1 |
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1221.
DOI
|
2 |
Bonnefon, J., Shariff A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573-1576. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2654
DOI
|
3 |
Byun, S. (2017). An approach to ethical guidelines of autonomous vehicle. Journal of Ethics, 112, 199-216. DOI: 10.15801/je.1.112.201703.199
|
4 |
Chae, J. (2017). The effects of shopping value, ease of use, and usefulness on mobile purchase intention. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 20(2), 73-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2017.20.2.73
DOI
|
5 |
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclination in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216-235. DOI: 10.1037/a0031021.
DOI
|
6 |
Choi, N., Ahn, R., & Na, G. (2011). A Study of thinking style and consumption behavior in comsumer's decision making. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 14(2), 279-292.
|
7 |
Fitzsimons, G. M, & Shah, J. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(2), 319-337. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
DOI
|
8 |
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
DOI
|
9 |
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
DOI
|
10 |
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062872
DOI
|
11 |
Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-Process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 581-584. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.003
DOI
|
12 |
Greene. J. D. (2016). Our driverless dilemma: When should your car be willing to kill you? Science, 352(6393), 1514-1515. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf9534
DOI
|
13 |
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
DOI
|
14 |
Hart, W., & Albarracin, D. (2009). The effects of chronic motivation and achievement primes on the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1129-1141. DOI: 10.1037/a0017146
DOI
|
15 |
Joo, M., & Lee, J. (2013). Differential effects of self-relevance levels on framing effects in decision making, Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 16(2), 177-186.
|
16 |
Karnoukos, S. (2018). Self-driving car acceptance and the role of ethics. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 99, 1-14. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2018.2877307
|
17 |
Koop, G. J. (2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgement and Decision Making, 8(5), 527-539.
|
18 |
Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., & Cusimano, C. (2015). Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 117-124. DOI: 10.1145/2696454.2696458
|
19 |
Lee, J. (2016). How the technology of autonomous driving affects the scope and level of driver's duty of care and the necessity for embedding ethical ability in autonomous vehicles. Hongik Law Review, 17(4), 445-472. DOI: 10.16960/jhlr.17.4.201612.443
|
20 |
Maio, G. R., Pakizeh, A., Cheung, W.-Y., & Rees, K. J. (2009). Changing, priming, acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 699-715. DOI: 10.1037/a0016420
DOI
|
21 |
Nees, M. A. (2016). Acceptance of self-driving cars: An examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self-driving car acceptance scale. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 1449-1453. DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601332
|
22 |
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
DOI
|
23 |
Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying the theory of integrated value systems (Vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
24 |
Sutfeld, R., Gast, R., Konig, P., & Gordon, P. (2017). Using virtual reality to assess ethical decisions in road traffic scenarios: Applicability of value-of-life-based models and influences of time pressure. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00122.
|
25 |
Waldrop, M. M. (2015). Autonomous vehicles: No drivers required. Nature, 518(7357), 20-23. DOI: 10.1038/518020a.
DOI
|