1 |
Looe HK, Eenboom F, Chofor N, Pfaffenberger A, Sering M, Ruhmann A, et al. Dose-area product measurements and determination of conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in dental lateral cephalometric radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007; 124: 181-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106-14.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1-332.
|
4 |
Radiation protection No. 172. Evidence based guidelines on cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology [Internet]. Luxemburg: European commission; 2012 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/ nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/publication/172.pdf.
|
5 |
Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Grondahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 72-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Holroyd JR, Walker A. HPA-RPD-065. Recommendations for the design of X-ray facilities and quality assurance of dental Cone Beam CT(Computed Tomography) systems. Chilton: Health Protection Agency; 2010.
|
7 |
Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 447-62.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 153-60.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Kim EK. Development of diagnostic reference level in dental x-ray examination in Korea [Internet]. Osong: Korea Food and Drug Administration; 2009 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from: http://rnd.mfds.go.kr.
|
10 |
ICRP. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. A web module produced by Committee 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) [Internet]. Otawa: ICRP; 2001 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from http://www.icrp.org/docs/DRL_for_web. pdf.
|
11 |
Goo HW. Development of the diagnostic reference level of pediatric chest radiography [Internet]. Osong: Korea Food and Drug Administration; 2009 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from: http://rnd.mfds.go.kr.
|
12 |
Kim HJ. Study for establishment of diagnostic reference level of patient dose in skull radiography [Internet]. Osong: Korea Food and Drug Administration; 2009 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from: http://rnd.mfds.go.kr/.
|
13 |
Sung DW. Investigation of patient dose for diagnostic reference levels(DRL) in radiographic examination: National survey in Korea [Internet]. Osong: Korea Food and Drug Administration; 2011 [cited 2012 September 30]. Available from: http://rnd.mfds.go.kr.
|
14 |
Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 245-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Momin MA, Matsumoto K, Ejima K, Asaumi R, Kawai T, Arai Y, et al. Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2013; 35: 311-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Thilander-Klang A, Helmrot E. Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010; 139: 306-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Helmrot E, Alm Carlsson G. Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 114: 168-71.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 640.e1-5.
|
19 |
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 461-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Lofthag-Hansen S, Grondahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 246-55.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Jeong DK, Lee SC, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, et al. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 65-70.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 26771.
|
23 |
Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 770-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Davies J, Johnson B, Drage N. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 30-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Schultz FW, Zoetelief J. Dose conversion coefficients for interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 117: 225-30.
DOI
|
26 |
Compagnone G, Giampalma E, Domenichelli S, Renzulli M, Golfieri R. Calculation of conversion factors for effective dose for various interventional radiology procedures. Med Phys 2012; 39: 2491-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Hart D, Wall BF. NRPB-W4. Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board; 2002.
|
28 |
Looe HK, Eenboom F, Chofor N, Pfaffenberger A, Steinhoff M, Ruhmann A, et al. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008; 131: 365-73.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 35-40.
DOI
ScienceOn
|