Browse > Article

The Case Study on the Niche Experimentation in Offshore Wind Renewable Energy Transition  

Kim, Bonggyun (고려대학교 그린스쿨(한국에너지기술평가원))
Kim, Dukyoung (고려대학교 그린스쿨((주)에코아이))
Kim, Kyungnam (고려대학교 그린스쿨)
Kim, Donghwan (고려대학교 그린스쿨)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.17, no.2, 2014 , pp. 355-379 More about this Journal
Abstract
For the transition to the low carbon society, it is inevitable but difficult journey that the new energy technology spread co-exists with formal social system. The objective of offshore wind power plant that has been implemented by the government is to connect large capacity new renewable energy to the central electric power system. Therefore, for the successful introduction of offshore wind power system, the transition of the formal social technology system should be companied. This study analysis the energy system transition about niche strategy adjustment using Multiple Level Perspectives & Strategic Niche Management. It also multi level analyzes and structuralizes the process that new technology, as a research result, evolves through connecting and communicating with formal regime and landscape. Also, adjusting Strategic Niche Management, it diagnoses the obstructive factors in the initial stage of niche experiment and found the major reasons why offshore wind power test plant had been delayed. Through this study, it reaches to the practical implication that offshore niche technology could grow stably in the energy system and various policies.
Keywords
New Renewable Energy Technology; Offshore Wind Power; Energy Transition; Social.Technology System; System Transition; Strategy Niche Management; Multi-Level Perspective;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 국가에너지위원회 (2008), 제1차 국가에너지기본계획(2008-2030), 서울.
2 국회예산정책처 (2010), 신재생에너지보급사업평가, 서울.
3 권태형 (2012), "신재생에너지 시장확대를 위한 정책수단의 비교", 정부학연구, 18(1).
4 김병윤 (2008), "네덜란드의 에너지전환", STEPI Working Paper, WP-2008-08.
5 김태은 (2009), "제도변화와 대체요인으로서 딜레마 대응에 관한 연구: 신, 재생에너지 발전차액지원제도를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 43(4): 179-208.
6 박동오.송위진 (2008), "지속가능한 기술을 향한 새로운 접근", 과학기술학연구, 8(2): 57-81.
7 박상욱 (2011), "수소경제 실현가능성 제고를 위한 전략적 니치 관리", 한국수소 및 신에너지 학회 논문집.
8 산업통상자원부 (2008), 제3차 신재생에너지 기술개발 및 이용보급 계획, 서울.
9 산업통상자원부 (2008), 제4차 전력수급기본계획, 서울.
10 산업통상자원부 (2011), 서남해 2.5GW 해상풍력 종합추진계획, 서울.
11 산업통상자원부 (2011), 해상풍력추진로드맵, 서울.
12 산업통상자원부 (2013), 제6차 전력수급기본계획, 서울.
13 성지은.정병걸.송위진 (2012), "지속가능한 사회기술시스템으로의 전환과 백캐스팅-네덜란드의 지속가능한 교통.식품.가정 시스템 전환 사례를 중심으로", 과학기술학 연구, 2.
14 송성수 (2002), "한국 과학기술정책의 특성에 관한 시론적 고찰", 과학기술학연구, 2(1).
15 송위진 (2001), "기술선택의 정치과정과 기술학습", 과학기술학연구, 1(1): 179-200.
16 송위진 (2003), "사회기술시스템과 과학기술혁신정책", 한국기술혁신학회, 16(1).
17 신정희 (2011), "에너지공급에 있어 국가의 과제와 지속가능한 재생에너지 보급촉진제도", 부산대 법학연구, 52(4).
18 에너지경제연구원 (2010), 유럽의 해상풍력 정책방향에 관한 연구, 산업통상자원부.
19 오오시마 겐이치 (2013), 재생에너지의 정치경제학, 아카데미프레스.
20 이재훈 (2010), 녹색성장과 에너지자원전략, 서울: 나남출판.
21 임성진 (2005), "지구온난화방지를 위한 독일의 에너지정책", 국제정치논총, 45(3).
22 조성봉.김진우 (2000), 전력산업의 개혁방향과 주요 정책과제, 에너지경제연구원.
23 한국수력원자력 (2013), 원자력발전백서, 서울.
24 BTM Consulting (2011), Offshore Wind Energy Operation and Maintenance, Wind Energy Update.
25 한국에너지기술평가원 (2013), 해상풍력기반조성연구, 산업통상자원부.
26 Bijker, W., Hughes, T and Pinch, T.(eds) (1987), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27 Bosselman, F. (2006), "Energy, Economics and the Environment: Cases and Materials", Energy, Economics and the Environment: Cases and Materlals, Foundation Press.
28 de Vivero, Juan, L. S. and Inmaculada, M. A. (2007), "An exercise in Stakeholder Analysis for a hypothetical offshore wind farm in the Gulf of Cadix", Science and Policy Integration for COastal System Assessment, SPICOSA Draft Report.
29 Dexia Hypothekenbank Berlin AG (2007), Alternative Energies, Equtiy Research Sector Report.
30 Dosi, G. (1982), "Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change", Research policy, 11(3): 147-162.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Elzen, B., Geels, F.W. and Green, K. (2004), "System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory", Evidence and Policy, Edward Elgar.
32 EZ (2004), Innovation in Energy policy : Energy Transition : State of Affairs and the Way ahead.
33 Fisher, M. L. (1997), "What is the Right Supply Chain for your Product?", Harvard business review, 75: 105-117.
34 Geels, and Frank W. (2002), "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study", Research policy, 31(8): 1257-1274.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Geels, and Frank W. (2004) "Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis, System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory", evidence and policy, (2004): 19-47.
36 Geels, and Frank W. (2004), "From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory", Research policy, 33(6): 897-920.   DOI
37 Lundvall, B. (1992), "National System of Innovation-Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning", Research Policy, 24(2): 320.
38 Geels, F.W. and Raven, R. P. J. M. (2007), "Socio-cognitive Evolution and Co-Evolution in Competing Technical Trajectories: Biogas Development in Denmark (1970-2002)", International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1): 63-77.   DOI
39 IEA (2011), Energy Prices & Taxes, 4th Quarter, OECD.
40 Kemp, R. and Loorbach, D. (2005), "Dutch Policies to Manage the Transition to Sustainable Energy", in Jahrbuch Okologische Okonomik 4 Innovationen und Nachhaltigkeit, MetropolisVerlag, Marburg, 123-150.
41 Mah, Ngar-yin (2012), "Governing the Transition of Socio-Technical Systems : A Case Study of the Development of Smart Grids in Koera", Energy policy, 45: 133-144.   DOI
42 Malerba, F. (2002), "Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production", Research policy, 31(2): 247-264.   DOI
43 Nelson, R. R. and Sidney, G. w. (1982), "An evolutionary theory of economic change", Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
44 Pavitt (1984), "Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxanomy and Theory", Research Policy, 13(6): 343-373.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Sterrenberg (2013), Low Carbon Transition through system innovation : theoretical notions and application, pioneers into practice mentoring program.
46 Van der Linden (2005), "Review of international experience with renewable energy obligation support mechanisms", Netherlands: Petten, ECN-C-05-025.