Browse > Article

A Study on Business Ecosystem Model for Technology Commercialization: Focused on Its Application to Public R&D Commercialization  

Park, Wung (한국전자통신연구원)
Park, Ho-Young (한국전자통신연구원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.17, no.4, 2014 , pp. 786-819 More about this Journal
Abstract
Emphasizing the importance of R&D as a source of open innovation, Korean government is developing various programs focused on technology commercialization and is expanding investment on it. In spite of those efforts, technology commercialization is not vitalized yet due to the lack of demand for technology transfer, R&D planning scheme without considering market, immaturity of technology market, and so on. This study aims to suggest the business ecosystem model so that technology commercialization could be facilitated based on business ecosystem perspective. We set the framework for modeling a business ecosystem through reviewing the previous works, and draw several problems to be solved regarding public R&D commercialization in Korea from the perspective of ecosystem. Considering those, this research proposes the business ecosystem model for public R&D commercialization as a reference model for describing, discussing, and developing the technology commercialization strategy. The proposed model consists of 4 domains as follows: R&D, technology market, information distribution channels, and customers. The business ecosystem model shows that technology commercialization could be facilitated to create the market value through close relationship and organic cooperation among its members that form the ecosystem. Public research institutes as a keystone player could control the fate of the ecosystem. In this regard, this paper suggests roles of public research institutes for evolving the business ecosystem.
Keywords
Technology Transfer and Commercialization; Business Ecosystem; Legal system of Technology Commercialization; R&D Policy; Business Ecosystem Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권영관 (2011), 산업기술생태계 관점에서 본 기술이전사업화의 새로운 패러다임, 서울: 한국산업기술진흥원.
2 기술표준원, 한국전자통신연구원 (2013), KATS 표준화 프레임워크 가이드라인 Version 1.0 Rev, 서울: 산업통상자원부 기술표준원.
3 김창욱 외 (2012), 기업생태계와 플랫폼 전략, SERI 연구보고서, 삼성경제연구소.
4 미래창조과학부 (2014a), R&D성과확산을 위한 기술사업화 추진 계획, 서울: 미래창조과학부.
5 미래창조과학부 (2014b), 공공 연구성과 활용 촉진을 위한 기술 가치평가 신뢰도 제고 및 활성화 방안, 서울: 미래창조과학부.
6 미래창조과학부 (2014c), "과학기술정보서비스: 과학기술통계", http://www.ntis.go.kr/ (2014.07.08.).
7 미래창조과학부, 산업통상자원부, 중소기업청 (2014), 정부출연(연)의 중소.중견기업 R&D 전진기지화 방안(안), 서울: 미래창조과학부.
8 산업통상자원부 (2013), "보도자료: 공공연구기관 기술이전사업화 실적 크게 증가", http://www.motie.go.kr/ (2014.07.08.).
9 산업통상자원부 (2014a), "기술의 이전 및 사업화 촉진에 관한 법률".
10 산업통상자원부 (2014b), 제5차 기술이전 및 사업화 촉진 계획(안), 서울: 산업통상자원부.
11 여인국 (2013), 기술사업화 이론과 실제, 파주: 도서출판 학현사.
12 윤종민 (2013), "대학 기술이전.사업화 전담조직 운영제도의 성과와 과제", 기술혁신학회지, 16(4): 1055-1089.
13 이길우 외 (2013), 국가연구개발사업 기술이전.사업화 제고 방안 연구, 서울: 한국과학기술 기획평가원.
14 이성기 (2014), "한국 공공연구기관 기술이전.사업화의 질적성과 제고를 위한 제언", Issue & Focus on IP(2014-4), 한국지식재산연구원, 31-35.
15 이윤준.김선우 (2013), 대학.출연(연)의 기술사업화 활성화 방안, 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
16 한국과학기술기획평가원 (2013), 2012년도 연구개발활동조사보고서.
17 한국산업기술진흥원 (2013), 2013년 기술이전.사업화 조사분석 자료집.
18 한국전자통신연구원 (2014), 2014년도 ETRI 수요예보.
19 한국지식재산연구원, 한국산업기술진흥원 (2012), 2012년 기술이전.사업화 조사분석 자료집.
20 한국지식재산전략원 (2012), 2011년도 정부 R&D 특허성과 조사.분석 보고서, 대전: 특허청.
21 Andersen, B. (2007), Business Process Improvement Toolbox; Second Edition, ASQ Quality Press.
22 Baghbadorani, M. F. and Harandi, A. (2012), "A Conceptual Model for Business Ecosystem and Implication for Future Research", DOI: 10.7763/IPEDR, 52(17): 82-86.
23 Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000), "Strategic Networks", Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203-215.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gulati, R. (1999), "Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation", Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397-420.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. (2004), "Strategy as Ecology", Harvard Business Review, 82(3): 68-78.
26 Jarillo, J. C. (1988), "On Strategic Networks", Strategic Management Journal, 9: 31-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Jolly, V. K. (1997), Commercializing new technologies: Getting from Mind to Market, Harvard Business School Press.
28 Moore, J. F. (1993), "Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition", Harvard Business Review, 71(3): 75-86.
29 Lengnick-Hall, C. A. and Wolff, J. A. (1999), "Similarities and Contradictions in the Core Logic of Three Strategy Research Streams", Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1109-1132.   DOI
30 Mitchell, W. and Singh, K. (1996), "Survival of Businesses Using Collaborative Relationships to Commercialize Complex Goods", Strategic Management Journal, 17(3): 169-195.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Moore, J. F. (1996), The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems, HarperBusiness.
32 Peltoniemi, M. (2006), "Preliminary Theoretical Framework for the Study of Business Ecosystems", Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(1): 10-19.
33 Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage, The Free Press.
34 Powell, W. W. (1990), "Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization", Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
35 Thomas, C. (2008), "Introduction to the OW2 Consortium Business Ecosystems Strategy", OW2 Consortium.