kang DK, Min HK, Jun HJ, Hwang YH, Kang MK. Early outcomes of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;47:384-8.   DOI
15 Kapicibasi HO. Uniportal VATS technique for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an analysis of 46 cases. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36:224-8.
16 Tamura M, Shimizu Y, Hashizume Y. Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;8:153.   DOI
17 Drevet G, Ugalde Figueroa P. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: safety, efficacy and learning curve during the first 250 cases in Quebec, Canada. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016;5:100-6.   DOI
18 Yang HC, Kim S, Yum S, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S. Learning curve of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 2017;31:1680-7.   DOI