Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14695/KJSOS.2015.18.3.49

Effects of Guilt Appeal Level and Personal Disposition on Responses to International Relief Messages  

Lee, Seungjo (School of Media & Communication, Chung-Ang University)
Lee, Hankyu (School of Media & Communication, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Science of Emotion and Sensibility / v.18, no.3, 2015 , pp. 49-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigates the interactive effects of guilt appeal level and empathic disposition (personal distress/empathic concern) on responses over the international relief messages. Guilt appeal level refers to the high or low degree of a message eliciting guilty feeling from the recipient. Empathic disposition is defined as personal tendency to assimilate and concern about the experience of others and we used two sub-dimensions, empathic concern and personal distress. The experiment was composed of two steps. At the first step, the participants rated the personal disposition measures and at the second step, they were shown one of the relief messages with different guilt level. Thus, the whole experiment was guilt appeal level ${\times}$ personal traits factorial design on guilty feeling, attitudes and behavioral intention. The results showed that guilt appeal level interacted with the personal distress disposition on the responses. The interaction was induced mainly from the differences of personal distress in the condition of high guilt appeal. High empathic concern individuals showed more favorable attitudes and behavioral intention regardless of the appeal conditions compared to low empathic concern individuals.
Keywords
International Relief Message; Guilt Appeal; Personality; Personal Distress; Empathic Concern;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23(12), 1035-1054.   DOI
2 Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(1), 1-23.   DOI
3 Batson, C. D., & Ahman, N. (2001). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma II: What if the target of empathy has defected? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 25-36.   DOI
4 Batson, C. D., Sager, K., Garst, E., Kang, M., Rubchinsky, K., & Dawson, K. (1997). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 495-509.   DOI
5 Baumann, D. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (1981). Altruism as hedonism: Helping and self-gratification as equivalent responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(6), 1039-1046.   DOI
6 Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological bulletin, 115(2), 243-267.   DOI
7 Bekkers, R. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26(3), 439-454.   DOI
8 Bennett, R. (1998). Shame, guilt & responses to nonprofit & public sector ads. International Journal of Advertising, 17(4), 483-499.   DOI
9 Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12-29.   DOI
10 Boster, F. J., Mitchell, M. M., Lapinski, M. K., Cooper, H., Orrego, V. O., & Reinke, R. (1999). The impact of guilt and type of compliance-gaining message on compliance. Communication Monographs, 66(2), 168-177.   DOI
11 Bozinoff, L., & Ghingold, M. (1983). Evaluating guilt arousing marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 243-255.   DOI
12 Burnett, M. S., & Lunsford, D. A. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33-43   DOI
13 Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 450-458.   DOI
14 Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44.   DOI
15 Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910-2935.   DOI
16 Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494.   DOI
17 Coulter, R. H., & Pinto, M. B. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: What are their effects? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(6), 697-705.   DOI
18 Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. L., & Vincent, J. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 502-516.   DOI
19 Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 749-758.   DOI
20 Cotte, J., Coulter, R. A., & Moore, M. (2005). Enhancing or disrupting guilt: The role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 361-368.   DOI
21 Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
22 Davis, M. H. (2005). Becoming (and remaining) a community volunteer: Does personality matter? In: A. Omoto (Eds.), Processes of community change and social action. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 67-82.
23 Dietrich, D. M., & Berkowitz, L. (1997). Alleviation of dissonance by engaging in prosocial behavior or receiving ego-enhancing feedback. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 557-566.
24 Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143-180.   DOI
25 Etxebarria, I., & Apodaca, P. (2008). Both Freud and Hoffman are right: Anxious-aggressive and empathic dimensions of guilt. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 159-171.   DOI
26 Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 40(1), 121.   DOI
27 Eum, Y., Eom, J. S., Park, K. B., & Sohn, J. H. (2011). Role of anxiety in concealed information test: An fMRI study. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 14(2), 227-234.
28 Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of anti-drug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 238-245.   DOI
29 Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723-742.   DOI
30 Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31 Huhmann, B. A., & Brotherton, T. P. (1997). A content analysis of guilt appeals in popular magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 26(2), 35-46.   DOI
32 Ickes, W., Snyder, M., & Garcia, S. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In: R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 165-195.
33 Konoske, P., Staple, S., & Graf, R. G. (1979). Compliant reactions to guilt: Self-esteem or self-punishment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 108(2), 207-211.   DOI
34 Krevans, J., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Parents' use of inductive discipline: Relations to children's empathy and pro-social behavior. Child development, 67(6), 3263-3277.   DOI
35 Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 853-866.   DOI
36 Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic Review, 58(3), 419-438.
37 Lindsey, L. L. M. (2005). Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation: An examination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrow donation. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 453-481.
38 Lindsey, L. L. M., Yun, K. A., & Hill, J. B. (2007). Anticipated guilt as motivation to help unknown others: An examination of empathy as a moderator. Communication Research, 34(4), 468-480.   DOI
39 Mosher, D. L. (1965). Interaction of fear and guilt in inhibiting unacceptable behavior. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(2), 161-167.   DOI
40 O'Keefe, D. J. (2000). Guilt and social influence. In: M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 67-101.
41 O'Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In: J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 329-344.
42 O'Keefe, D. J., & Figge, M. (1999). Guilt and expected guilt in the door-in-the-face technique. Communication Monographs, 66(4), 312-324.   DOI
43 Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M. T., Everett, M. W., Baseheart, J. R., & Francies, R. (2002). Perceived message sensation value (PMSV) and the dimensions and validation of a PMSV scale. Health Communication, 14(4), 403-428.   DOI
44 Ruiz, S., & Sicilia, M. (2004). The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 657-664.   DOI
45 Paterson, H., Reniers, R., & Vollm, B. (2009). Personality types and mental health experiences of those who volunteer for help-lines. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(4), 459-471.   DOI
46 Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.   DOI
47 Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229-255.   DOI
48 Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(4), 433-467.   DOI
49 Sturmer, S., Snyder, M., Kropp, A., & Siem, B. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 943-956.   DOI
50 Sung, Y. S., Kim, J., & Kang, J. (2014). An ERP study on charitable donation ad effects: Mental imagery and attention. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 17(2), 3-12.   DOI
51 Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In: J. P. Tangney, & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford Press, 114-139.
52 Wang, X. (2011). The role of anticipated guilt in intentions to register as organ donors and to discuss organ donation with family. Health Communication, 26(8), 683-690.   DOI
53 Trommsdorff, G., Friedlmeier, W., & Mayer, B. (2007). Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 284-293.   DOI
54 Unger, L. S., & Thumuluri, L. K. (1997). Trait empathy and continuous helping: The case of voluntarism. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12(3), 785-800.
55 Vitaglione, G. D., & Barnett, M. A. (2003). Assessing a new dimension of empathy: Empathic anger as a predictor of helping and punishing desires. Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 301-325.   DOI