Effect of field-of-view size on gray values derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with the Hounsfield unit values from multidetector computed tomography scans |
Shokri, Abbas
(Dental Implant Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
Ramezani, Leila (Dental Implant Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) Bidgoli, Mohsen (Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) Akbarzadeh, Mahdi (Molecular Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) Ghazikhanlu-Sani, Karim (Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) Fallahi-Sichani, Hamed (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) |
1 | Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44: 20140238. DOI |
2 | Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Pereira AC, Oliveira GH, Freire MC, Leles CR, Lindh C. An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 698-703. DOI |
3 | Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. DOI |
4 | Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 6: 23-31. |
5 | Rinkel J, Gerfault L, Esteve F, Dinten JM. A new method for x-ray scatter correction: first assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 4633-52. DOI |
6 | Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-74. DOI |
7 | Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107:420-5. DOI |
8 | Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104:829-36. DOI |
9 | Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Picorelli Assis NM, Vitral RW. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 243-50. DOI |
10 | Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:873-9. DOI |
11 | Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Koos R, Das M, Pohl S, Stanzel S, et al. Influence of a small field-of-view size on the detection of coronary artery calcifications with MSCT: in vitro and in vivo study. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 358-64. DOI |
12 | Pauwels R, Nackaerts O, Bellaiche N, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, et al. Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20120135. DOI |
13 | Siltanen S, Kolehmainen V, Jarvenpaa S, Kaipio JP, Koistinen P, Lassas M, et al. Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: I. General theory. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 1437-63. DOI |
14 | Codari M, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L, Haiter Neto F, Jacobs R. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1509-14. DOI |
15 | Sonya DA, Davies J, Ford NL. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography image quality obtained in phantoms with different fields of view, voxel size, and angular rotation for iCAT NG. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2016; 4: 31-9. DOI |
16 | Kim DG. Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density? J Bone Metab 2014; 21: 117-26. DOI |
17 | Shokri A, Mortazavi H, Salemi F, Javadian A, Bakhtiari H, Matlabi H. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study. Biomed J 2013; 36: 18-22. DOI |
18 | Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 365-74. DOI |
19 | Machado GL. CBCT imaging - a boon to orthodontics. Saudi Dent J 2015; 27: 12-21. DOI |
20 | Eskandarloo A, Mirshekari A, Poorolajal J, Mohammadi Z, Shokri A. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: e54-61. |
21 | Shokri A, Khajeh S, Khavid A. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 1710-3. DOI |
22 | Almog DM, Romano PR. CT-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance. N Y State Dent J 2007; 73: 51-3. |
23 | Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 308-9. DOI |
24 | White S, Pharoah M. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2014. |
25 | Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 323-35. DOI |
26 | Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 290-7. |
27 | Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84. DOI |
28 | Rodrigues AF, Campos MJ, Chaoubah A, Fraga MR, Farinazzo Vitral RW. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size. Implant Dent 2015; 24: 155-9. |
29 | Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 773-82. DOI |
30 | Eskandarloo A, Abdinian M, Salemi F, Hashemzadeh Z, Safaei M. Effect of object location on the density measurement in cone-beam computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9 (Suppl 1): S81-7. |
31 | Silva IM, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Boscolo FN, Almeida SM. Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 550-6. DOI |
32 | Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e1-7. DOI |
![]() |