Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2011.41.3.95

Application of spherical coordinate system to facial asymmetry analysis in mandibular prognathism patients  

Yoon, Suk-Ja (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Wang, Rui-Feng (Department of Biologic and Material Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan)
Hwang, Hyeon-Shik (Department of Orthodontics, 2nd Stage of Brain Korea 21, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Kang, Byung-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Lee, Jae-Seo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Palomo, Juan Martin (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.41, no.3, 2011 , pp. 95-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare asymmetric mandibular prognathism individuals with symmetric mandibular prognathism individuals using a new alternate spherical coordinate system. Materials and Methods : This study consisted of 47 computed tomographic images of patients with mandibular prognathism. The patients were classified into symmetric and asymmetric groups. Mandibular and ramal lines were analyzed using an alternate spherical coordinate system. The length as well as midsagittal and coronal inclination angle of the lines was obtained. The bilateral differences of the spherical coordinates of the facial lines were statistically analyzed in the groups. Results : There were significant differences between the groups in bilateral difference of the length and midsagittal inclination angle of the lines (p<0.05). The bilateral difference of the length and midsagittal inclination angle of the lines has significant correlation with chin deviation (p<0.05). Conclusion : The new alternate spherical coordinate system was able to effectively evaluate facial lines. The bilateral difference of lengths and midsagittal inclination of the facial lines might contribute to the facial asymmetry in mandibular prognathism individuals.
Keywords
Prognathism; Face; Tomography; X-ray Computed; Quantitative Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baek SH, Cho IS, Chang YI, Kim MJ. Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 104 : 628-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 You KH, Lee KJ, Lee SH, Baik HS. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138 : 540.e1-e8.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Thomas GB, Finney RL. Calculus and analytic geometry. 5th ed. Reading : Addison-Wesley; 1982. p. 669-70.
4 Fisher NI, Lewis T, Embleton BJJ. Statistical analysis of spherical data. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 1987. p. 17-28.
5 Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99 : 212-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji Y, Muramatsu A, Yoshida K, Goto S, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102 : 382-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130 : 779-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 : 43-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Grummons DC, Kappeyne van de Coppello MA. A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Orthod 1987; 21 : 448-65.
10 Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baik HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129 : 600.e23-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ferguson JW. Cephalometric interpretation and assessment of facial asymmetry secondary to congenital torticollis. The significance of cranial base reference lines. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 22 : 7-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Decker JD. Asymmetric mandibular prognathism: a 30-year retrospective case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129 : 436-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Matteson SR, Bechtold W, Phillips C, Staab EV. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47 : 1053-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthod 2002; 72 : 28-35.
15 Ono I, Ohura T, Narumi E, Kawashima K, Matsuno I, Nakamura S, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial bones using three-dimensional computer tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992; 20 : 49-60.   DOI