Browse > Article

Surgical stent for dental implant using cone beam CT images  

Choi, Hyung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, Gyu-Tae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Choi, Yong-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Hwang, Eui-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Imaging Science in Dentistry / v.40, no.4, 2010 , pp. 171-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study is to develop a surgical stent for dental implant procedure that can be easily applied and affordable by using cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods : Aluminum, Teflon-PFA (perfluoroalkoxy), and acetal (polyoxymethylene plastic) were selected as materials for the surgical stent. Among these three materials, the appropriate material was chosen using the CBCT images. The surgical stent, which could be easily placed into an oral cavity, was designed with chosen material. CBCT images of the new surgical stent on mandible were obtained using Alphard-3030 dental CT system (Asahi Roentgen Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The point of insertion was prescribed on the surgical stent with the multiplanar reconstruction software of OnDemand3D (CyberMed Inc., Seoul, Korea). Guide holes were made at the point of insertion on the surgical stent using newly designed guide jig. CBCT scans was taken for the second time to verify the accuracy of the newly designed surgical stent. Results : Teflon-PFA showed radiologically excellent image characteristics for the surgical stent. High accuracy and reproducibility of implantation were confirmed with the surgical stent. Conclusion : The newly designed surgical stent can lead to the accurate implantation and achieve the clinically predictable result.
Keywords
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Implants; Surgical Stent;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. J Periodontol 2008; 79 : 1339-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Basten CH, Kois JC. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76 : 451-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Eckert SE, Laney WR. Patient evaluation and prosthodontic treatment planning for osseointegrated implants. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33 : 599-618.
4 Verde MA, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69 : 276-80.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59 : 467-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21 : 305-13.
7 Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dent 2006; 15 : 135-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Garg AK, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. Implant Soc 1995; 5 : 7-11.
9 Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89 : 611-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62 : 567-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: A three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11 : 806-10.
12 Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, Marchal G, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17 : 842-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Walker M, Hansen P. Dual-purpose, radiographic-surgical implant template: fabrication technique. Gen Dent 1999; 47 : 206-8.
14 Naitoh M, Ariji E, Okumura S, Ohsaki C, Kurita K, Ishigami T. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11 : 409-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Simon H. Use of transitional implants to support a surgical guide: enhancing the accuracy of implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87 : 229-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4 : 156-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15 : 268-83.
18 Klein M, Cranin AN, Sirakian A. A computerized tomography (CT) scan appliance for optimal presurgical and preprosthetic planning of the implant patient. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993; 5 : 33-9.
19 Lee SY, Morgano SM. A diagnostic stent for endosseous implants to improve conventional tomographic radiographs. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71 : 482-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5 : 229-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 : 234-42.
22 Benson BW, Shetty V. Dental implants. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral Radiology: Pinciples and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc; 2009. p. 597-612.
23 White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK, et al. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91 : 498-511.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Choi YS, Hwang EH, Lee SR. Clinical application of cone beam computed tomography in dental implant. J Korean Dent Assoc 2006; 44 : 172-9.
25 Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20 : 40-2.   DOI
26 Terzioglu H, Akkaya M, Ozan O. The use of a computerized tomographybased software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 : 137- 42.
27 Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18 : 571-7.
28 Massey BC, Alder ME. Analyzing implant placement in the posterior maxilla. J Dent Res 2002; 81 : 437 (Abstr 3554).
29 Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided templatebased implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 Suppl 4 : 73-86.   DOI
30 Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 : 394-401.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34 : 835-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Azari A, Nikzad S. Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 : 1015-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 van der Zel JM. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. J Prosthodont 2008; 17 : 476-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52 : 761-75.   DOI   ScienceOn