Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.3.171

Factors Associated with Early Adverse Events after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Subsequent to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention  

Kamal, Yasser Ali (Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Minia University Hospital)
Mubarak, Yasser Shaban (Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Minia University Hospital)
Alshorbagy, Ashraf Ali (Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Minia University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.49, no.3, 2016 , pp. 171-176 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: A previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect the outcomes of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The objective of this study was to compare the early in-hospital postoperative outcomes between patients who underwent CABG with or without previous PCI. Methods: The present study included 160 patients who underwent isolated elective on-pump CABG at the department of cardiothoracic surgery, Minia University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients who previously underwent PCI (n=38) were compared to patients who did not (n=122). Preoperative, operative, and early in-hospital postoperative data were analyzed. The end points of the study were in-hospital mortality and postoperative major adverse events. Results: Non-significant differences were found between the study groups regarding preoperative demographic data, risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, EuroSCORE, the presence of left main disease, reoperation for bleeding, postoperative acute myocardial infarction, a neurological deficit, need for renal dialysis, hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. The average time from PCI to CABG was $13.9{\pm}5.4$ years. The previous PCI group exhibited a significantly larger proportion of patients who experienced in-hospital major adverse events (15.8% vs. 2.5%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, only previous PCI was found to be a significant predictor of major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.71; p=0.01). Conclusion: Previous PCI was found to have a significant effect on the incidence of early major adverse events after CABG. Further large-scale and long-term studies are recommended.
Keywords
Coronary artery bypass; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stents;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lisboa LA, Mejia OA, Dallan LA, et al. Previous percutaneous coronary intervention as risk factor for coronary artery bypass grafting. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;99:586-95.   DOI
2 Mehta GS, LaPar DJ, Bhamidipati CM, et al. Previous percutaneous coronary intervention increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. Surgery 2012;152:5-11.   DOI
3 Stone PH, Coskun AU, Yeghiazarians Y, et al. Prediction of sites of coronary atherosclerosis progression: in vivo profiling of endothelial shear stress, lumen, and outer vessel wall characteristics to predict vascular behavior. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003;18:458-70.   DOI
4 Muhlestein JB. Endothelial dysfunction associated with drug-eluting stents what, where, when, and how? J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2139-40.   DOI
5 Ueki C, Sakaguchi G, Akimoto T, Shintani T, Ohashi Y, Sato H. Influence of previous percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;20:531-7.   DOI
6 Holmes DR Jr, Williams DO. Catheter-based treatment of coronary artery disease: past, present, and future. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:60-73.   DOI
7 Nabel EG, Braunwald E. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2012;366:54-63.   DOI
8 Singh M, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, et al. Twenty-five-year trends in in-hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-institution experience. Circulation 2007;115:2835-41.   DOI
9 Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013;381:629-38.   DOI
10 Biancari F, Mariscalco G, Rubino AS, et al. The effect of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the immediate and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung Vessel 2014; 6:244-52.
11 Shanmugam G, West M, Berg G. Additive and logistic EuroSCORE performance in high risk patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:299-303.   DOI
12 Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE. Regression methods in biostatistics: linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models. New York (NY): Springer; 2005.
13 Taggart DP. Thomas B. Ferguson lecture: coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1966-75.   DOI
14 Arjomand H, Willerson JT, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Outcome of patients with prior percutaneous revascularization undergoing repeat coronary intervention (from the PRESTO Trial). Am J Cardiol 2005;96:741-6.   DOI
15 Vicenzi MN, Meislitzer T, Heitzinger B, Halaj M, Fleisher LA, Metzler H. Coronary artery stenting and non-cardiac surgery: a prospective outcome study. Br J Anaesth 2006;96: 686-93.   DOI
16 Johnson RG, Sirois C, Watkins JF, et al. CABG after successful PTCA: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59:1391-6.   DOI
17 Yap CH, Yan BP, Akowuah E, et al. Does prior percutaneous coronary intervention adversely affect early and mid-term survival after coronary artery surgery? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:758-64.   DOI
18 Hassan A, Buth KJ, Baskett RJ, et al. The association between prior percutaneous coronary intervention and short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2005;150:1026-31.   DOI