Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2022.60.4.295

Comparative Assessment of Diagnostic Performance of Cytochrome Oxidase Multiplex PCR and 18S rRNA Nested PCR  

Kumari, Preeti (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Sinha, Swati (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Gahtori, Renuka (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Quadiri, Afshana (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Mahale, Paras (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Savargaonkar, Deepali (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Pande, Veena (Kumaun University)
Srivastava, Bina (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Singh, Himmat (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Anvikar, Anupkumar R (ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research)
Publication Information
Parasites, Hosts and Diseases / v.60, no.4, 2022 , pp. 295-299 More about this Journal
Abstract
Malaria elimination and control require prompt and accurate diagnosis for treatment plan. Since microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) are not sensitive particularly for diagnosing low parasitemia, highly sensitive diagnostic tools are required for accurate treatment. Molecular diagnosis of malaria is commonly carried out by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting 18S rRNA gene, while this technique involves long turnaround time and multiple steps leading to false positive results. To overcome these drawbacks, we compared highly sensitive cytochrome oxidase gene-based single-step multiplex reaction with 18S rRNA nested PCR. Cytochrome oxidase (cox) genes of P. falciparum (cox-III) and P. vivax (cox-I) were compared with 18S rRNA gene nested PCR and microscopy. Cox gene multiplex PCR was found to be highly specific and sensitive, enhancing the detection limit of mixed infections. Cox gene multiplex PCR showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97%. This approach can be used as an alternative diagnostic method as it offers higher diagnostic performance and is amenable to high throughput scaling up for a larger sample size at low cost.
Keywords
Cytochrome b; malaria; multiplex PCR; high-throughput; diagnostic;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ocker R, Prompunjai Y, Chutipongvivate S, Karanis P. Malaria diagnosis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in Thailand. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2016; 58: 27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201658027   DOI
2 Yatsushiro S, Yamamura S, Yamaguchi Y, Shinohara Y, Tamiya E, Horii T, Baba Y, Kataoka M. Rapid and highly sensitive detection of malaria-infected erythrocytes using a cell microarray chip. PLoS One 2010, 5: e13179. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013179   DOI
3 Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Jarra W, Thaithong S, Brown KN. Identification of the four human malaria parasite species in field samples by the polymerase chain reaction and detection of a high prevalence of mixed infections. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1993; 58: 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90050-8   DOI
4 Kumar N, Pande V, Bhatt R, Shah NK, Mishra N, Srivastava B, Valecha N, Anvikar AR. Genetic deletion of HRP2 and HRP3 in Indian Plasmodium falciparum population and false negative malaria rapid diagnostic test. Acta Trop 2013; 125: 119-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.09.015   DOI
5 World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2020: 20 Years of Global Progress and Challenges. Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337660
6 Kumari P, Sinha S, Gahtori R, Yadav CP, Pradhan MM, Rahi M, Pande V, Anvikar AR. Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitemia in Odisha, India: a challenge to malaria elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:1510-1516. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0018   DOI
7 Imwong M, Pukrittayakamee S, Gruner AC, Renia L, Letourneur F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Snounou G. Practical PCR genotyping protocols for Plasmodium vivax using Pvcs and Pvmsp1. Malaria J 2005; 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-4-20   DOI
8 Hanscheid T, Grobusch MP. How useful is PCR in the diagnosis of malaria? Trends Parasitol 2002; 18: 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02348-6   DOI
9 Haanshuus CG, Mohn SC, Morch K, Langeland N, Blomberg B, Hanevik K. A novel, single-amplification PCR targeting mitochondrial genome highly sensitive and specific in diagnosing malaria among returned travellers in Bergen, Norway. Malaria J 2013; 12: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-26   DOI
10 Preiser PR, Wilson RJ, Moore PW, McCready S, Hajibagheri MA, Blight KJ, Strath M, Williamson DH. Recombination associated with replication of malarial mitochondrial DNA. EMBO J 1996; 15: 684-693.   DOI
11 Putaporntip C, Buppan P, Jongwutiwes S. Improved performance with saliva and urine as alternative DNA sources for malaria diagnosis by mitochondrial DNA-based PCR assays. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17: 1484-1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03507.x   DOI
12 Kumar N, Singh JP, Pande V, Mishra N, Srivastava B, Kapoor R, Valecha N, Anvikar AR. Genetic variation in histidine rich proteins among Indian Plasmodium falciparum population: possible cause of variable sensitivity of malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Malaria J 2012; 11: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-298   DOI
13 Polley SD, Mori Y, Watson J, Perkins MD, Gonzalez IJ, Notomi T, Chiodini PL, Sutherland CJ. Mitochondrial DNA targets increase sensitivity of malaria detection using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48: 2866-2871. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00355-10   DOI
14 Ochola LB, Vounatsou P, Smith T, Mabaso ML, Newton CR. The reliability of diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis and management of malaria in the absence of a gold standard. Lancet Infect Dis 2006; 6: 582-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70579-5   DOI
15 Tangpukdee N, Duangdee C, Wilairatana P, Krudsood S. Malaria diagnosis: a brief review. Korean J Parasitol 2009; 47: 93-102. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2009.47.2.93   DOI
16 Das A, Anvikar AR, Cator LJ, Dhiman RC, Eapen A, Mishra N, Nagpal BN, Nanda N, Raghavendra K, Read AF, Sharma SK, Singh OP, Singh V, Sinnis P, Srivastava HC, Sullivan SA, Sutton PL, Thomas MB, Carlton JM, Valecha N. Malaria in India: the center for the study of complex malaria in India. Acta Trop 2012; 121: 267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.11.008   DOI
17 Mangold KA, Manson RU, Koay ES, Stephens L, Regner M, Thomson RB, Peterson LR, Kaul KL. Real-time PCR for detection and identification of Plasmodium spp. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 2435-2440. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.5.2435-2440.2005   DOI
18 Cunha MG, Medina TS, Oliveira SG, Marinho AN, Povoa MM, Ribeiro-dos-Santos AK. Development of a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method based on amplification of mitochondrial DNA to detect Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Acta Trop 2009; 111: 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.02.003   DOI
19 Mohammed H, Kassa M, Mekete K, Assefa A, Taye G, Commons RJ. Genetic diversity of the msp-1, msp-2, and glurp genes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates in Northwest Ethiopia. Malaria J 2018; 17: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2540-x   DOI
20 Hanscheid T, Valadas E. Poor accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests and misdiagnosis of imported malaria: are PCR-based reference laboratories the answer? J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 736-737. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.2.736-737.2002   DOI