Browse > Article

Redo CABG Using Various Arterial Grafts  

Min, Ho-Ki (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Young-Tak (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Min-A (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kim, Wook-Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, Pyo-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Sung, Ki-Ick (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Jun, Tae-Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Yang, Ji-Hyuk (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Chest Surgery / v.42, no.4, 2009 , pp. 456-463 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Although the reports on re-operative coronary revascularization (redo-CABG) have increased, there are only limited reports on redo-CABG using arterial grafts. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and feasibility of using various arterial grafts for redo-CABG. Material and Method: A consecutive series of patients who underwent 33 redo-CABGs from March 2001 to July 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed conventional CABG in 17 patients, on-pump beating CABG in 7, off-pump CABG in 7 and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in 2. The grafted that were used included 34 internal thoracic arteries (ITA), 14 radial arteries, 14 right gastroepiploic arteries and others. Arterial composite grafts were constructed in 26 patients. Of these, a previously patent in-situ left ITA was re-used as the in-flow of a composite graft in 10 patients. Result: No hospital deaths or major wound problems occurred. The post-operative complications included 2 myocardial infarctions (6%), 1 intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (3%), 5 cases of atrial fibrillation (15.1 %) and 3 neurologic complications (9.1%). The meanfollow-up duration was 31.1$\pm$22.7 months and the 3 year survival rate was 86.4%. There were 4 late deaths (2 cardiac deaths) and no recurrent angina during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Redo-CABG with using various arterial grafts is currently a safe, feasible procedure, but further investigation and long term follow-up are needed.
Keywords
Reoperation; Coronary artery bypass surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mauro, MD, Iacò AL, Contini M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:81-87   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Christenson JT, Schmuziger M, Simonet F. Reoperative coronary artery bypass procedures: risk factors for early mortality and late survival. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11:129-133   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:855-872   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Davierwala PM, Maganti M, Yau TM. Decreasing significance of left ventricular dysfunction and reoperative surgery in predicting coronary artery bypass grafting-associated mortality: a twelve-year study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126:1335-1344   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6   DOI   PUBMED
6 Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:599-605   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Subramanian VA, McCabe JC, Geller CM. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1648-1655   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ferrari ER, von Segesser LK. Arterial grafting for myocardial revascularization: how better is it? Curr Opin Cardiol 2006; 21:584-588   PUBMED
9 Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition and prevention. Circulation 1998;97:916-931   DOI   PUBMED
10 Dion R, Glineur D, Derouck D, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:407-14   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Yamamuro M, Lytle BW, Sapp SK, Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, McCarthy PM. Risk factors and outcomes after coronary reoperation in 739 elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:464-474   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, Lytle BW, et al. Predictors of reoperation after myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:811-821   PUBMED
13 Gillinov AM, Casselma FP, Lytle BW, et al. Injury to a patent left internal thoracic artery graft at coronary reoperation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:382-6   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lim SH, Kwak YT, Lee S, et al. Clinical experiences of redo-CABG. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;35: 779-84
15 Marshall WG, Saffitz J, Kouchoukos NT. Management during reoperation of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts with minimal atherosclerosis by angiography. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:163-167   DOI   PUBMED
16 Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:990-998   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Azoury FM, Gillinov AM, Lytle BW, Smedria NG, Sabik III JF. Off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting by thoracotomy: patient selection and operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1959-1963   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mehta ID, Weinberg J, Jones MF, et al. Should angiographically disease-free saphenous vein grafts be replaced at the time of redo coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:17-23   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kim JS, Kim HG, Chang WI, Kim KB. Early and midterm results after redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;37:146-153
20 Elami A, Laks H, Merian G. Technique for reoperative median sternotomy in the presence of a patent internal mammary artery graft. J Card Surg 1994;9:123-127   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sabik III JF, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Walts PA, Lytle BW. Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1719-1727   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, et al. Vein graft disease: The clinical impact of stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103:831-840   PUBMED
23 Navia D, Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, et al. Is the internal thoracic artery the conduit of choice to replace a stenotic vein graft? Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:40-43   DOI   PUBMED
24 He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, He YH, Mack MJ. Operative mortality in reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:971-978   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Ivanov J. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120: 156-163   DOI   ScienceOn