Browse > Article

Analysis of Status of Researches on Korean National R&D : Research Fields and Their Network of Literatures in Domestic Journals  

Lee, Cheol-Ju (한국산업기술평가관리원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.21, no.1, 2018 , pp. 201-235 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the recent slowdown of R&D budget growth rate, efficient resource allocation, operation and management of national R&D is becoming more important. At this point, recognizing the necessity of systematic and scientific research on the national R&D itself, this study analyzed previous researches on national R&D of Korea. In this study, based on the previous researches and laws, national R&D was classified according to the major stages such as planning, selection, management, performance and so on. Secondly, by using the classification criteria forged, previous researches on the national R&D published in domestic journals for the last 5 years were divided into 12 categories, and the status of researches in each field was analyzed. Lastly, through network analysis, linking status and influence of each fields were identified by using co-classification information of research literatures. As a result of this research, the performance related fields were the most active ones in terms of the number of research literatures, and connections with other fields, while the fields such as selection and infrastructure were lacking in the number of research and linkage. This study can find its meaning in identifying research fields that need more studies and connections with other areas by systematic analysis of previous studies on Korean National R&D.
Keywords
Government R&D; Public R&D; Social Network Analysis; Co-classification; Centrality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강주현.이민석.홍성만 (2016), "딜레마 상황에서의 창의적 정책대응 탐색", 한국공공관리학보, 30(4): 271-295.
2 고재창.조근태.조윤호 (2013), "키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 살펴본 기술경영의 최근 연구동향", 지능정보연구, 19(2): 101-123.   DOI
3 국가주요지표 (2017), "연구개발투자비율 (GDP 대비)", http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=4005 (18 March 2017).
4 과학기술정보통신부 (2017가), "과학기술기본법".
5 과학기술정보통신부 (2017나), "국가연구개발사업의 관리 등에 관한 규정".
6 과학기술정보통신부 (2017다), "국가연구개발사업 등의 성과평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률(약칭: 연구성과평가법)".
7 기획재정부 (2016), 2016-2020년 국가재정운용계획.
8 기획재정부 (2017), 예비타당성조사 운용지침.
9 김민지.박정규.이유아.허은녕 (2011), "Co-Classification 방법을 이용한 태양전지 연구의 학제간 다양성 분석", 신재생에너지, 7(1): 36-44.   DOI
10 김지은.이성주 (2013), "특허정보를 활용한 산업융합성 평가 방법론", 대한산업공학회지, 39(3): 212-221.   DOI
11 배용국.정상기.김재정 (2012), "정부연구개발사업의 구조적 특성 분석을 통한 정책 부합성 고찰", 한국기술혁신학회 추계학술대회, 5-18.
12 산업통상자원부 (2017), "산업기술혁신사업 공통 운영요령".
13 Morillo, F., Bordons, M. and Gomez, I. (2003), "Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Research Areas", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(13): 1237-1249.   DOI
14 Leydesdorff, L. (2007), "Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(9): 1303-1319.
15 Leydesdorff, L. (2008), "Patent Classifications as Indicators of Intellectual Organization", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(10): 1582-1597.
16 McCain, K. (1995), "The Structure of Biotechnology R & D", Scientometrics, 32(2): 153-175.   DOI
17 Nelson, R. R. (1959), "The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature", The Journal of Business, 32(2): 101-127.   DOI
18 Neuhaus, C., and Daniel, H.-D. (2009), "A New Reference Standard for Citation Analysis in Chemistry and Related Fields Based on the Sections of Chemical Abstracts", Scientometrics, 78, 219-229.   DOI
19 Nieminen, J. (1974), "On Centrality in Graph", Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15(1): 332-336.   DOI
20 Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F. and Skvoretz, J. (2010), "Node Centrality in Weighted Networks: Generalizing Degree and Shortest Paths", Social networks, 32(3): 245-251.   DOI
21 이도형 (2010), 국가연구개발사업 유형별 성과평가 논리모형 개발에 관한 연구, 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
22 안상진.김혜원.이윤빈 (2013), "국가연구개발사업의 사전 분석틀 표준화 연구 : 연구개발 부문 예비타당성조사 표준지침을 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 16(1): 176-198.
23 안승구.김주일 (2017), 정부연구개발예산 현황분석, 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
24 양승우.최지선.이명화.김재경.권보경.한정선 (2013), "국가연구개발사업 관련 별도 법률 제정 방안", 정책연구, 1-420.
25 이민형.안두현.성경모.이혜진.변영지 (2013), "정부연구개발사업구조 진단 및 개선 방안 (Disgnosis of government R&D program structure and its improvement)", 정책연구, 2013-26.
26 이유진.양위주 (2016), "네트워크 분석방법을 활용한 [관광연구] 의 연구동향 분석", 관광연구, 31(4): 363-383.
27 Palchykov, V., Gemmetto, V., Boyarsky, A. and Garlaschelli, D. (2016), "Ground Truth? Concept-based Communities Versus the External Classification of Physics Manuscripts", EPJ Data Science, 5(1): 28.   DOI
28 Smith, K. (2000), "Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy", Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1): 73-102.   DOI
29 이상엽.박석종.엄익천.김성진.김인자 (2006), 국가연구개발사업 백서, 서울 : 한국과학기술기획평가원.
