Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20210104

Magnetic resonance imaging study of incidental findings in the paranasal sinuses and ostiomeatal complex  

Yousefi, Faezeh (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Mollabashi, Mina (Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Shokri, Abbas (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Tavakoli, Emad (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Farhadian, Maryam (Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Tavakoli, Ali (Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.52, no.1, 2022 , pp. 11-18 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess incidental abnormal findings in the paranasal sinuses and anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Materials and Methods: MRI scans of 616 patients (mean age, 44.0±19.4 years) were evaluated. Prior to obtaining the MRI scans, a checklist of patients' clinical symptoms was filled out after obtaining their consent. The Lund-Mackay classification was used to assess the paranasal sinuses and OMC. The prevalence of abnormal findings and their associations with patients' age, sex, and subjective symptoms were analyzed by the chi-square test, independent-sample t-test, and analysis of variance. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: Abnormal findings in the paranasal sinuses were detected in 32.0% of patients, with a significantly higher prevalence in males (P<0.05), but no significant association with age (P>0.05). Epithelial thickening and retention cyst were the most common abnormal findings in the paranasal sinuses. According to the Lund-Mackay classification, 93% of the study population had normal sinuses (score<4). Concha bullosa and paradoxical concha were detected in 15.3% and 3.4%, respectively, with no significant association with the presence of septal deviation or Lund-Mackay classification (P>0.05). Conclusion: Considering the relatively high prevalence of abnormal findings in the paranasal sinuses, it appears that clinical symptoms alone are not sufficient to diagnose sinusitis. A more accurate strategy would be to assess radiographic images of the paranasal sinuses and use a classification system. Sinusitis should be suspected in patients receiving a high score in this classification.
Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Paranasal Sinuses; Incidental Findings; Nasal Septum;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kilickesmez O, Onerci Celebi O, Yalcinkaya M, Gokduman AR, Karagoz Y, Yigit O. Correlation of quantitative MR imaging findings with symptoms in patients with incidentally detected inflammatory sinonasal disease. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 99: 65-72.   DOI
2 Dankbaar JW, van Bemmel AJ, Pameijer FA. Imaging findings of the orbital and intracranial complications of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Insights Imaging 2015; 6: 509-18.
3 Rao JJ, Kumar EC, Babu KR, Chowdary VS, Singh J, Rangamani SV. Classification of nasal septal deviations - relation to sinonasal pathology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 57: 199-201.   DOI
4 Sugiura S, Yasue M, Uchida Y, Teranishi M, Sone M, Suzuki H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of MRI abnormality which was suspected as sinusitis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly community dwellers. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 4096845.   DOI
5 Fanucci E, Fiaschetti V, Fusco N, Viarani S, Gargari M, Barlattani A, et al. Role of diagnostic imaging to malignant sinus tumors in presurgical staging. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2008; 1: 56-65.
6 Pulickal GG, Navaratnam AV, Nguyen T, Dragan AD, Dziedzic M, Lingam RK. Imaging sinonasal disease with MRI: providing insight over and above CT. Eur J Radiol 2018; 102: 157-68.   DOI
7 McIntosh D, Mahadevan M. Failure of contrast enhanced computed tomography scans to identify an orbital abscess. The benefit of magnetic resonance imaging. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122: 639-40.   DOI
8 Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J, European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps group. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. Rhinol Suppl 2007; 20: 1-136.
9 Ozdemir M, Kavak RP. Season, age and sex-related differences in incidental magnetic resonance imaging findings of paranasal sinuses in adults. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 57: 61-7.   DOI
10 Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, Lund V, Brown P. The Lund- Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137: 555-61.   DOI
11 Nazri M, Bux SI, Tengku-Kamalden TF, Ng KH, Sun Z. Incidental detection of sinus mucosal abnormalities on CT and MRI imaging of the head. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2013; 3: 82-8.   DOI
12 Oyinloye OI, Akande JH, Alabi BS, Afolabi OA. Incidental paranasal sinus abnormality on cranial computed tomography in a Nigerian population. Ann Afr Med 2013; 12: 62-4.   DOI
13 Rege IC, Sousa TO, Leles CR, Mendonca EF. Occurrence of maxillary sinus abnormalities detected by cone beam CT in asymptomatic patients. BMC Oral Health 2012; 12: 30.   DOI
14 Eggesbo HB, Ringertz S, Haanaes OC, Dolvik S, Erichsen A, Stiris M, et al. CT and MR imaging of the paranasal sinuses in cystic fibrosis. Correlation with microbiological and histopathological results. Acta Radiol 1999; 40: 154-62.   DOI
15 del Rio A, Trost N, Tartaglia C, O'Leary SJ, Michael P. Seasonality and incidental sinus abnormality reporting on MRI in an Australian climate. Rhinology 2012; 50: 319-24.   DOI
16 von Kalle T, Fabig-Moritz C, Heumann H, Winkler P. Incidental findings in paranasal sinuses and mastoid cells: a crosssectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study in a pediatric radiology department. Rofo 2012; 184: 629-34.   DOI
17 Kucybala I, Janik KA, Ciuk S, Storman D, Urbanik A. Nasal septal deviation and concha bullosa - do they have an impact on maxillary sinus volumes and prevalence of maxillary sinusitis? Pol J Radiol 2017; 82: 126-33.   DOI
18 Abraham J. Imaging for head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2015; 24: 455-71.   DOI
19 Munhoz L, Abdala Junior R, Arita ES. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans in the differentiation of maxillary sinus inflammatory diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2019; 127: 433-43.   DOI
20 Xiao Z, Tang Z, Qiang J, Wang S, Qian W, Zhong Y, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant sinonasal lesions: comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39: 538-46.   DOI
21 Younis RT, Anand VK, Davidson B. The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sinusitis with complications. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 224-9.   DOI
22 Betts AM, Cornelius R. Magnetic resonance imaging in sinonasal disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 24: 15-22.   DOI
23 Hansen AG, Helvik AS, Nordgard S, Bugten V, Stovner LJ, Haberg AK, et al. Incidental findings in MRI of the paranasal sinuses in adults: a population-based study (HUNT MRI). BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2014; 14: 13.   DOI
24 Lund VJ, Kennedy DW. Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: S35-40.   DOI