Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2020.23.1.69

A Comparative Study of the Use of Intelligent Personal Assistant Services Experiences: Siri, Google Assistant, Bixby  

Yoo, Cho-Rong (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정)
Kim, Song-Hyun (연세대학교 인지과학협동과정)
Kim, Jin-Woo (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정)
Publication Information
Science of Emotion and Sensibility / v.23, no.1, 2020 , pp. 69-78 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compares and analyzes user experiences of intelligent personal assistant services based on the evaluation criteria of human-computer interaction to explore positive elements of user experiences and factors that could be improved. The research was conducted on Apple's Siri, Google's Google Associate, and Samsung's Bixby, which is presently the smartest personal assistant service on the market. The research method was to compare and analyze the concepts and characteristics of the current services through a literature review and by interviewing seven UI/UX design experts for the second 2 weeks using contextual inquiry. The interview reorganized Peter Morville's user experience honeycomb, reducing his seven usability principles down to five, asking questions about usability, convenience, visual attractiveness, reliability, and satisfaction. On the basis of the reconfigured usability principle, the assessment was conducted on the basis of the assessment timing and the system usability scale. This study is meaningful in that it analyzed the user experience of artificial intelligence personal assistant services both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Keywords
Intelligent Personal Assistant; Artificial Intelligence; User Interface; User Experience; Usability Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.
2 Chae, H. S., Hong, J. Y., Jeon, M. H., & Han, K. H. (2007). A study on voice user interface for domestic appliance, Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 10(1), 55-68.
3 Jiang, J., Hassan Awadallah, A., Jones, R., Ozertem, U., Zitouni, I., Gurunath Kulkarni, R., & Khan, O. Z. (2015). Automatic online evaluation of intelligent assistants. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. (pp. 506-516). DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741669
4 Kim, J. W. (2005). Human computer interaction an introduction to the place, Seoul: Ahn graphics, 639.
5 Sauro, J. (2011). Measuring usability with the system usability scale (SUS).
6 Morville, P. (2004). User experience honeycomb. Web Log Post] Retrieved from Http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.Php, 21, 09-12.
7 Park, J. H. (2017). Ux understanding of the assessment and analysis, [KIIP] Books by the Korea Intellectual Property Institute DB, 135-137.
8 Richard, W. (2015). Artificial intelligence: A virtual assistant for life. Financial Times.
9 Yang, H. T., & Kim, D. B. (2017). Trends of intelligent personal assistant market and prospect of domestic industry impact. Trends and Issues, 35, 1-30.
10 Lee, A. R. (2017). Industry trends in intelligent virtual secretary services. Convergence Research Policy Center, 9-10.