Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.58

Surgical Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection at a Small-Volume Medical Center: Analysis according to the Extent of Surgery  

Lee, Chul Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu)
Cho, Jun Woo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu)
Jang, Jae Seok (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu)
Yoon, Tae Hong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.53, no.2, 2020 , pp. 58-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Despite progress in treatment, Stanford type A aortic dissection is still a life-threatening disease. In this study, we analyzed surgical outcomes in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection according to the extent of surgery at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2008 and June 2018. Of these patients, 82 underwent limited replacement (hemi-arch or ascending aortic replacement), while 16 patients underwent total arch replacement (TAR). We analyzed in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, the overall 5-year survival rate, and the 5-year aortic event-free survival rate. Results: The median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 1-128 months), with a completion rate of 85.7% (n=84). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.2%: 6.1% in the limited replacement group and 18.8% in the TAR group (p=0.120). The overall 5-year survival rate was 78.8% in the limited replacement group and 81.3% in the TAR group (p=0.78). The overall 5-year aortic event-free survival rate was 85.3% in the limited replacement group and 88.9% in the TAR group (p=0.46). Conclusion: The extent of surgery was not related to the rates of in-hospital mortality, complications, aortic events, or survival. Although this study was conducted at a small-volume center, the in-hospital mortality and 5-year survival rates were satisfactory.
Keywords
Type A aortic dissection; Postoperative complications; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Moon MR, Sundt TM 3rd, Pasque MK, et al. Does the extent of proximal or distal resection influence outcome for type A dissections? Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1244-50.   DOI
2 Merlo AE, Chauhan D, Pettit C, et al. Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct admissions and transfers. J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;11:118.   DOI
3 Arsalan M, Squiers JJ, Herbert MA, et al. Comparison of outcomes of operative therapy for acute type A aortic dissections provided at high-volume versus low-volume medical centers in North Texas. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:323-7.   DOI
4 Bashir M, Harky A, Fok M, et al. Acute type A aortic dissection in the United Kingdom: surgeon volume-outcome relation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;154:398-406.   DOI
5 Kim JB, Chung CH, Moon DH, et al. Total arch repair versus hemiarch repair in the management of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:881-7.
6 Larsen M, Trimarchi S, Patel HJ, et al. Extended versus limited arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:1104-10.   DOI
7 Lio A, Nicolo F, Bovio E, et al. Total arch versus hemiarch replacement for type A acute aortic dissection: a single-center experience. Tex Heart Inst J 2016;43:488-95.   DOI
8 Chiu P, Trojan J, Tsou S, Goldstone AB, Woo YJ, Fischbein MP. Limited root repair in acute type A aortic dissection is safe but results in increased risk of reoperation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:1-7.   DOI
9 Di Eusanio M, Trimarchi S, Peterson MD, et al. Root replacement surgery versus more conservative management during type A acute aortic dissection repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:2078-84.   DOI
10 Di Marco L, Leone A, Murana G, et al. Acute type A aortic dissection: rationale and outcomes of extensive repair of the arch and distal aorta. Int J Cardiol 2018;267:145-9.   DOI
11 Cho K, Jeong J, Park J, Yun S, Woo J. Long-term changes in the distal aorta after aortic arch replacement in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:264-72.   DOI
12 Tagusari O, Ogino H, Kobayashi J, et al. Should the transverse aortic arch be replaced simultaneously with aortic root replacement for annuloaortic ectasia in Marfan syndrome? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1373-80.   DOI
13 Schoenhoff FS, Kadner A, Czerny M, et al. Should aortic arch replacement be performed during initial surgery for aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:346-51.   DOI
14 Bachet J, Larrazet F, Goudot B, et al. When should the aortic arch be replaced in Marfan patients? Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S774-9, S785-90.   DOI
15 Genoni M, Paul M, Jenni R, Graves K, Seifert B, Turina M. Chronic beta-blocker therapy improves outcome and reduces treatment costs in chronic type B aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:606-10.   DOI
16 Melby SJ, Zierer A, Damiano RJ Jr, Moon MR. Importance of blood pressure control after repair of acute type A aortic dissection: 25-year follow-up in 252 patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2013;15:63-8.   DOI
17 Trivedi D, Navid F, Balzer JR, et al. Aggressive aortic arch and carotid replacement strategy for type A aortic dissection improves neurologic outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:896-905.   DOI
18 Criado FJ. Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Tex Heart Inst J 2011;38:694-700.
19 De Bakey ME, Cooley DA, Creech O Jr. Surgical considerations of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta. Ann Surg 1955;142:586-612.   DOI
20 Rice RD, Sandhu HK, Leake SS, et al. Is total arch replacement associated with worse outcomes during repair of acute type A aortic dissection? Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:2159-66.   DOI