Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2018.21.3.149

A Study on the Adaptation of Smart Growth Principles for the Port Waterfront city Regeneration Planning - Focused on the Jeju Port Center -  

LEE, Seang-Ki (Dept. Tourism development, Jeju National University)
CHOI, Yong-Bok (Dept. Tourism development, Jeju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies / v.21, no.3, 2018 , pp. 149-161 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a result of analyzing the relationship between the smart growth principle and the regenerating factors of the port waterfront city, it was found to be highly related to the port waterfront regeneration plan. Factors that are related to the application of smart growth principle derived from association analysis are as follows: ⯈ community development suitable for walking ⯈ differentiated and attractive community building with definite place, ⯈ open space, farmland, beautiful natural scenery, environmental preservation, ⯈ strengthening and inducing development for existing communities, and providing diversity of transportation options. However, in the Jeju port redevelopment plan, the principles such as ⯈ complex land use ⯈ advantage of high-density architectural design method, ⯈ various housing opportunities and options, etc., need to be applied in implementation design. Since Jeju city and Jeju port possess the strong characteristic features of port waterfront city, so it is necessary to develop jointly applying smart growth principle through integrated port waterfront city regeneration plan.
Keywords
Smart Growth Principles; Regeneration Plan of Port Waterfront City; Neighborhood Regeneration of Jeju City; Jeju Port Redevelopment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yeo, J.Y. 2016. Analysis of smart growth audit in the united states and its application in korea : Focused on Comprehensive Plan and District Unit Plan. Dept. of Urban Planning Graduate School of University of Seoul. pp.2.
2 Yun, H.J. 2002. The implications of the smart growth for urban development policy. Journal of the Korea Planning Association 37(7):7-16.
3 Hwang, M.J. 2016. A study on a planning cgaracteristics of waterfront aspects of urban regeneration: focus on dongbin inner harbor construction. Department of Architecture The Graduate School Seoul National University. pp. 47.
4 Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, 2016. Basic Plan for 3rd National Harbor (16-2020).
5 Moon, J.Y. and D.S. Oh. 2008. A study for urban activation methods through the waterfront development in the city. Urban Design Institute of Korea. pp.191-200.
6 Nelson, A.C. and J.B. Duncan. 1995. Growth management: principle sand practices. Chicago: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
7 Park, H. and J.Y. Chung. 2011. An applied study and the theory of urban revitalization based on growth management urban regeneration based on growth management. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 27(8):251-262.
8 Smart Growth Network. 2010. This is SMART growth. Korea Reserch Institute for Human Settements.
9 Yeo, C.H. 2008. Consolidated urban growth management for metropolitan city and hinterlands. Department of Urban Planning Graduate School Keimyung University. pp. 31-32.
10 Smart Growth Network. 2011. Getting to smart growth II: 100More policies for implementaion. Korea Reserch Institute for Human Settements.
11 Kim. H.J. and C.K. Park. 2009. Preliminary study for the waterfront in Jeju topdong. Journal of the Korean institute of Rural Arcgitecture. Vol.11 no. 4. pp.67-74.
12 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. 2012. The 1st Plan for Port Redevelopment (February 2011-2020).
13 Daniels, T. 1999. When city and country collide: managing frowth in the metropolitan fringe. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.
14 Downs, A. 2005. Smart growth: why we discuss it more than we do it, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(4):367-380.   DOI
15 Eom, S.K. and Y.S. Nam. 2016. Application of the decline indicators of local small and medium sized cities for the establishment of urban regeneration policy- a case of jeju city -. Journal of the Korea Urban Geographical Society. 17(3):111-122.
16 Kim, H.S., S.J. Kim, and J.S. Lee. 2008. A study on urban design charactristics in waterfrent regeneration in the cours of downtown revitalization. Korea Planning Association. 2008 Spring Congress of Korea Planning Association. pp. 409-418.
17 Fleissig, W. and V. Jacobsen. 2002. Smart scorecard for development projects, the congress for the new urbanism : reports.
18 Jeju Special Self-governing Province. 2016. Jeju City Neighborhood Regeneration (Central Area Type) Second Gate Audit Data.
19 Kelly, E.D. 1993. Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques and Impacts. West ports, Connecticut: Praeger.
20 Kim, M.K. 2010. A study on the urban waterfront revitalization : focused on the integrated design for urban waterfront. Dept of Architecture, The Graduate School of Chung-ang University. pp. 98.
21 Kim. J.I., S.G. Ha, M.J. Jeon, T.H. Moon and C.H. Bae. 2004. Urban Growth Management - Policy and Means.
22 Alexander, D. and R. Tomalty. 2002. Smart growth and sustainable development: challenges, solutions and policy directions, Local Environment, 7(4):397-409.   DOI
23 Cho, S.H., G.S. Jeong and S.W. Kim. 2011. Strategic management of the policy for seoul city's hangang renaissance. Journal of the Korea Institute of Landscape Architecture, 39(1):1-10.   DOI
24 Choi, G.H. 2012. A study on the smart growth policy of the united states. Korea Urban Management Association. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 25(3):129-160.
25 Choi, H.S. and Y.S. Kwon. 2006. Smart growth and visioning oprocess, City of Jacksonville, Florida. Korea Reserch Institute for Human Settements. pp. 11-14.
26 Choi, S.C. 2015. A special feature for the 70th anniversary of Korea's independence. History of Changes in Urban Planning in Korea. Korea Planning Association, Urban Information Service. 8. pp. 6