Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9766/KIMST.2019.22.4.567

Research of Schedule Managing and Forecasting for Project Progress Method in Defense Research & Development using Earned Schedule Concept  

Cho, Jungho (R&D Programming Directorate, Agency for Defense Development)
Ryu, Sangchul (R&D Programming Directorate, Agency for Defense Development)
Lim, Jaesung (Department of NCW Engineering, Graduate School, Ajou University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology / v.22, no.4, 2019 , pp. 567-574 More about this Journal
Abstract
Traditional project progress method(PPM) has been used for Korean defense research and development project management for the last 20 years. However, it is difficult to intuitively understand the performance in terms of the project schedule, because the PPM does not provide the function of managing and forecasting project schedule. Therefore, this paper proposes new schedule managing and forecasting function for the PPM using earned schedule management concept. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed functions through several defense projects and prove that it is possible to reinforce the schedule management function of the PPM.
Keywords
Project Progress Method; Earned Schedule Management; Schedule Performance Index; Schedule Estimate at Completion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Whitehouse, G. E., “Project Management Techniques,” Industrial Engineer, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 24-29, 1973.
2 "Program Evaluation Research Task, Summary Report," Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., USA, pp. 1-118, 1958.
3 Q. W. Fleming and J. M. Koppelman, "Earned Value Project Management - 3rd edition," Project Management Institute Inc. USA, pp. 54-60, 2005.
4 Jaewon Kim, et. al., "Proposal of the Project Management Procedure," Research & Development Report, RDPD-405-011428, Agency for Defense Development, Korea, pp. 138-142, 2001.
5 "Yearly Project Planning Guidance," Regulation No. 297, Agency for Defense Development, Korea, October, pp. 1-11, 2008.
6 "Quarterly Evaluation Analysis Task Guidance," Regulation No. 296, Agency for Defense Development, Korea, October, pp. 1-19, 2008.
7 "Scientific Project Management Execution Guidance," Regulation No. 367, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Korea, March, pp. 1-22, 2017.
8 H. Jeon, et. al., "EVM Application Upgrade Plan," Security Management Institute, pp. 74-84, October, 2017.
9 Walt Lipke, "Schedule is Different," The Measurable News, pp. 31-34, Summer, 2003.
10 J. Cho and J. Lim, “An Analysis of Effect and Limitation when Adapting Earned Schedule Method for Schedule Management and Estimation in Korean Defense Research & Development Projects,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 396-402, 2018.   DOI
11 Jungho Cho and Jungyu Park, "A Comparison Analysis between SPI in EVM Techniques and Rate of Progress for Project in ADD," KIMST Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 1508-1509, June, 2016.
12 Suqrat Babar, et. al., "Estimated Cost at Completion: Integrating Risk into Earned Value Management," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 143, No. 3, 04016104, pp. 1-11, 2017.
13 Jordy Batselier and Mario Vanhoucke, "Empirical Evaluation of Earned Value Management Forecasting Accuracy for Time and Cost," Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 141, No. 11, 05015010, pp. 1-13, 2015.
14 "Earned Value Management Systems EIA-748-D Intent Guide," National Defense Industrial Association, August, pp. 1-56, 2018.
15 Stephan Vandevoorde and Mario Vanhoucke, “A Comparison of Different Project Duration Forecasting Methods using Earned Value Metrics,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 289-302, 2006.   DOI
16 Steven Nahmias and Tava Lennon Olsen, "Production and Operations Analysis : 7th edition," Waveland Press Inc. USA, pp. 62-66, 2015.