Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14374/HFS.2020.28.4.351

Citation of Traditional Chinese Medical Classics in 『Yifangkao』  

Kim, Young-Eun (School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
Kwok, Hong-Seok (School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
Lee, Boo-Kyun (Division of Pharmacology, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
Lyu, Jeong-ah (Division of Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Herbal Formula Science / v.28, no.4, 2020 , pp. 351-363 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this paper is to describe how Wu Kun(吳昆) understood Huangdineijing 『黃帝內經』 and implemented his understanding when writting Yifangkao 『醫方考』. Methods : From Yifangkao 『醫方考』, we collected all paragraphs including "經曰", "內經曰" while excluding the ones with "論曰" to filter out Sanghanlun 『傷寒論』's perspective. The contents of Huangdineijing·Suwen 『黃帝內經·素問』 and Huangdineijing·Lingshu 『黃帝內經·靈樞』, cited in Wu Kun's Yifangkao 『醫方考』 were extracted, identified from which part it comes and sorted into headings under RyuPyeon Huangjenaegyung 『類編黃帝內經』. Results : The most cited traditional chinese medical classic in Yifangkao 『醫方考』 was Huangdineijing·Suwen 『黃帝內經·素問』 Yinyangyingxiangdalun 「陰陽應象大論篇」 which was cited 41 times. Zhizhenyaodalun 「至眞要大論篇」 had a total of 39 citations followed by Shengqitongtianlun 「生氣通天論篇」 and Liuyuanzhengjidalun 「六元正紀大論篇」 which were cited 13 times and 11 times each. In addition, it was confirmed that other 28 chapters from Huangdineijing·Suwen 『黃帝內經· 素問』, 3 chapters from Huangdineijing·Lingshu 『黃帝內經·靈樞』, 3 chapters from Nanjing 『難經』 and one chapter from Zhenjiujiayijing 『鍼灸甲乙經』 were also cited. Also the analysis of the classification of the Huangdineijing·Suwen 『黃帝內 經·素問』 showed that 57 citations were classified as 'treatment', 41 citations were classified as 'Yin and Yang and Five phases', 39 citations were calssified as 'Cause and Mechanism of Disease'. Conclusion : 1. Yifangkao 『醫方考』 have explained prescriptions by implementing principles from 5 kinds of traditional chinese medical classic including Huangdineijing·Suwen 『黃帝內經·素問』, Huangdineijing·Lingshu 『黃帝內經·靈樞』 etc. 2. According to table 3, Yifangkao 『醫方考』 have cited Huangdineijing·Suwen 『』 to explain how each compounds were used and how the Korean medical principle of Yin and Yang was applied in the prescriptions. 3. It can be suggested in formula study there is utility to understand principles of traditional chinese medical classic to comprehend prescriptions.
Keywords
Formula analysis; Discourse on Prescription; Yifangkao; Huangdineijing; Traditional Chinese Medical Classics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wang A. translated by Che IS, Maeng HS. Euibangjibhae(Korean). Seoul:Daesung Munhwasa. 1998:32.
2 Wu Kun. Yifangkao(醫方考). Guo JS. Wukun Yixuequanshu. Beijing:CPTCM. 2005:6.
3 Luo Meng-xi, Wang Jian, Shi Hai-ping. Wu Kun Yifangkao dui Huangdineijingde Fahui. J Anhui Univ Chinese Med. 2015:34(4):12-13.   DOI
4 Zhang Da-ming, Wang Duan-quan. The Analysis of TCM Formular Interpretation. Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine. 1997;3(5):25-7.
5 Wu Kun. Yifangkao(醫方考). Seoul:EuiSeongDang. 1993.
6 Hong WS combine, compare and edit. Jeonggyo Hwangjenaegyeong Somun. Seoul: Institute of Oriental Medicine. 1981.
7 Hong WS combine, compare and edit. Jeonggyo Hwangjenaegyeong Yeongchu. Seoul. Institute of Oriental Medicine. 1985.
8 Wu Kun. Huangdineijing Suwen Wuzhu(黃帝內經素問吳注). Guo JS. Wukun Yixuequanshu. Beijing:CPTCM. 2005:211, 213, 217, 219, 228, 223-4, 239, 264, 266-9, 287-9, 296, 298, 300, 307-8, 214-5, 323-4, 349, 353, 360, 411. 417-9.
9 School of Korean Medical Classics, University of Korean Medicine. RyuPyeon Huangjenaegyung (類編黃帝內經). 3rd ed. Daejeon:Joomin Press. 2005.
10 Guo Wei-feng. Fanglunde Shengchan He Fazan. TCM Res. 1989;2(3):3-4.
11 YUAN Bing, ZHU Jianping. Textual research of the beginning of discourse on prescription. Chinese J Med Hist. 2003;33(3):152-4.   DOI
12 Pang Anshi. Shanghanzongbinglun. Beijing:pmph. 2007:53.
13 Cheng WJ. Shanghanminglilun. Zhao KM. Zhongjingquanshu. Seoul:Daesung Munhwasa. 1989.619-40.
14 Socho Kug, Namil Kim, Wung-Seok Cha. A Study on The TaeYiKukZieKuaZungMunKyuk (A Collection of Imperial Medical Service Examination Questions and Answers(太醫局諸科程文格). THE JOURNAL OF KOREANMEDICAL HISTORY. 2019;32(1):21-31.
15 Ha Daren. A Collection of Imperial Medical Service Examination Questions and Answers. Seoul:Yougang Publishing company. 1988:100-2.
16 Kim, Hwan-Jin. A Study on Wu Kun's Medical Thought. Dept. of Korean Medicine, Gruduate School, Dong Guk Univ. 2002.
17 Ye Xian-chun, Elabolations on Medical Formulae Investigation. SH. J. TCM. 2007; 41(11):54-8.
18 Wu Kun. Yifangkao(醫方考). Guo JS. Wukun Yixuequanshu. Beijing:CPTCM. 2005.
19 Wan Si-mei, Wang Xu-guang, Liu Xiang. Wu Kun Yifangkao Fangjixuede Gongxian. J Anhui Univ Chinese Med. 2018;37(2):9-11.
20 Luo Meng-xi, Wang Jian. Wu Kun Yifangkao Xueshu Tese. Journal of Anhui TCM College. 2011;30(6):14-6.
21 Ni Cheng. Lidai Fanglun Moshi Tanjiu. Journal of Shaanxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2010;33(6):26-7.
22 Lian JW, Guo HF. Yifangjijie Zhushi. Beijing: PMPH. 2007:2.
23 School of Korean Medical Classics, University of Korean Medicine. RyuPyeon Huangjenaegyung (類編黃帝內經). 3rd ed. Daejeon:Joomin Press. 2005 :55, 56-7, 86, 88-9, 92, 123, 142-3, 149-50, 165, 172, 183, 189, 391-2, 400-1, 409, 434, 457, 524, 526, 537, 567, 570, 591, 599-600, 611, 626, 640, 717, 718-9, 724, 728-9, 733, 736, 746, 749, 750, 757, 872.