30 이영석.고영주 (2016), "긴축재정 환경에서 혁신 잠재력 유지를 위한 미국의 연구개발 재정운용 정책변동 : 다중흐름모형을 중심으로", 국가정책연구, 30(4): 111-137.
31 이윤빈.신동평.최배성 (2015), "증거기반 의사결정 적용을 통한 정부 R&D 예산과정 개선 방안 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 144-150.
32 성기서.금영정 (2014), "R&D 제안서 동시분류분석을 활용한 ICT 융합 네트워크 분석", 대한산업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집, 439-450.
33 이정수.길부종.전희성 (2013), "국가연구개발사업 성실실패제도 개선방안", 기술혁신학회지, 16(1): 346-366.
34 이종현.권상숙.정동일.손지호.차은종.여무송.이성종.박귀순 (2013), "한국연구재단과 한국환경산업기술원 간 Eco-Bridge 구축방안에 관한 연구-우수 연구성과 연계 활용으로 부처간 벽 허물기", 대한환경공학회지, 35(8): 533-539.   DOI
35 이철주.이강택.신준석 (2012), "정부지원 중소기업 R&D 프로젝트의 사업화 성과 영향요인 분석: 인증과 특허의 영향을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 20(3): 230-254.
36 Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M. and Gilsing, V. (2005), "A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design", Technovation, 25(6): 609-619.   DOI
37 임성민.정욱 (2014), "국가연구개발사업 예비타당성조사 제도의 평가방식에 대한연구 : 매력적 품질이론의 적용 가능성에 대하여", J Korean Soc Qual Manag, 42(2): 131-144.   DOI
38 전용웅.홍석철.장미.김현철 (2016), "보건의료 국가연구개발사업 기획 프레임 개발", 한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집, 1136-1156.
39 Tijssen, R. J. (1992), "A Quantitative Assessment of Interdisciplinary Structures in Science and Technology: Co-classification Analysis of Energy Research", Research Policy, 21(1): 27-44.   DOI
40 Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), "Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review", British Journal of Management, 14(3): 207-222.   DOI
41 한장협.나중규.김채복 (2015), "특허정보를 활용한 ICT 기술융합 분석과 발전방향에 관한 연구 : 경북지역을 중심으로", 지식재산연구, 10(3): 203-238.
42 전중양.정기덕.정선양 (2013), "국가연구개발사업의 추진.운영에 대한 정책효율성 제고방안연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 5-18.
43 정우진.이상용 (2014), "특허인용정보를 활용한 R&D 융합기술의 성과분석 : IT와 에너지의 융합기술과 타 융합기술과의 비교", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 21(4): 65-96.   DOI
44 조성도.이천무.현병환 (2011), "연구생산성 제고를 위한 국가연구개발사업 지원 방안 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 345-362.
45 황성현 (2017), "산업융합계수를 활용한 융합현상에 관한 연구", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 17(3): 666-674.   DOI
46 e-나라지표 (2017), "정부 연구개발예산", http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1330 (18 March 2017).
47 Arrow, K. (1962), Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity : Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48 Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
49 Borner, K., Chen, C. and Boyack, K. W. (2003), "Visualizing Knowledge Domains", Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1): 179-255.
50 Brown, M. G. and Svenson, R. A. (1998), "Measuring R&D Productivity", Research-Technology Management, 41(6): 30-35.   DOI
51 Freeman, L. C. (1977), "A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness", Sociometry, 40(1): 35-41.   DOI
52 Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D. and Haynes, R. B. (1997), "Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions", Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5): 376-80.   DOI
53 Crespo, J. A., Li, Y. and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013), "The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices Across Scientific Fields", PLoS ONE, 8, e58727.   DOI
54 Fang-Fang, W. E. N. (2016), "Technological Relatedness based on Co-classification Network Analysis: A Case Study on Electricity Sector", Journal of Digital Information Management, 14(1): 26-32.
55 Freeman, L. C. (1979), "Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Classification", Social Networks, 1(3): 215-239.   DOI
56 Lee, W. J ., Lee, W. K. and Sohn, S. Y. (2016), "Patent Network Analysis and Quadratic Assignment Procedures to Identify the Convergence of Robot Technologies", PloS one, 11(10): e0165091.   DOI
57 Hook, P. A. (2007), "Visualizing the Topic Space of the United States Supreme Court", PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS (ISSI 2007); Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 68.
58 Joo, S. H. and Kim, Y. (2010), "Measuring Relatedness between Technological Fields", Scientometrics, 83(2): 435-454.   DOI
59 Lee, J. Y. (2006), "A Study on the Network Generation Methods for Examining the Intellectual Structure of Knowledge Domains", Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2): 333-355.   DOI
60 Lee, Y. B. (2013), "A Study on the Ex-ante Evaluation on Government R&D Programs Using Fuzzy Reasoning", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 28(3): 77-96.