Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.261

Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study  

Lee, Hyub-Soo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Choi, Hang-Moon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Choi, Dong-Soon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Jang, Insan (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Cha, Bong-Kuen (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.43, no.4, 2013 , pp. 261-266 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area by computed tomography (CT) for placement of a miniplate as skeletal anchorage for maxillary protraction in skeletal Class III children. Materials and Methods: CT images of skeletal Class III children (7 boys, 9 girls, mean age: 11.4 years) were taken parallel to the Frankfurt horizontal plane. The bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area was measured at 35 locations on the right and left sides, perpendicular to the bone surface. Results: The bone was thickest (5.0 mm) in the upper zygomatic bone and thinnest (1.1 mm) in the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Generally, there was a tendency for the bone to be thicker at the superior and lateral area of the zygomatic process of the maxilla. There was no clinically significant difference in bone thickness between the right and left sides; however, it was thicker in male than in female subjects. Conclusion: In the infrazygomatic crest area, the superior and lateral area of the zygomatic process of the maxilla had the most appropriate thickness for placement of a miniplate in growing skeletal Class III children with a retruded maxilla.
Keywords
Computed Tomography; Maxillary Sinus; Zygoma; Orthodontic Anchorage Techniques;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bengi AO, Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Okcu KM, Mermut S. Use of zygomatic anchors during rapid canine distalization: a preliminary case report. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 137-47.
2 De Clerck H, Geerinckx V, Siciliano S. The zygoma anchorage system. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 455-9.
3 Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Stadele H, Messmer P, Morlock MM, Schneider E. Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1237-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: Suppl 2: 124-35.
5 Park CH, Kim KD, Park CS. Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computed tomography. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2000; 30: 63-70.
6 Lee CH, Rhee CS, Oh SJ, Jun YH, Min YG, Kim IO. Development of the paranasal sinuses in children: a MRI study. Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2000; 43: 507-13.
7 Choi DS, Cha BK, Jang I, Kang KH, Kim SC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of occlusal stress distribution in the human skull with premolar extraction. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 204-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jin GC, Kim KD, Roh BD, Lee CY, Lee SJ. Buccal bone plate thickness of the Asian people. J Endod 2005; 31: 430-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 De Pauw GA, Dermaut L, De Bruyn H, Johansson C. Stability of implants as anchorage for orthopedic traction. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 401-7.
10 Irie M, Nakamura S. Orthopedic approach to severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 377-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kambara T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 1977; 71: 249-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Revelo B, Fishman LS. Maturational evaluation of ossification of the midpalatal suture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105: 288-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Smalley W, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Brånemark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94:285-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. Angle Orthod 1989; 59: 247-56.
15 Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I. Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 253-62.
16 Cha BK, Ngan PW. Skeletal anchorage for orthopedic correction of growing Class III patients. Semin Orthod 2011; 17: 124-37.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hong H, Ngan P, Han G, Qi LG, Wei SH. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 453-60.
18 Cha BK, Lee NK, Choi DS. Maxillary protraction treatment of skeletal Class III children using miniplate anchorage. Korean J Orthod 2007; 37: 73-84.
19 Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM, Jang IS. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 99-112.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sherwood KH, Burch J, Thompson W. Intrusion of supererupted molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 597-601.
21 Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH. The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by highresolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132: 429-34.   DOI   ScienceOn