Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.3.209

Discriminatory ability of cervical vertebral maturation stages in predicting attainment of the legal age threshold of 14 years: A pilot study using lateral cephalograms  

Banda, Thirupathi Reddy (Department of Prosthodontics, Penang International Dental College)
Komuravelli, Anil Kumar (Department of Prosthodontics, Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College)
Balla, Sudheer B. (Department of Forensic Odontology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences)
Korrai, Bala Raju (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Anil Neerukonda Institute of Dental Sciences)
Alluri, Kavya (Department of Oral Medicine, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences)
Kondapaneni, Jayasurya (Department of Oral Medicine, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences)
Abhyankar, Sourab (Department of Oral Medicine, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.50, no.3, 2020 , pp. 209-216 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In India, the age of 14 years is the legal age threshold for child labour. Therefore, in suspected instances of child labour, age assessment plays a crucial role in determining whether a violation of the law on the employment of children has occurred. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the discriminatory ability of stages of cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) in predicting the legal age threshold of 14 years. Materials and Methods: Routinely taken lateral cephalograms from 408 subjects aged 10 to 18 years were evaluated retrospectively using the CVM stages described by Baccetti et al. Descriptive statistics, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated for stages 2, 3, and 4 of CVM. Results: Real age increased as the CVM stage gradually increased. The results of 2×2 contingency tables showed that CVM stage 4 produced an accuracy of 71% and 73%, a false positive rate of 7% and 18%, and a post-test probability of 59% and 68% for boys and girls, respectively. Conclusion: Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the stages of CVM are of limited use for predicting the attainment of the legal age threshold of 14 years. Future studies should investigate whether combinations of skeletal and dental methods could achieve better accuracy and post-test probability.
Keywords
Cervical Vertebrae; Growth and Development; Age Determination by Skeleton; Child; India;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jayaraman J, Roberts GJ, Wong HM, McDonald F, King NM. Ages of legal importance: implications in relation to birth registration and age assessment practices. Med Sci Law 2016; 56: 77-82.   DOI
2 Cappa C. Every child's birth right: inequities and trends in birth registration [Internet]. New York: UNICEF; 2013 [cited 2020 August 21]. Available from: https://www.cmsny.org/wp-content/uploads/Cappa.pdf.
3 Kabishna [Internet]. Legal services India; c2000-2020 [cited 2020 Mar 14]. Child Labour in India. Available from: http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-92-child-labour-inindia.html.
4 Liversidge HM, Chaillet N, Mornstad H, Nystrom M, Rowlings K, Taylor J, et al. Timing of Demirjian's tooth formation stages. Ann Hum Biol 2006; 33: 454-70.   DOI
5 McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 91-110.   DOI
6 Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1959.
7 Soegiharto BM, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with receiver operating characteristics analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 227-37.   DOI
8 Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973; 45: 211-27.
9 Alhadlaq AM, Al-Maflehi NS. New model for cervical vertebral bone age estimation in boys. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci 2013; 4: 1-5.   DOI
10 Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1975; 67: 458-9 (Abstract).   DOI
11 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 316-23.
12 de Cassia Silva Azevedo A, Michel-Crosato E, Haye Biazevic MG. Radiographic evaluation of dental and cervical vertebral development for age estimation in a young Brazilian population. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2018; 36: 31-9.
13 Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 58-66.   DOI
14 Grave K, Townsend G. Cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt. Aust Orthod J 2003; 19: 25-32.
15 Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 335-40.   DOI
16 Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005; 11: 119-29.   DOI
17 Gelbrich B, Fischer M, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Gelbrich G. Are cervical vertebrae suitable for age estimation? J Forensic Odontostomatol 2017; 35: 66-78.
18 Cameriere R, Giuliodori A, Zampi M, Galic I, Cingolani M, Pagliara F, et al. Age estimation in children and young adolescents for forensic purposes using fourth cervical vertebra (C4). Int J Leg Med 2015; 129: 347-55.   DOI
19 Altan M, Nebioglu Dalci O, Iseri H. Growth of the cervical vertebrae in girls from 8 to 17 years. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 327-34.   DOI
20 Medina LS, Blackmore CC, Applegate KE. Evidence-based imaging: improving the quality of imaging in patient care. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2011. p. 3-17.
21 Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016; 113: 44-50.
22 Garamendi PM, Landa MI, Ballesteros J, Solano MA. Reliability of the methods applied to assess age minority in living subjects around 18 years old. A survey on a Moroccan origin population. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 154: 3-12.   DOI
23 Wong RW, Alkhal HA, Rabie AB. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 484.e1-6.   DOI
24 Al Khal HA, Wong RW, Rabie AB. Elimination of hand-wrist radiographs for maturity assessment in children needing orthodontic therapy. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 195-200.   DOI
25 Turkoz C, Kaygisiz E, Ulusoy C, Ates C. A practical formula for determining growth. Diagn Interv Radiol 2017; 23: 194-8.   DOI
26 Montasser MA, Viana G, Evans CA. Secular trends in the timing of skeletal maturation as assessed by the cervical vertebrae maturation method. Eur J Orthod 2017; 39: 188-93.
27 Cameriere R, Ferrante L. Age estimation in children by measurement of carpals and epiphyses of radius and ulna and open apices in teeth: a pilot study. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 174: 60-3.   DOI
28 Pinchi V, De Luca F, Focardi M, Pradella F, Vitale G, Ricciardi F, et al. Combining dental and skeletal evidence in age classification: pilot study in a sample of Italian sub-adults. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2016; 20: 75-9.   DOI