Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2016.54.3.363

Mass Death of Predatory Carp, Chanodichthys erythropterus, Induced by Plerocercoid Larvae of Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae)  

Sohn, Woon-Mok (Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine)
Na, Byoung-Kuk (Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine)
Jung, Soo Gun (Korea Federation for Environmental Movements in Daegu)
Kim, Koo Hwan (Nakdong River Integrated Operations Center, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
Publication Information
Parasites, Hosts and Diseases / v.54, no.3, 2016 , pp. 363-368 More about this Journal
Abstract
We describe here the mass death of predatory carp, Chanodichthys erythropterus, in Korea induced by plerocercoid larvae of Ligula intestinalis as a result of host manipulation. The carcasses of fish with ligulid larvae were first found in the river-edge areas of Chilgok-bo in Nakdong-gang (River), Korea at early February 2016. This ecological phenomena also occurred in the adjacent areas of 3 dams of Nakdong-gang, i.e., Gangjeong-bo, Dalseong-bo, and Hapcheon-Changnyeong-bo. Total 1,173 fish carcasses were collected from the 4 regions. To examine the cause of death, we captured 10 wondering carp in the river-edge areas of Hapcheon-Changnyeong-bo with a landing net. They were 24.0-28.5 cm in length and 147-257 g in weight, and had 2-11 plerocercoid larvae in the abdominal cavity. Their digestive organs were slender and empty, and reproductive organs were not observed at all. The plerocercoid larvae occupied almost all spaces of the abdominal cavity under the air bladders. The proportion of larvae per fish was 14.6-32.1% of body weight. The larvae were ivory-white, 21.5-63.0 cm long, and 6.0-13.8 g in weight. We suggest that the preference for the river-edge in infected fish during winter is a modified behavioral response by host manipulation of the tapeworm larvae. The life cycle of this tapeworm seems to be successfully continued as the infected fish can be easily eaten by avian definitive hosts.
Keywords
Ligula intestinalis; plerocercoid; host manipulation; predatory carp; Chanodichthys erythropterus;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dubinina MN. Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the Fauna of the USSR. New Delhi, India. Amerind Publishing Co. 1980.
2 Loot G, Francisco P, Santoul FG, Lek S, Guegan JF. The three hosts of the Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda) life cycle in Lavernose-Lacasse gravel pit, France. Arch Hydrobil 2001; 152: 511-525.   DOI
3 Beaver PC, Jung RC, Cupp EW. Clinical Parasitology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, USA. Lea & Febiger. 1984, p 499.
4 Tizie E, Baye D, Mohamed A. Prevalence of Ligula intestinalis larvae in Barbus fish genera at Lake Tana, Ethiopia. World J Fish Marine Sci 2014; 6: 408-416.
5 Britton JR, Jackson MC, Harper DM. Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) in Kenya: a field investigation into host specificity and behavioural alterations. Parasitology 2009; 136: 1367-1373.   DOI
6 Kurupinar E, Ozturk MO. A study on the helminth fauna linked to seasonal changes and size of the fish host, Leuciscus cephalus L., from Lake Dam Orenler, Afyonkarahisar. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2009; 33: 248-253 (in Turkish).
7 Rusuwa B, Ngochera M, Maruyama A. Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) infection of Engraulicypris sardella (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in Lake Malawi. Malawi J Sci Tech 2014; 10: 8-14.
8 Arslan MO, Yilmaz M, Tasci GT. Infections of Ligula intestinalis on freshwater fish in Kars plateau of north-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2015; 39: 218-221.   DOI
9 Ryu SS, Lee HJ. Study on the Ligula intestinalis larvae parasitized in freshwater fish. The 38th Korea Science Exihibition, Biological (Animal) Section, 1992, pp 1-14 (in Korean).
10 Geraudie P, Boulange-Lecomte C, Gerbron M, Hinfray N, Brion F, Minier C. Endocrine effects of the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis in its teleost host, the roach (Rutilus rutilus). Parasitology 2010; 137: 697-704.   DOI
11 Hadou-Sanoun G, Arab A, Lek-Ang S, Lek S. Impact of Ligula intestinalis (L. 1758) (Cestode), on the growth of Barbus setivimensis (Cyprinidae) in a lake system in Algeria. C R Biol 2012; 335: 300-309 (in French).   DOI
12 Trubiroha A, Wuertz S, Frank SN, Sures B, Kloas W. Expression of gonadotropin subunits in roach (Rutilus rutilus, Cyprinidae) infected with plerocercoids of the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda). Int J Parasitol 2009; 39: 1465-1473.   DOI
13 Innal D, Keskin N, Erk'akan F. Distribution of Ligula intestinalis (L.) in Turkey. Turkish J Fish Aqua Sci 2007; 7: 19-22.
