Browse > Article

Performance Analysis of Follower Noise Jamming Considering Tracking Parameters against Frequency Hopping Signals  

Lee, Chi-Ho (ADD)
Jo, Sung-Jin (ADD)
Ryu, Jeong-Ho (ADD)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology / v.11, no.3, 2008 , pp. 67-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the performance of Follower Noise Jamming(FNJ) considering three practical tracking parameters such as tracking bandwidth, tracking time and tracking success probability. The performance of FNJ is compared with that of Partial-Band Noise Jamming(PBNJ) in terms of Symbol Error Rate(SER) at the communication receiver under the assumed typical operation model. It is observed that the performance of FNJ is non-linearly dependent on the tracking bandwidth, the tracking time and the tracking success probability. As we can easily expect, it is also observed that the performance of FNJ is better than that of the PBNJ. Finally, it is shown that, for a fixed tracking bandwidth, the combinations of the required tracking time and the tracking success probability which satisfy a certain required SER.
Keywords
Follower Noise Jamming; Partial-Band Noise Jamming; Tracking Bandwidth; Tracking Time; Tracking Success Probability; Average Symbol Error Rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R. Dillard, Detectability of Spread Spectrum Signals, Artech House, 1989
2 M. Simon, J. Omura, R. Scholtz and B. Levitt, Spread Spectrum Communications Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 1994
3 K. Burda, 'The Performance of the Follower Jammer with a Wideband-Scanning Receiver', J. Electronical Eng., Vol. 55, No. 1-2, pp. 36-38, Jan. 2004
4 이치호, 조성진, 류영진, 이광일, '주파수 도약신호에 대한 도약대역 탐지율 분석', 한국군사과학기술학회 종합학술대회, pp. 118-121, 2006년 8월
5 R. Poisel, Modern Communications Jamming Principles and Techniques, Artech House, 2004
6 B. Sklar, Digital Communications : Fundamentals and Applications, Prentice-Hall, 1988
7 Q. Wang, 'Performance of Fast Frequency Hopped Noncoherent MFSK with a Fixed Hop Rate Under Worst Case Jamming', IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 38, No. 10, pp. 1786-1798, Oct. 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
8 R. Scholtz, 'The Spread Spectrum Concept', IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 748-755, Aug. 1977   DOI
9 E. Felsted, 'Follower Jammer Considerations for Frequency Hopped Spread Spectrum', IEEE MILCOM'98, Vol. 2, pp. 474-478, 1996
10 D. Torriori, 'Fundamental Limitations on Repeater Jamming of Frequency-Hopping Communicaions', J. Select. Areas Commun., Vol. 7, No. 4, May 1989