Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.1.51

Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography  

Suteerapongpun, Piyoros (Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Wattanachai, Tanapan (Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Janhom, Apirum (Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Tripuwabhrut, Polbhat (Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Jotikasthira, Dhirawat (Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.48, no.1, 2018 , pp. 51-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a comparative analysis of the palatal bone thickness in Thai patients exhibiting class I malocclusion according to whether they exhibited a normal or open vertical skeletal configuration using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Thirty CBCT images of Thai orthodontic patients (15-30 years of age) exhibiting class I malocclusion with a normal or open vertical skeletal configuration were selected. Palatal bone thickness was measured in a 3.0-mm grid pattern on both the right and left sides. The palatal bone thickness of the normal-bite and open-bite groups was compared using the independent t-test. The level of significance was established at P<.05. Results: The palatal bone thickness in the normal-bite group ranged from $2.2{\pm}1.0mm$ to $12.6{\pm}4.1mm$. The palatal bone thickness in the open-bite group ranged from $1.9{\pm}1.1mm$ to $13.2{\pm}2.3mm$. The palatal bone thickness was lower at almost all sites in patients with open bite than in those with normal bite. Significant differences were found at almost all anteroposterior sites along the 3 most medial sections (3.0, 6.0, and 9.0 mm lateral to the midsagittal plane)(P<.05). Conclusion: Class I malocclusion with open vertical skeletal configuration may affect palatal bone thickness, so the placement of temporary anchorage devices or miniscrew implants in the palatal area in such patients should be performed with caution.
Keywords
Bone and Bones; Palate, Hard; Open Bite; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lin LH, Huang GW, Chen CS. Etiology and treatment modalities of anterior open bite malocclusion. J Exp Clin Med 2013; 5: 1-4.   DOI
2 Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, Ludwig B. Fiveyear experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: a retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 158.e1-10.
3 Manni A, Cozzani M, Tamborrino F, De Rinaldis S, Menini A. Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 388-95.   DOI
4 Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 51-7.   DOI
5 Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec Cakan D. Quantitative evaluation of alveolar cortical bone density in adults with different vertical facial types using cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2014; 44: 36-43.   DOI
6 Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 190-6.   DOI
7 Ludwig B, Glasl B, Bowman SJ, Wilmes B, Kinzinger GS, Lisson JA. Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: palatal sites. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 433-41.
8 Baumgaertel S. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 104-8.   DOI
9 Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: S74-81.   DOI
10 Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 361-9.   DOI
11 Nakahara K, Matsunaga S, Abe S, Tamatsu Y, Kageyama I, Hashimoto M, et al. Evaluation of the palatal bone for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in Japanese adults. Cranio 2012; 30: 72-9.   DOI
12 Gahleitner A, Podesser B, Schick S, Watzek G, Imhof H. Dental CT and orthodontic implants: imaging technique and assessment of available bone volume in the hard palate. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51: 257-62.   DOI
13 Stockmann P, Schlegel KA, Srour S, Neukam FW, Fenner M, Felszeghy E. Which region of the median palate is a suitable location of temporary orthodontic anchorage devices? A histomorphometric study on human cadavers aged 15-20 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 306-12.   DOI
14 Henriksen B, Bavitz B, Kelly B, Harn SD. Evaluation of bone thickness in the anterior hard palate relative to midsagittal orthodontic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 578-81.
15 Jung BA, Wehrbein H, Heuser L, Kunkel M. Vertical palatal bone dimensions on lateral cephalometry and cone-beam computed tomography: implications for palatal implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 664-8.   DOI
16 Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage-a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 65-70.   DOI
17 Winsauer H, Vlachojannis C, Bumann A, Vlachojannis J, Chrubasik S. Paramedian vertical palatal bone height for mini-implant insertion: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 541-9.   DOI
18 Bernhart T, Vollgruber A, Gahleitner A, Dortbudak O, Haas R. Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 595-601.   DOI
19 Frost HM. The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of the mechanical and nonmechanical agents. Bone Miner 1987; 2: 73-85.
20 Horner KA, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Buschang PH. Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 170-8.   DOI
21 Janovic A, Milovanovic P, Saveljic I, Nikolic D, Hahn M, Rakocevic Z, et al. Microstructural properties of the mid-facial bones in relation to the distribution of occlusal loading. Bone 2014; 68: 108-14.   DOI
22 Strait DS, Richmond BG, Spencer MA, Ross CF, Dechow PC, Wood BA. Masticatory biomechanics and its relevance to early hominid phylogeny: an examination of palatal thickness using finite-element analysis. J Hum Evol 2007; 52: 585-99.   DOI
23 Menegaz RA, Sublett SV, Figueroa SD, Hoffman TJ, Ravosa MJ. Phenotypic plasticity and function of the hard palate in growing rabbits. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2009; 292: 277-84.   DOI
24 Janovic A, Saveljic I, Vukicevic A, Nikolic D, Rakocevic Z, Jovicic G, et al. Occlusal load distribution through the cortical and trabecular bone of the human mid-facial skeleton in natural dentition: a three-dimensional finite element study. Ann Anat 2015; 197: 16-23.   DOI
25 Toro-Ibacache V, Zapata Munoz V, O'Higgins P. The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting. Ann Anat 2016; 203: 59-68.   DOI
26 Johari M, Kaviani F, Saeedi A. Relationship between the thickness of cortical bone at maxillary mid-palatal area and facial height using CBCT. Open Dent J 2015; 9: 287-91.   DOI
27 Kyung SH. A study on the bone thickness of midpalatal suture area for miniscrew insertion. Korean J Orthod 2004; 34: 63-70.