Browse > Article

A Study on the Collaboration Types of Knowledge Creation in Korean Government-supported Research Institutes of S&T: Focusing on Openness and Diversity  

Park, Joohyoung (한국기계연구원, 성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
Lee, Heesang (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.17, no.3, 2014 , pp. 563-583 More about this Journal
Abstract
We classified collaboration types of Government-supported Research Institutes (GRIs) in Korea to make a creation knowledge with the openness and the diversity. The openness is described to collaboration dependence and leading intensity, and the diversity is expressed to collaboration diversity and collaboration concentration. We suggest four taxonomy models explained in terms of the openness and the diversity with country level and institute level. This study uses 39,507 papers in SCOUPS DB that include author(s) affiliated to 26 GRIs. It concludes that many GRIs is classified to the type of multilateral collaboration follower in institute level and to the type of global network player in country level from the perspective of openness. In the aspect of diversity, many GRIs is concentrated to the collaboration type of picky eater or monophagous in institute level and to the multinatioal asymmetry type or non-multinational asymmetry type in country level. It is necessary for GRIs to lead collaboration and to transfer inhouse R&D institutes with high performance to be competitive institutes which make high quality knowledge.
Keywords
Government-supported Research Institutes (GRIs); Knowledge creation; Collaboration; Openness; Diversity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 과기분야 출연(연) 발전전략 TF (2013), 창조경제 실현을 위한 출연(연) 발전전략 보고서.
2 국가과학기술심의회 (2013), "출연(연) 개방형 협력 생태계 조성을 위한 과학기술분야 연구회 기능 재정립 방향(안)", 제4회 안건.
3 김명순.유제훈.고재상.이영덕 (2000), "국가출연연구기관의 지식자산 모델", 기술혁신연구, 8(1): 197-216.
4 김성홍 (2007), 개방형 기술혁신을 위한 산업법 혁신 네트워크 구축전략 수립, 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.
5 미래창조과학부 (2013), "과학기술과 ICT를 통한 창조경제와 국민행복 실현", 2013년도 업무보고.
6 성지은 (2002), "탈추격 혁신을 위한 출연(연)의 구조적 한계와 과제: ETRI를 중심으로", 기술 혁신연구, 20(2): 1-28.
7 이달환 (1996), 이공계 출연(연)의 역할 및 운영개선 방안, 서울: 과학기술정책관리연구소.
8 Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T. and Silverman, B. S. (2000), "Don't Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups' Performance in Canadian Biotechnology", Strategic Manangement Journal, 21(3): 267-294.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Chesbrough, H. and Appleyard, M. M. (2007), "Open Innovation and Strategy", California Management Review, 50(1): 57-76.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Cronin, B., Shaw, D. and Barre, K. L. (2004), "Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work: Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 160-168.   DOI
11 Cummings, J. N. (2004), "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization", Management Science, 50(3): 352-364.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Egghe, L. (1991), "Theory of Collaboration and Collaborative Measures", Information Processing & Management, 27(2/3): 177-202.   DOI
13 Faems, D., Looy, B. V. and Debackere, K. (2005), "Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation : Toward a Portfolio Approach", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3): 238-250.   DOI
14 Gauffriau, M. and Larsen, P. O. (2005), "Counting Methods Are Decisive for Rankings Based on Publication and Citation Studies", Scientometrics, 64(1): 85-93.   DOI
15 Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. and Salgado, J. F. (2009), "Team-level Predictors of Innovation at Work; A Comprehensive Meta-analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research", Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1128-1145.   DOI
16 Hagedoorn, J. (1993), "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Nterorganizational Models of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences", Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 371-385.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hagedoorn, J., Roijakkers, N. and Van Kranenburg, H. (2006), "Inter-Firm R&D Networks: The Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High-Tech Partnership Formation", British Journal of Management, 17(1): 39-53.   DOI
18 Huang, M., Lin, C. and Chen, D. (2011), "Counting Methods, Country Rank Changes, and Counting Inflation in the Assessment of National Research Productivity and Impact", Journal of the american society for information science and technology, 62(12): 2427-2436.   DOI
19 Kavadias, S. and Sommer, S. C. (2009), "The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness", Management Science, 55(12): 1899-1913.   DOI
20 Katz, J. S. and Hicks D. (1997), "How Much Is a Collaboration Worth? A Calibrated Bibliometric Model", Scientometrics, 40(3): 541-554.   DOI
21 Klomp, L. and Van Leeuwen, G. (2001), "Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3): 343-364.   DOI
22 Kwon, K., Park, H. W., So, M. and Leydesdorff, L. (2012), "Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea's National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-authorship Relationships in South Korea", Scientometrics, 90(1): 163-176.   DOI
23 Larsen, P. O. (2008), "The State of the Art in Publication Counting", Scientometrics, 77(2): 235-251.   DOI
24 Lauren, K. and Sater, A. (2006), "Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms", Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Park, G. and Kang, J. (2013), "Alliance Addiction: Do Alliances Create Real Benefits?", Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(1): 53-66.   DOI
26 Love, J. and Roper, S. (1999), "The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects", Review of Industrial Organization, 15(1): 43-64.   DOI
27 Liu, H., Chang, B. and Chen, K. (2012), "Collaboration Patterns of Taiwanese Scientific Publications in Various Research Areas", Scientometrics, 92(1): 145-155.   DOI
28 Moody, J. (2004), "The Structure of Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999", American Sociological Review, 69(2): 213-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011), "The Impact of Technological Relatedness, Prior Ties, and Geographical Distance on University-industry Collaborations: A Joint-patent Analysis", Technovation, 31(7): 355-379.
30 Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, D. and Petteault, M. (2007) "Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity", Scientometrics, 72(1): 117-147.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Subramanyam, K. (1983), "Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review", Journal of Information Sciene, 6(1): 33-38.   DOI
32 Teodorescu, D. and Andrei, T. (2011), "The Growth of International Collaboration in East European Scholarly Communities: A Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Articles Published between 1989 and 2009", Scientometrics, 89(2): 711-722.   DOI
33 Witzeman, S., Slowinski, G., Dirkx, R., Gollob, L., Tao, J., Ward S. and Miraglia S. (2006), "Harnessing External Technology for Innovation", Research Technology Management, 49(3): 19-27.