Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.227

The three-dimensional microstructure of trabecular bone: Analysis of site-specific variation in the human jaw bone  

Kim, Jo-Eun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Shin, Jae-Myung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
Oh, Sung-Ook (A Plus Dental Clinic)
Yi, Won-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Heo, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Sam-Sun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choi, Soon-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Huh, Kyung-Hoe (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.43, no.4, 2013 , pp. 227-233 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to analyze human maxillary and mandibular trabecular bone using the data acquired from micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and to characterize the site-specific microstructures of trabeculae. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine cylindrical bone specimens were prepared from the mandible and maxilla. They were divided into 5 groups by region: the anterior maxilla, posterior maxilla, anterior mandible, posterior mandible, and mandibular condyle. After the specimens were scanned using a micro-CT system, three-dimensional microstructural parameters such as the percent bone volume, bone specific surface, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, trabecular number, structure model index, and degrees of anisotropy were analyzed. Results: Among the regions other than the condylar area, the anterior mandibular region showed the highest trabecular thickness and the lowest value for the bone specific surface. On the other hand, the posterior maxilla region showed the lowest trabecular thickness and the highest value for the bone specific surface. The degree of anisotropy was lowest at the anterior mandible. The condyle showed thinner trabeculae with a more anisotropic arrangement than the other mandibular regions. Conclusion: There were microstructural differences between the regions of the maxilla and mandible. These results suggested that different mechanisms of external force might exist at each site.
Keywords
Microstructure; Humans; Jaw; Three-Dimensional Image; Micro-CT;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Huh KH. Comparison of trabecular bone anisotropies based on fractal dimensions and mean intercept length determined by principal axes of inertia. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007; 45: 357-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, Rüegsegger P. The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 1999; 25: 55-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Jensen O. Site classification for the osseointegrated implant. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 228-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 213-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Rohlin M. Efficacy of clinical methods to assess jawbone tissue prior to and during endosseous dental implant placement: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 289-300.
6 Bassi F, Procchio M, Fava C, Schierano G, Preti G. Bone density in human dentate and edentulous mandibles using computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 356-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Pothuaud L, Van Rietbergen B, Mosekilde L, Beuf O, Levitz P, Benhamou CL, et al. Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 2002; 35: 1091-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L. Relationships between static histomorphometry and bone strength measurements in human iliac crest bone biopsies. Bone 1998; 22: 153-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Borah B, Dufresne TE, Cockman MD, Gross GJ, Sod EW, Myers WR, et al. Evaluation of changes in trabecular bone architecture and mechanical properties of minipig vertebrae by three-dimensional magnetic resonance microimaging and finite element modeling. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 1786-97.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 79-84.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Weinstein RS, Hutson MS. Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. Bone 1987; 8: 137-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hahn M, Vogel M, Pompesius-Kempa M, Delling G. Trabecular bone pattern factor - a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone 1992; 13: 327-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Fanuscu MI, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 213-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 470-90.
15 Ulm CW, Kneissel M, Hahn M, Solar P, Matejka M, Donath K. Characteristics of the cancellous bone of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 125-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Giesen EB, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TM. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 2001; 34: 799-803.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O'Fallon WM, Chao EY, Wahner HW, Muhs JM, et al. Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 802-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Koh KJ, Park HN, Kim KA. Prediction of age-related osteoporosis using fractal analysis on panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 231-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Giesen EB, van Eijden TM. The three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the human mandibular condyle. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 957-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 van Eijden TM, van der Helm PN, van Ruijven LJ, Mulder L. Structural and mechanical properties of mandibular condylar bone. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 33-7.   DOI
21 van Ruijven LJ, Giesen EB, van Eijden TM. Mechanical significance of the trabecular microstructure of the human mandibular condyle. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 706-10.   DOI
22 Amer ME, Heo MS, Brooks SL, Benavides E. Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 5-12.   DOI
23 Moon HS, Won YY, Kim KD, Ruprecht A, Kim HJ, Kook HK, et al. The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26: 466-73.   DOI
24 Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 199-209.
25 Misch CE, Qu Z, Bidez MW. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 700-8.   DOI   ScienceOn