14 Trubiroha A, Kroupova H, Wuertz S, Frank SN, Sures B, Kloas W. Naturally-induced endocrine disruption by the parasite Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda) in roach (Rutilus rutilus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 2010; 166: 234-240.   DOI
15 Trubiroha A, Kroupova H, Frank SN, Sures B, Kloas W. Inhibition of gametogenesis by the cestode Ligula intestinalis in roach (Rutilus rutilus) is attenuated under laboratory conditions. Parasitology 2011; 138: 648-659.   DOI
16 Boulange-Lecomte C, Geraudie P, Forget-Leray J, Gerbron M, Minier C. Ligula intestinalis infection is associated with alterations of both brain and gonad aromatase expression in roach (Rutilus rutilus). J Helminthol 2011; 85: 339-344.   DOI
17 Kroupova H, Trubiroha A, Wuertz S, Frank SN, Sures B, Kloas W. Nutritional status and gene expression along the somatotropic axis in roach (Rutilus rutilus) infected with the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2012; 177: 270-277.   DOI
18 Barber I, Hoare D, Krause J. Effects of parasites on fish behaviour: a review and evolutionary perspective. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2000; 10: 131-165.   DOI
19 Loot G, Lek S, Dejean D, Guegan JF. Parasite-induced mortality in three host populations of the roach Rutilus rutilus (L.) by the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis (L.). Ann Limnol 2001; 37: 151-159.   DOI
20 Loot G, Poulin R, Lek S, Guegan JF. The differential effects of Ligula intestinalis (L.) plerocercoids on host growth in three natural populations of roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.). Ecol Freshw Fish 2002; 11: 168-177.   DOI
21 Brown SP, Loot G, Grenfell BT, Guegan JF. Host manipulation by Ligula intestinalis: accident or adaptation? Parasitology 2001; 123: 519-529.
22 Vyas A, Kim SK, Giacomini N, Boothroyd JC, Sapolsky RM. Behavioural changes induced by Toxoplasma infection of rodents are highly specific to aversion of cat odors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 6442-6447.   DOI
23 Brown SP, Loot G, Teriokhin A, Brunel A, Brunel C, Guegan JF. Host manipulation by Ligula intestinalis: a cause or consequence of parasite aggregation? Int J Parasitol 2002; 32: 817-824.   DOI
24 Loot G, Aulagnier S, Lek S, Thomas F, Guegan JF. Experimental demonstration of a behavioural modification in a cyprinid fish, Rutilus rutilus (L.), induced by a parasite, Ligula intestinalis (L.). Can J Zool 2002; 80: 738-744.   DOI
25 Chai JY, Hong ST, Choi MH, Shin EH, Bae YM, Hong SJ, Sohn WM, Yu JR, Kho WG, Seo M, Park YK, Han ET. Seo and Lee's Clinical Parasitology. Seoul, Korea. Seoul National University Press, 2011, pp 37-39 (in Korean).
26 Loot G, Park YS, Lek S, Brosse S. Encounter rate between local populations shapes host selection in complex parasite life cycle. Biol J Linn Soc 2006; 89: 99-106.   DOI
27 Hayatbakhsh MR, Khara H, Movahed R, Sayadborani M, Rohi JD, Ahmadnezhad M, Rahbar M, Rad AS. Haematological characteristics associated with parasitism in bream, Abramis brama orientalis. J Parasit Dis 2014; 38: 383-388.   DOI
28 Halimi M, Colagar AH, Youssefi MR. Immune response in spirlins (Alburnoides bipunctatus, Bloch 1782) infested by Ligula intestinalis parasite. Vet Italiana 2013; 49: 243-246.
29 Carter V, Pierce R, Dufour S, Arme C, Hoole D. The tapeworm Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) inhibits LH expression and puberty in its teleost host, Rutilus rutilus. Reproduction 2005; 130: 939-945.   DOI
30 Joyeux CE, Noyer R. Presence d'une larva de ligule dans des vomissements Marseille Med 1931; 68: 235-236.