Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.20.023

Outcome of Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device for Cardiogenic Shock as a Bridge to Transplantation  

Kim, Hyo-Hyun (Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System)
Shin, Jung-Hoon (Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System)
Kim, Jung-Hwan (Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System)
Youn, Young-Nam (Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.53, no.6, 2020 , pp. 368-374 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The extracorporeal ventricular assist device (e-VAD) system is designed for left ventricular support using a permanent life support console. This study aimed to determine the impact of temporary e-VAD implantation bridging on posttransplant outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 6 patients with the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile 1, awaiting heart transplantation, who were provided with temporary e-VAD from 2018 to 2019. The circuit comprised a single centrifugal pump without an oxygenator. The e-VAD inflow cannula was inserted into the apex of the left ventricle, and the outflow cannula was positioned in the ascending aorta. The median follow-up duration was 8.4±6.9 months. Results: After e-VAD implantation, lactate dehydrogenase levels significantly decreased, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores significantly improved. Bedside rehabilitation was possible in 5 patients. After a mean e-VAD support duration of 14.5±17.3 days, all patients were successfully bridged to transplantation. After transplantation, 5 patients survived for at least 6 months. Conclusion: e-VAD may reverse end-organ dysfunction and improve outcomes in INTERMACS I heart transplant patients.
Keywords
Heart-assist devices; Heart transplantation; Heart failure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yusen RD, Edwards LB, Dipchand AI, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-third adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2016; focus theme: primary diagnostic indications for transplant. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35:1170-84.   DOI
2 Chang HH, Chen PL, Chen IM, et al. Cost-utility analysis of direct ventricular assist device vs double bridges to heart transplantation in patients with refractory heart failure. Clin Transplant 2017;31.
3 Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Young JB, et al. INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009;28:535-41.   DOI
4 Park I, Cho YH, Chung SR, et al. Temporary right ventricular assist device insertion via left thoracotomy after left ventricular assist device implantation. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;52:105-8.   DOI
5 Morgan JA, John R, Lee BJ, Oz MC, Naka Y. Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:859-63.   DOI
6 Goldstein DJ, Oz MC, Rose EA. Implantable left ventricular assist devices. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1522-33.   DOI
7 Pennington DG, McBride LR, Peigh PS, Miller LW, Swartz MT. Eight years' experience with bridging to cardiac transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:472-81.   DOI
8 Gilotra NA, Stevens GR. Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2015;8(Suppl 1):75-85.
9 Kirklin JK, Cantor R, Mohacsi P, et al. First annual IMACS report: a global international society for heart and lung transplantation registry for mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35: 407-12.   DOI
10 Parker T, Brealey D, Dyson A, Singer M. Optimising organ perfusion in the high-risk surgical and critical care patient: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2019;123:170-6.   DOI
11 John R, Long JW, Massey HT, et al. Outcomes of a multicenter trial of the Levitronix CentriMag ventricular assist system for short-term circulatory support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:932-9.   DOI
12 Pagani FD, Lynch W, Swaniker F, et al. Extracorporeal life support to left ventricular assist device bridge to heart transplant: a strategy to optimize survival and resource utilization. Circulation 1999;100 (19 Suppl):II206-10.
13 Pagani FD, Aaronson KD, Swaniker F, Bartlett RH. The use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients with primary cardiac failure as a bridge to implantable left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(3 Suppl):S77-85.   DOI
14 Smedira NG, Moazami N, Golding CM, et al. Clinical experience with 202 adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac failure: survival at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122:92-102.   DOI
15 Kashiwa K, Nishimura T, Saito A, et al. Left heart bypass support with the Rotaflow Centrifugal Pump(R) as a bridge to decision and recovery in an adult. J Artif Organs 2012;15:207-10.   DOI
16 Marasco SF, Lukas G, McDonald M, McMillan J, Ihle B. Review of ECMO (extra corporeal membrane oxygenation) support in critically ill adult patients. Heart Lung Circ 2008;17 Suppl 4:S41-7.
17 Moubarak G, Weiss N, Leprince P, Luyt CE. Massive intraventricular thrombus complicating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Can J Cardiol 2008;24:e1   DOI