Somvasoontra, Suttikiat
(Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University)
Tharanon, Wichit (Dental Innovation Foundation under Royal Patronage) Serichetaphongse, Pravej (Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University) Pimkhaokham, Atiphan (Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University) |
1 | Misch CE. Maxillary arch implant considerations: fixes and overdenture prosthesis. In: Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 367-88. |
2 | Al Shammout RW, Al Jabrah O, Aburumman K, Alhabahbah AM, Almanaseer W. The effect of various classes of malocclusions on the maxillary arch forms and dimensions in Jordanian population. Adv Dent Oral Health 2016; 2: 17-23. |
3 | Alam MK, Shahid F, Purmal K, Ahmad B, Khamis MF. Bolton tooth size ratio and its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 1047-53. DOI |
4 | Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 1-6. DOI |
5 | El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 259-65. DOI |
6 | Palacci P, Nowzari H. Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47: 113-32. DOI |
7 | Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 119-28. DOI |
8 | Lopez-Jarana P, Diaz-Castro CM, Falcao A, Falcao C, Rios-Santos J, Herrero-Climent M. Thickness of the buccal bone wall and root angulation in the maxilla and mandible: an approach to cone beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 194. DOI |
9 | Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, Lv P, Cao YM, Yu M, et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2015; 45: 245-52. DOI |
10 | Chung SH, Park YS, Chung SH, Shon WJ. Determination of implant position for immediate implant placement in maxillary central incisors using palatal soft tissue landmarks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 627-33. DOI |
11 | Benjasupattananan S, Sirikururat P. Relationship between facial alveolar bone thickness and root position of maxillary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography. J Dent Assoc Thai 2018; 68: 38-47. |
12 | Petaibunlue S, Serichetaphongse P, Pimkhaokham A. Influence of the anterior arch shape and root position on root angulation in the maxillary esthetic area. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 123-30. DOI |
13 | Do TA, Shen YW, Fuh LJ, Huang HL. Clinical assessment of the palatal alveolar bone thickness and its correlation with the buccolingual angulation of maxillary incisors for immediate implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 1080-6. DOI |
14 | Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 Suppl: 43-61. |
15 | Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 Suppl: 216-20. |
16 | Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Patel RD, Waki T, Lozada JL, et al. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 873-6. |
17 | Schimmel M, Muller F, Suter V, Buser D. Implants for elderly patients. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 228-40. DOI |
18 | Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 569-77. |
19 | Lombardo L, Coppola P, Siciliani G. Comparison of dental and alveolar arch forms between different ethnic groups. Int Orthod 2015; 13: 462-88. |
20 | Linjawi A. Predictive factors affecting the maxillary alveolar bone thickness: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2020; 12: 359-65. DOI |
21 | Shafique A, Saleem T, Chattha MR. Arch form analyses: a comparison of two different methods. Pak Oral Dent J 2011; 31: 347-51. |
22 | Testori T, Weinstein T, Scutella F, Wang HL, Zucchelli G. Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants. Periodontol 2000 2018; 77: 176-96. DOI |
23 | Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D boneto-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 113-9. |
24 | Soumya P, Chappidi V, Koppolu P, Pathakota K. Evaluation of facial and palatal alveolar bone thickness and sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth on cone beam computerized tomograms. Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24: 329-34. DOI |
25 | Mukhia N, Birur NP, Shubhasini AR, Shubha G, Keerthi G. Dimensional measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional models from cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021; 132: 361-9. DOI |
26 | Ansari T, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. The relationship of various arch forms and cortical bone thickness. J Dent (Tehran) 2011; 8: 7-11. |
27 | Al-Zubair NM. Determinant factors of Yemeni maxillary arch dimensions. Saudi Dent J 2015; 27: 50-4. DOI |
28 | Tajik I, Mushtaq N, Khan M. Arch forms among different angle classifications - a study. Pak Oral Dent J 2011; 31: 92-5. |
29 | Khoury J, Ghosn N, Mokbel N, Naaman N. Buccal bone thickness overlying maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical and radiographic prospective human study. Implant Dent 2016; 25: 525-31. DOI |
30 | Xu D, Wang Z, Sun L, Lin Z, Wan L, Li Y, et al. Classification of the root position of the maxillary central incisors and its clinical significance in immediate implant placement. Implant Dent 2016; 25: 520-4. DOI |
31 | Kim JH, Lee JG, Han DH, Kim HJ. Morphometric analysis of the anterior region of the maxillary bone for immediate implant placement using micro-CT. Clin Anat 2011; 24: 462-8. DOI |
32 | Gomez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gomez-Polo C, Martin C, Celemin A, Del Rio J. Does length, diameter, or bone quality affect primary and secondary stability in self-tapping dental implants? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 1344-53. DOI |
33 | Bulyalert A, Pimkhaokham A. A novel classification of anterior alveolar arch forms and alveolar bone thickness: a conebeam computed tomography study. Imaging Sci Dent 2018; 48: 191-9. DOI |
34 | United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population ageing 2019 (ST/ESA/ SER.A/444) [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 28]. Available from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf. |
35 | Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 1123-9. DOI |
36 | Bidez MW, Misch CE. Clinical biomechanics in implant dentistry. In: Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 95-106. |
37 | Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19-28. DOI |
38 | Gakonyo J, Mohamedali AJ, Mungure EK. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the buccal bone thickness in anterior maxillary teeth: relevance to immediate implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33: 880-7. DOI |
39 | Zhang CY, DeBaz C, Bhandal G, Alli F, Buencamino Francisco MC, Thacker HL, et al. Buccal bone thickness in the esthetic zone of postmenopausal women: a CBCT analysis. Implant Dent 2016; 25: 478-84. DOI |
40 | Zarei M, Jahangirnezhad M, Yousefimanesh H, Robati M, Robati H. A comparative study on the stress distribution around dental implants in three arch form models for replacing six implants using finite element analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2018; 22: 127-32. DOI |
![]() |