1 |
Mentes A, Gencoglu N. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93 : 88-91.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Lamus F, Katz JO, Glaros AG. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in edodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001; 2 : 24-30.
|
3 |
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32 : 271-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc 1955; 50 : 544-52.
|
5 |
Forsberg J. Radiographic reproduction of endodontic "working length" comparing the paralleling and the bisecting-angle techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 64 : 353-60.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99 : 485-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Hedrick RT, Dove SB, Peters DD, McDavid WD. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. J Endod 1994; 20 : 320-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Lozano A, Forner L, Llena C. In vitro comparison of rootcanal measurements with conventional and digital radiology. Int Endod J 2002; 35 : 542-50.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Woolhiser GA, Brand JW, Hoen MM, Geist JR, Pikula AA, Pink FE. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99 : 499-504.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE Jr. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography. J Endod 1994; 20 : 542-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. J Endod 1999; 25 : 260-3.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principle and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 2009. p. 78-80.
|
13 |
Athar A, Angelopoulos C, Katz JO, Williams KB, Spencer P. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106 : 604-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathway of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 156.
|