Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2022.25.2.55

Substitute Textile Preferences for Eco-Friendly Leather Goods: Focusing on Shoes and Bags  

Kim, Ji-Soo (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University)
Na, Young-Joo (Department of Clothing & Textiles, Inha University)
Publication Information
Science of Emotion and Sensibility / v.25, no.2, 2022 , pp. 55-70 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the 21st century, the demand for eco-friendly leather, such as eco-leather and vegan leather, is steadily increasing. This study examines the influence of eco-friendliness on consumers' purchasing intentions and the possibility of eco-friendly changes in the fashion accessory market, which is dominated by leather material and leather substitutes. This study administered a questionnaire survey to 227 males and females between 20 and 60 years of age in Korea. With a 5-point Likert scale, data were collected on evaluation criteria when purchasing shoes and bags and purchasing intention of various leather substitute materials according to the democratic variables. The eco-friendliness attitude was divided into eco-consciousness and green behavior. As the eco-friendly attitude increased, most purchasing standards increased, but the purchasing criteria, such as trends, brands, and prices, did not correlate with the eco-friendly attitude. The eco-consciousness of a consumer had a high correlation with the design evaluation criteria, while the green behavior of the consumer aligned with durability and comfort criteria when purchasing a bag. There was a preference for recycled leather, vegetable leather, synthetic leather, and chemical leather, and the fabric type was ranked as natural fiber, biodegradable fiber, and synthetic fiber. Consumers with both green behavior and eco-consciousness are more likely to purchase biodegradable textiles and vegetable leather for the material of shoes and bags.
Keywords
Eco-friendly Leather; Vegan; Sustainability; Purchasing Intention;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40(1), 37-48.   DOI
2 Park, H. R. (2015). The consumers' evaluative criteria of quality on the organic clothes and their purchase intention. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 16(11), 8001-8011.   DOI
3 Rausch, T. M., & Kopplin, C. S. (2021). Bridge the gap: Consumers' purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 1-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882   DOI
4 Yu, J. H., & Kim, M. K. (2012). A study on the evaluation of environment-friendly fashion product attributes-Focused on the objective and the subjective attributes. Journal of the Korea Fashion and Costume Design Association, 14(2), 113-125.
5 Kim, Y. S. (2006). A model of the antecedents of consumers' green purchase behavior. Asia Marketing Journal, 8(2), 1-26.
6 Kleinhueckelkotten, S., & Neitzke, H. (2019). Social acceptability of more sustainable alternatives in clothing consumption. Sustainability, 11(22), 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su11226194   DOI
7 Amalia, C., Irfani, A., Dea Nataya, E., Susanto, G. G., Putra, P. J., Lestari, S. G., & Taufik, I. (2019). Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Based microbial cellulose as advanced biomaterial for sustainable leather production. Suranaree Journal of Science & Technology, 26(1).
8 Bang, S. K. (2003). A study on fashion accessory consumer's purchasing behavior: Focusing on women's shoes and handbag. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
9 Han, D., Kim, J., & Na, Y. (2013). Female clustering & characteristics according to environmental attitude and eco-clothing purchase. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 15(5), 815-824.   DOI
10 Karell, E., & Niinimaki, K. (2020). A mixed-method study of design practices and designers' roles in sustainable-minded clothing companies. Sustainability, 12(11), 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/su12114680   DOI
11 Kim. J. Y., & Kim. S. A. (2017). A study on characteristics of purchase evaluation criteria according to 40-50s' male shoes market segmentation. Journal of Integrated Design Research, 16(4), 81-90.   DOI
12 Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189-204.   DOI
13 Moon, S. J., & Lee, S. H. (2013). Effects of consumer's eco-mark perception on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Studies, 24(1), 99-123.
14 Son, M. Y., & Yoon, N. (2016). Effects of consumer innovativeness on the evaluation of the online fashion advertisement sustainability. Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 19(2), 43-54. DOI: 10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.2.43   DOI
15 Seok, H. J., & Kim, I. S. (2005). Attitudes inward clothing and green store usage, followed by green store user's consciousness of the environment. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 43(6), 171-182.
16 Su, J., Watchravesringkan, K. T., Zhou, J., & Gil, M. (2019). Sustainable clothing: Perspectives from US and Chinese young millennials. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(11), 1141-1162. DOI: 10.1108/IJRDM-09-2017-0184   DOI
17 Wayne, J. "What is vegetable tanned leather?" available at: https://jacksonwayne.com/pages/what-is-vegetable-tanned-leather (accessed 29 March 2021).
18 Wood, J. (2019). Bio-inspiration in fashion-a review. Biomimetics, 4(1), 16.
19 Yoon, S., & Lee, H. (2018). A study on the sustainable environment-friendly leather materials. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 24(4), 251-262. DOI: 10.18208/ksdc.2018.24.4.251   DOI