Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.109

Effects of various cone-beam computed tomography settings on the detection of recurrent caries under restorations in extracted primary teeth  

Kamburoglu, Kivanc (Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University)
Sonmez, Gul (Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University)
Berktas, Zeynep Serap (Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University)
Kurt, Hakan (Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University)
Ozen, Dogukan (Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.47, no.2, 2017 , pp. 109-115 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the ex vivo diagnostic ability of 9 different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) settings in the detection of recurrent caries under amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two primary teeth were used. Twenty-six teeth had dentine caries and 26 teeth did not have dentine caries. Black class II cavities were prepared and restored with amalgam. In the 26 carious teeth, recurrent caries were left under restorations. The other 26 intact teeth that did not have caries served as controls. Teeth were imaged using a $100{\times}90-mm$ field of view and a 0.2-mm voxel size with 9 different CBCT settings. Four observers assessed the images using a 5-point scale. Kappa values were calculated to assess observer agreement. CBCT settings were compared with the gold standard using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) values for each setting were compared using the chi-square test, with a significance level of ${\alpha}=.05$. Results: Intraobserver kappa values ranged from 0.366 to 0.664 for observer 1, from 0.311 to 0.447 for observer 2, from 0.597 to 1.000 for observer 3, and from 0.869 to 1 for observer 4. Furthermore, interobserver kappa values among the observers ranged from 0.133 to 0.814 for the first reading and from 0.197 to 0.805 for the second reading. The highest AUC values were found for setting 5 (0.5916) and setting 3 (0.5886), and were not found to be statistically significant(P>.05). Conclusion: Variations in tube voltage and tube current did not affect the detection of recurrent caries under amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Keywords
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Tooth, Deciduous; Dental Caries; Diagnosis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wilson PR, Beynon AD. Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 1989; 34: 85-8.   DOI
2 Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Ucok O, Yuksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 501-11.   DOI
3 Kulczyk T, Dyszkiewicz Konwinska M, Owecka M, Krzyzostaniak J, Surdacka A. The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20130342.   DOI
4 Safi Y, Hosseinpour S, Aziz A, Bamedi M, Malekashtari M, Vasegh Z. Effect of amperage and field of view on detection of vertical root fracture in teeth with intracanal posts. Iran Endod J 2016; 11: 202-7.
5 Pinto MG, Rabelo KA, Sousa Melo SL, Campos PS, Oliveira LS, Bento PM, et al. Influence of exposure parameters on the detection of simulated root fractures in the presence of various intracanal materials. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 586-94.   DOI
6 Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 153-60.   DOI
7 Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Inage H, Moore BK. Effect of CPP-ACP paste on mechanical properties of bovine enamel as determined by an ultrasonic device. J Dent 2006; 34: 230-6.   DOI
8 Okida RC, Mandarino F, Sundfeld RH, de Alexandre RS, Sundefeld ML. In vitro-evaluation of secondary caries formation around restoration. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2008; 49: 121-8.   DOI
9 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Dent 2013; 35: E157-64.
10 Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 165-79.
11 Ando M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Isaacs RL, Eckert GJ, Stookey GK. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations. Caries Res 2004; 38: 350-6.   DOI
12 Murat S, Kamburoglu K, Isayev A, Kursun S, Yuksel S. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 197-207.   DOI
13 Kamburoglu K, Ilker Cebeci AR, Grondahl HG. Effectiveness of limited cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of horizontal root fracture. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 256-61.   DOI
14 Mialhe FL, Pereira AC, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM, Pardi V. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20: 136-40.   DOI
15 Tveit AB, Espelid I. Class II amalgams: interobserver variations in replacement decisions and diagnosis of caries and crevices. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 12-8.
16 Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 825-41.   DOI
17 White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008; 95: 628-37.   DOI
18 Kamburoglu K, Kurt H, Kolsuz E, Oztas B, Tatar I, Celik HH. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24: 804-13.   DOI
19 Kau CH, Bozic M, English J, Lee R, Bussa H, Ellis RK. Conebeam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region-an update. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5: 366-80.   DOI
20 Baltacioglu IH, Eren H, Yavuz Y, Kamburoglu K. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20160099.   DOI
21 Svenson B, Welander U, Anneroth G, Soderfeldt B. Exposure parameters and their effects on diagnostic accuracy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 544-50.   DOI
22 Sogur E, Baksi BG, Orhan K, Paksoy SC, Dogan S, Erdal YS, et al. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 901-7.   DOI
23 Kaeppler G, Dietz K, Reinert S. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 75-9.   DOI
24 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.   DOI