1 |
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 36-42.
DOI
|
2 |
Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1201-8.
DOI
|
3 |
Guth JF, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 1487-94.
DOI
|
4 |
Dentalaxess.com [Internet]. 3Shape Trios 3 Intraoral Scanner. Zurich: Dental Axess AG [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://dentalaxess.com/product/3shape-trios/.
|
5 |
Aragon ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 429-34.
DOI
|
6 |
Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137 Suppl: 5S-6S.
DOI
|
7 |
Skramstad MJ. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 69-78.
|
8 |
Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 92.
DOI
|
9 |
Su TS, Sun J. Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in-vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2015; 59: 236-42.
DOI
|
10 |
Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Di Mauro MI, Spagnuolo G, Ferrari M, Sorrentino R. Accuracy of three impression materials on the totally edentulous maxilla: in vitro/in silico comparative analysis. Materials(Basel) 2020; 13: 515.
DOI
|
11 |
Trifkovic B, Budak I, Todorovic A, Vukelic D, Lazic V, Puskar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement 2014; 47: 45-53.
DOI
|
12 |
Osnes CA, Wu JH, Venezia P, Ferrari M, Keeling AJ. Full arch precision of six intraoral scanners in vitro. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64: 6-11.
DOI
|
13 |
Steinhauser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, et al. Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 2011; 72: 111-24.
DOI
|
14 |
Latham J, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Renne W. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123: 85-95.
DOI
|
15 |
Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1461-71.
DOI
|
16 |
Sim JY, Jang Y, Kim WC, Kim HY, Lee DH, Kim JH. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional work-flows. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63: 25-30.
DOI
|
17 |
Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 158-60.
|
18 |
Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1687-94.
DOI
|
19 |
Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005; 8: 283-94.
|
20 |
Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 554-9.
DOI
|
21 |
Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 555-60.
DOI
|
22 |
Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 283-9.
DOI
|
23 |
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-91.
DOI
|
24 |
International Organization of Standardization. ISO 12836:2018. Dentistry - digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - test methods for assessing accuracy. Geneva: ISO; 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/68414.html.
|
25 |
Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 9-17.
|
26 |
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 149.
DOI
|
27 |
Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 343-9.
|
28 |
Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness, and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14: 10.
DOI
|
29 |
Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 225-32.
DOI
|
30 |
Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 403-6.
DOI
|
31 |
Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145: 542-51.
DOI
|
32 |
Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-9.
|
33 |
Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel twostep putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 274-81.
DOI
|
34 |
Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 673-82.
DOI
|
35 |
Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Sigusch BW, Thompson GA, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2013; 41: 271-7.
DOI
|
36 |
Park HN, Lim YJ, Yi WJ, Han JS, Lee SP. A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator. J Adv Prosthodont 2018; 10: 58-64.
DOI
|
37 |
Uhm SH, Kim JH, Jiang HB, Woo CW, Chang M, Kim KN, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard. Dent Mater J 2017; 36: 27-34.
DOI
|
38 |
Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Graiff L, Savio G, Vigolo P, Monaco C, et al. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63: 396-403.
DOI
|
39 |
Alzahrani SJ, El-Hammali H, Morgano SM, Elkassaby H. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: a 3D analysis study. J Prosthet Dent(in press).
|
40 |
ISO 5725-1:1994 (en). Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva: ISO; 1994 [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5725:-1:en.
|
41 |
Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Tsagarakis A, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: a single-blinded in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124: 581-8.
DOI
|
42 |
Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 755-9.
DOI
|
43 |
Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 101.
DOI
|
44 |
Diker B, Tak O. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. J Adv Prosthodont 2020; 12: 299-306.
DOI
|
45 |
Bilmenoglu C, Cilingir A, Geckili O, Bilhan H, Bilgin T. In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124: 755-60.
DOI
|
46 |
Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018; 26: 101-21.
|
47 |
Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37: 579-87.
DOI
|
48 |
Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 11-28.
|
49 |
Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsky E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0163107.
DOI
|
50 |
Abad-Coronel C, Valdiviezo OP, Naranjo OB. Intraoral scanning devices applied in fixed prosthodontics. Acta Sci Dent Sci 2019; 3: 44-51.
|
51 |
Mennito AS, Evans ZP, Lauer AW, Patel RB, Ludlow ME, Renne WG. Evaluation of the effect scan pattern has on the trueness and precision of six intraoral digital impression systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 113-8.
DOI
|