Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2018.22.1.3

Social Exclusion, Raising Companion Animals, and Psychological Well-Being: An Exploratory Study  

Lee, Guk-Hee (경기대학교 교양학부)
Publication Information
Science of Emotion and Sensibility / v.22, no.1, 2019 , pp. 3-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
This exploratory study investigated the effects of the interaction between the experience of social exclusion and the presence or absence of a companion animal on the psychological well-being of individuals. Participants answered questions about whether or not they were respected by the community (yes or no); whether or not they currently have a companion animal (yes or no); and if they do, what kind of animal(s) they raise (multiple answers allowed). The study also assessed the psychological well-being of the participants. The group that experienced social exclusion demonstrated lower levels of psychological well-being than the group that did not. In addition, the group that reported the presence of at least one companion animal evinced higher levels of psychological well-being than the group that did not. Individuals who experienced social exclusion but lived with at least one companion animal were found to display superior psychological well-being than those who could not avail of the company of an animal. No difference in psychological well-being was found between those with a companion animal and those without one in the group that did not experience social exclusion. In conclusion, this study observed the effects of the binary interactions between social exclusion (experienced vs. not experienced) and the existence of companion animals (presence vs. absence) on the psychological well-being of people. The empirical data offer theoretical implications for the conditions in which companion animals do or do not improve psychological well-being in humans.
Keywords
Companion Animal; Happiness; Psychological Well-Being; Psycho-Social Needs; Social Exclusion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65(1), 14-23. DOI: 10.1159/000289026   DOI
2 Slatter, J., Lloyd, C., & King, R. (2012). Homelessness and companion animals: More than just a pet? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(8), 377-383. DOI: 10.4276/030802212X13433105374350   DOI
3 Serpell, J. A. (2006). Animal companions and human well-being: An historical exploration of the value of human-animal relationships. In Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-19). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369484-3/50003-7
4 Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective wellbeing around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354-365. DOI: 10.1037/a0023779   DOI
5 The Children's Society. (2018). The good childhood report 2018. London: The Children's Society.
6 Trepanier, S. G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2013). Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Work & Stress, 27(2), 123-140. DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2013.782158   DOI
7 Turner, W. G. (2006). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11-21. DOI: 10.1300/J039v09n04_02   DOI
8 Walsh, F. (2009). Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48(4), 462-480. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x   DOI
9 Waterman, A. S. (1990). The relevance of Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia for the psychological study of happiness. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), 39-44. DOI: 10.1037/h0091489   DOI
10 Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063   DOI
11 Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1159-1173. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017   DOI
12 Zasloff, R. L. (1996). Measuring attachment to companion animals: A dog is not a cat is not a bird. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1), 43-48. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01009-2   DOI
13 Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1991). The relationship between sense of community and subjective well-being: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 19(3), 246-253. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(199107) 19:3<246::AID-JCOP2290190308>3.0.CO;2-L   DOI
14 Bao, K. J., & Schreer, G. (2016). Pets and happiness: Examining the association between pet ownership and wellbeing. Anthrozoos, 29(2), 283-296. DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152721   DOI
15 Boldt, M. A., & Dellmann-Jenkins, M. (1992). The impact of companion animals in later life and considerations for practice. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 11(2), 228-239. DOI: 10.1177/073346489201100208   DOI
16 Beck, A. M., & Meyers, N. M. (1996). Health enhancement and companion animal ownership. Annual Review of Public Health, 17(1), 247-257. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.001335   DOI
17 Garrity, T. F., Stallones, L. F., Marx, M. B., & Johnson, T. P. (1989). Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoos, 3(1), 35-44. DOI: 10.2752/089279390787057829   DOI
18 Garrity, T. F., & Stallones, L. (1998). Effects of pet contact on human well-being: Review of recent research. In C. C. Wilson & D. C. Turner (Eds.), Companion animals in human health (pp. 3-22). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9781452232959.n1
19 Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52-61. DOI: 10.1037/a0018066   DOI
20 Herzog, H. (2011). The impact of pets on human health and psychological well-being: fact, fiction, or hypothesis?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 236-239. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411415220   DOI
21 Kanat-Maymon, Y., Antebi, A., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2016). Basic psychological need fulfillment in human-pet relationships and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 69-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.025   DOI
22 Lee, G. (2018b). The key to leisure is human relationships: Social exclusion, active leisure, and passive leisure. Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation, & Park, 42(3), 1-11. DOI: 10.26446/kjlrp.2018.9.42.3.1
23 Kim, M., Kim, H., & Cha, K. (2001). Analyses on the construct of psychological well-being (PWB) of Korean male and female adults. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 15(2), 19-39.
24 Lago, D., Delaney, M., Miller, M., & Grill, C. (1989). Companion animals, attitudes toward pets, and health outcomes among the elderly: A long-term follow-up. Anthrozoos, 3(1), 25-34. DOI: 10.2752/089279390787057793   DOI
25 Lee, G. & Choi. I. (2018). Effects of social exclusion on intention, meaning, and pleasure in leisure. Journal of Social Science (Institute of Social Science, Chungnam National University), 29(4), 41-59. DOI: 10.16881/jss.2018.10.29.4.41   DOI
26 Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St Leger, L. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45-54. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dai032   DOI
27 McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 61-70. DOI: 10.1348/000712600161673   DOI
28 Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303-322. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7   DOI
29 OECD. (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264191655-en
30 O'Haire, M. (2010). Companion animals and human health: Benefits, challenges, and the road ahead. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 5(5), 226-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.02.002   DOI
31 Raina, P., Waltner-Toews, D., Bonnett, B., Woodward, C., & Abernathy, T. (1999). Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: An analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(3), 323-329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02996.x   DOI
32 Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419-435. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200266002   DOI
33 Lee, G. (2018a). Effect of social exclusion on the intention to purchase recommended or popular products. Journal of Marketing Studies, 26(3), 1-18. DOI: 10.21191/jms.26.3.01   DOI
34 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.   DOI
35 Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139-170. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68   DOI
36 Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069   DOI
37 Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719   DOI