Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2012.42.3.163

Assessment of radiopacity of restorative composite resins with various target distances and exposure times and a modified aluminum step wedge  

Mir, Arash Poorsattar Bejeh (Dentistry Student Research Committee (DSRC), Dental Materials Research Center, Dentistry School, Babol University of Medical Sciences)
Mir, Morvarid Poorsattar Bejeh (Private Practice of Orthodontics)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.42, no.3, 2012 , pp. 163-167 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: ANSI/ADA has established standards for adequate radiopacity. This study was aimed to assess the changes in radiopacity of composite resins according to various tube-target distances and exposure times. Materials and Methods: Five 1-mm thick samples of Filtek P60 and Clearfil composite resins were prepared and exposed with six tube-target distance/exposure time setups (i.e., 40 cm, 0.2 seconds; 30 cm, 0.2 seconds; 30 cm, 0.16 seconds, 30 cm, 0.12 seconds; 15 cm, 0.2 seconds; 15 cm, 0.12 seconds) performing at 70 kVp and 7 mA along with a 12-step aluminum stepwedge (1 mm incremental steps) using a PSP digital sensor. Thereafter, the radiopacities measured with Digora for Windows software 2.5 were converted to absorbencies (i.e., A=-log (1-G/255)), where A is the absorbency and G is the measured gray scale). Furthermore, the linear regression model of aluminum thickness and absorbency was developed and used to convert the radiopacity of dental materials to the equivalent aluminum thickness. In addition, all calculations were compared with those obtained from a modified 3-step stepwedge (i.e., using data for the 2nd, 5th, and 8th steps). Results: The radiopacities of the composite resins differed significantly with various setups (p<0.001) and between the materials (p<0.001). The best predicted model was obtained for the 30 cm 0.2 seconds setup ($R^2$=0.999). Data from the reduced modified stepwedge was remarkable and comparable with the 12-step stepwedge. Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, our findings support that various setups might influence the radiopacity of dental materials on digital radiographs.
Keywords
Composite Resins; Radiography; Dental; Digital; Dental Materials; Linear Models;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gu S, Rasimick BJ, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system. Dent Mater 2006; 22 : 765-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tanomaru-Filho M, da Silva GF, Duarte MA, Gonçalves M, Tanomaru JM. Radiopacity evaluation of root-end filling materials by digitization of images. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16 : 376-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rasimick BJ, Shah RP, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Radiopacity of endodontic materials on film and a digital sensor. J Endod 2007; 33 : 1098-101.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Baksi BG, Ermis RB. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography for radiometric differentiation of dental cements. Quintessence Int 2007; 38 : e532-6.
5 Catelan A, Padilha AC, Salzedas LM, Coclete GA, dos Santos PH. Effect of radiotherapy on the radiopacity and flexural strength of a composite resin. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2008; 21 : 159-62.
6 Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A, Poorsattar Bejeh Mir M. How does duration of curing affect radiopacity of dental materials? Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42 : 89-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Watts DC, McCabe JF. Aluminium radiopacity standards for dentistry: an international survey. J Dent 1999; 27 : 73-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Nomoto R, Mishima A, Kobayashi K, McCabe JF, Darvell BW, Watts DC, et al. Quantitative determination of radioopacity: equivalence of digital and film X-ray systems. Dent Mater 2008; 24 : 141-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Vivan RR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Hungaro Duarte MA, et al. Evaluation of the radiopacity of some commercial and experimental root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108 : e35-8.
10 White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Elsevier; 2009. p. 84.
11 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049: 2009. Dentistry-Polymer based restorative materials, 4th ed. Geneva: ISO; 2009.
12 Martinez-Rus F, Garcia AM, de Aza AH, Pradies G. Radiopacity of zirconia-based all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24 : 144-6.
13 Sur J, Endo A, Matsuda Y, Itoh K, Katoh T, Araki K, et al. A measure for quantifying the radiopacity of restorative resins. Oral Radiol 2011; 27 : 22-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hørsted-Bindslev P. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1998; 16 : 8-13.
15 Pedrosa RF, Brasileiro IV, dos Anjos Pontual ML, dos Anjos Pontual A, da Silveira MM. Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40 : 344-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wadhwani C, Hess T, Faber T, Piñeyro A, Chen CS. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103 : 295-302.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Onem E, Güneri P. Comparative radiopacity of six flowable resin composites. Oper Dent 2010; 35 : 436-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Tasdemir T, Yesilyurt C, Yildirim T, Er K. Evaluation of the radiopacity of new root canal paste/sealers by digital radiography. J Endod 2008; 34 : 1388-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bodrumlu E, Gungor K. Radiopacity of an endodontic core material. Am J Dent 2009; 22 : 157-9.
20 Rasimick BJ, Gu S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Measuring the radiopacity of luting cements, dowels, and core build-up materials with a digital radiography system using a CCD sensor. J Prosthodont 2007; 16 : 357-64.   DOI   ScienceOn